back slapping verses face slapping...

When i post my work, since i'm back to the hobby, I know there was/is a lot that has changed in the 20 odd years i was away from it.  I'm one of the weird ones that like's to hear what could be done better.  Hit me with it, i'm a big boy.  BUT!  What i don't like most of the times is the critisim of what's accurate.  I don't know the difference between a F-18B to a E.  I'm not a scratchbuilder yet nor have i ventured into the AM stuff.  I'm looking for things that pertain to the build.  Seams, colors, decaling.  Stuff like that.  It's frustrating when i'm looking for crit's on those and i get the "the missle riser you have on there belongs on a C not an A."

I think it is typical human behavior, by some people, in any group of like minded individuals, to attempt to polarize the group with "alpha dog" behavior. By this I mean that we have certain individuals involved in the hobby who aren't really having fun building models anymore. The ego is the issue, not the project(s).

Some of us, who are older, remember when styrene was in its infancy, and we built (as kids and teens) to please ourselves. Nowadays, a whole different ball game exists. We buy the kits, buy the AM to "correct" the kits, buy all the supplies to build the kits, buy books to research the kits, etc.....All in the name of "accuracy"?, it is a replicating industry based on the dollars. Welcome to capitalism.

I draw on my experiences in other activities, such as shooting, where once organizations are formed and officers, judges and the like are elected, the trouble starts. A recent thread (now deleted) on this forum is a perfect example of the lingering class distinction in the hobby that relates to criticism on this forum and others.

One thing that I have learned here, is to examine my own behavior in this regard. We used to have a member here who clearly had very primitive skills, yet, would post critiques/advice on work done by others that he himself could never approach. This ticked me off, and I ripped him for it. Obviously, a bad move. Luckily, there were members here that scolded me, made me think, and I modified MY behavior in the community.

Now, if I don't like someones presentation, I use constructive language and most importantly, I use politeness and respect. I believe anyone can receive criticism, and benefit from it, as long as it is not vindictive.

Words can be lethal weapons, and pride must be tempered. Manners and respect are the watchwords here. You can say anything you want.....JUST BE NICE.

 

Steve

I agree with most that this forum is filled with gratuitous praise of one another's work. I also notice that if someone tries to give constructive criticism that is not applied with the softest of kid gloves, there are a many members that will immediately come to the builder's defense and attack the critic and heap mountains of gratuitous praise to insure the builder's feelings are not hurt.

I agree that one should not say that someone's work "sux" or looks like "doggie-doo", but to just say "great job", "looks good", "tastes great", "less filling" does not help a serious modeler improve his or her skills. Too bad the vast majority of members on this site will not allow others to receive contstructive criticism.

I've given up trying to help modelers here in improving their craft or skills. I'll answer questions and provide assistance, but won't critique a person's work because of the wrath it incurs.

I don't think the issue here is whether or not criticism should be given.  For the most part, people that post here WANT to be critiqued for improvement.  I think the greater issue is the attitude that certain parties take and the language that they choose, bothof which can be very hurtful.  There are a good number of folks around here that are very sincere and genuine that offer great advise.  Many folks have practical working knowledge and years of research to back their opinions.  Then there are the brow-beating, sarcastic uber-modellers that just tear guys down.  Some guys, for whatever reason, take it as a personal afront if their advise is not taken to heart or taken into practice on the very next project.  Why?  I think it's ironic that the folks that tend to get all bent out of shape over this topic are the guys that do the critiquing.  The folks that get their work run through the wringer tend to be the ones with the level heads.

 

ajlafleche wrote:

If one doesn't want to be given advice, perhaps he/she should so indivcate in the post. "I'm happy with what I did, and don't want to learn to do anything better so don't post any responses that don't reinforce what I've done. I don't care to improve and I only want praise"

I'd have to agree with the general sentiment of this discussion.  It does seem like many people are reluctant to be critical of others works, which is fine.  What is not fine, however, is when people are intolerant of others who ARE critical.  Granted, some comments might be clearly mean spirited or overly harsh.  There is something to be said for providing constructive comments. 

I don't get to build nearly as much as I would like to, and I rarely have an opportunity to post my work.  But when I do I am anxious to hear what others think.  The good, yes, but also the not so good, and perhaps even the bad.  Tell me what I screwed up, but more importantly, give me suggestions to improve.  As ajlafleche wrote up above, if you don't want comments on your work, maybe you should indicate that when you post.  But above all, I think people need to remember, this is a public forum.  If a person willingly displays their work in the public domain, then they need to be prepared for commentary on that work, both good and bad.  In the immortal words of Dennis Miller, "Hey, life is tough... Wear a cup..."

IMHO, yes, this forum in particular, has way too many fawning, wish-mine-comes/came-out-half-as-good-as-yours posts, especially when the model is pedestrian, at best. There are some of us who've been in this hobby a long, l-o-n-g time. I built my first model as an adult over 30 years ago. In the intervening years i've been taught a lot by people who were building before and better than I. When I offer a critique, I don't consider it slapping someone on the wrist but passing on some of the knowledge others passed on to me as well as things I've learned from judging and being judged at contests since 1980. If I hadn't learned from those more skilled and experienced than I, I'd still be using a brush to paint aircraft, not filling seams, and painting flesh with single out of the bottle colors. Very little of what I produce is from self-taught skills. Virtually everything was learned from others willing to share their talents.

If one doesn't want to be given advice, perhaps he/she should so indivcate in the post. "I'm happy with what I did, and don't want to learn to do anything better so don't post any responses that don't reinforce what I've done. I don't care to improve and I only want praise"

Constructive criticism is nice, it can help a modeler improve and also those that read the thread, as well.  With all the personal preference that goes into builds, there is a great deal of gray(grey for the rest of the anglo nations) when it comes to accuracy and build quality.  If all the comments here became critical, I don't think as much work would be posted.  It's a fine line between being helpful and being rude.  For the most part, I think people get what they want, encouraged.  Some get it from suggested improvements and others from praise.  I see lots of thread that read something like My T-34 Be Nice PLZ or P-51 All Done Criticism Welcome.  However, less "rivet counting" can mean less discouragement.  Some places on the InterWeb can be brutal.  All you end up with is a lot of negative comments, the _____ is 1.2mm too close to the _____, or your paint scheme looks like the wrong tone.  As we all know images on computer monitors are high fidelity, and the colors displayed are always the same as real life no matter what computer you are on.  The right thing to do is to direct people to check up for themselves.  If the color seems off, tell them you think the color doesn't look quite right too you and that they may want to see if the paint they used is correct, not your color is wrong.  It's about being helpful. 

As an example  (I'm not picking on you), T26E4 is very helpful.  Sometimes he seems a little cold, but he explains what he says and directs you to the fix.  If you listen, you'll probably make a better looking model.

 

SteveM, check your PM. 

Steve, this has come up before and like any of the numerous similar subjects... the ones that don't have one single definitive answer... you will get a myriad of responses.  Case in point is the now deleted "What happened to FineScale Finishing" thread.  We are all in this hobby for different reason with different exceptions which is the reason for the varied answers.

 

Each forum will develop its own personality.  There are without a doubt less "rivet counters" (not really a huge fan of that term but it fits here none the less) in this forum than some of the others.  I think the consensus the last time this came up was that if you want a critique in this forum you kind of have to ask for it.  Personally, I want anything that I post here to be picked apart.  It will be the only way that I get better.  And that is why I am here... to improve my skills and techniques, to glean as much info from the modelers that are better than me.