arki30 wrote: |
smeagol the vile wrote: | I dont wana be disqualified because I dont want to mess up some kit that I love, or that is really expensive (like the others in that Sd set, or that 200$ kit I told you about (perfect grade wing zero custom, if your interested to know) |
|
I've been holding my because I wanted to see what fearless leader had to say. I can understand when we want to hold a kit off the list because we know that we just won't have the time or space required to build it. I have a 1/48 B-24D in the stash that's off the list because I simply will not have space to put it anywhere when finished! But....I have no sympathy for those who don't want to build a kit because you don't want to mess it up or because it's really expensive or because your skills are not up to the task or etc., etc. That's complete . Those are excuses. If you don't want to mess it up and/or it's too expensive to build, that's your problem. You shouldn't have bought the kit. I don't want to see any whining about lack of skills. You'll never get better without challenging yourself. When will your skills be better? After the next build? 4 builds from now? How about 35 builds from now? How about never because it will always be the easy way out? Not to mention, what is everyone afraid of? That the rest of us will roast you because it's not perfect? Please. It's a supportive forum and has always been. We'll give constructive criticism if asked. 'Nuff said. Let's keep in mind, that tough kit may not get the majority of votes anyway. My , if it is in fact worth that. Cheers |
|
Arki...
Well, my friend, I too was holding off with any response to this, but what the heck. Looks like we opened up this can of *&^%...
I, too, can definately understand the hesitation to build a particular kit due to lack of time or space. At the same time, I think an argument could be made that, those too, are excuses. You asked why would someone get a kit they don't have the skills for? Well, the same question could be asked about a kit you will not have the time or space to build. I mean, the GB is a YEAR. Is time really that big of a factor (and yes, this comes from the guy who builds at a glacial pace, so I'll need the whole year just to build a balsa glider......). And if space, as opposed to skills, is really a factor, why did you get the kit? Why is, 'Well, I got it so that I could build it when I add on that great new model room I'm gonna build one day...' a better excuse than, 'I got it so that, one day when my weathering and painting skills are up to snuff, I'll tackle it...'? Seems to me like they are similar at the core. Maybe it is a kit that holds special significance that the guy wants to build as a tribute to someone or something. Maybe it is just the coolest, most awesome, favorite-est kit he has ever seen and he really wants it to come out great, but doesn't think he can do it justice just yet. I don't think it matters. I don't think we are here to judge.
I guess my point is I have no problem with people keeping kits off their list for any number of reasons related to time, space, or skills. I know that I have kits that are 'special' to me and that I want to do an 'extra' good job on. Smeagol talked about a kit that cost $200+. Well, I'm not going to try to compel a guy to build that kit if he does not feel ready. This whole voting thing is supposed to be in good natured fun. I don't want guy to feel like he either has to build a kit he is not ready to build or drop out of the GB.
I also know that part of the fun/excitement of this GB is putting those kits on the list that have been lurking in your stash for years but you never got the gumption to try, but again, I just don't feel 'right' about forcing someone to confront a kit that they don't feel ready for/want to, simply so they can have the minimum of 15 on their list...
OK, that is my ... Now, when can I vote...?