SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Really that many lurkers? Locked

9607 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Phil_H on Sunday, July 22, 2012 7:58 PM

It should be remembered that one does not have to be a registered member to read the forum.  A portion of the recorded reads will always be non-members.

Also note that the number of "Reads" really only means number of hits on that page. One may open a topic and find that it's not what they were looking for or it's not interesting enough to hold their attention to actually read it, and move on to another topic, but it still counts as a read.

  • Member since
    October 2009
  • From: Houston, Texas
Posted by Medicman71 on Monday, July 23, 2012 7:03 PM

I'm not lurking. I make random posts and then just leave.

Building- (All 1/48) F-14A Tomcat, F-16C Blk 30, He 129

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Phil_H on Monday, July 23, 2012 7:14 PM

Medicman71
I'm not lurking. I make random posts and then just leave.

A drive-by poster? Big Smile

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: NYC, USA
Posted by waikong on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:11 PM

well, like others have said, many threads are questions, by the time I get to them, many are already answered. So no point in repeating the same thing.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Tornado Alley
Posted by Echo139er on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:18 PM

Wow... still on this...

  • Member since
    October 2009
  • From: Houston, Texas
Posted by Medicman71 on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:11 PM

Echo139er

Wow... still on this...

 

Maybe.......Sleep

Building- (All 1/48) F-14A Tomcat, F-16C Blk 30, He 129

 

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Right Side of a Left State
Posted by Shellback on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:11 PM

Them lurkers have a lot to say ................

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:20 AM

Mea Culpa, guys!  In reviewing how I was figuring the percentage of replies, and I find I was very incorrect in the figures I was using for "read" numbers.  The numbers I figured for the ratio of replies to read are wildly inaccurate.  Sorry for all the confusion- not nearly as many lurkers as I thought!

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.