RE: Nieuport 28 rigging:
As promised I posed the question to wwi.org. (Anyone interested can check
http://www.wwi-models.org/mailman/listinfo/wwi . This is a Listserv list, not the web site boards we're used to on
our decadent days. Kind of thing designed for dial-up modems and still
heavily used in academic circles. Anyway, it's members are very hard-core.
Everyone there seems to think that Eagle is right. I got several messages and include two below, along with two photos forwarded. You might note that one response is by Paul Thompson did an article on this kit for Internet Modeler - link below. Also a couple of pics forwarded from the list to make the point.
I'm just the messenger and have no views. (Although one of the gents did note that the Nieuport 17's rigging was completely different - nice to know because I've got one.)
Eric
____________
It's double rigging wires. What you see in the 94th squadron pic is a
fairing taped between the wires to prevent them to vibrate too much
during flight, which streamlines them and preserves the correct
rigging of the wings. Take into account that these are "flying" wires
(from the fuselage to the top wing) as opposed to "landing" ones,
which were strung from the cabanes to the lower wing. These later ones
were set as single rigging.
________
As Diego said, double wires, but usually (not always) faired, just like a Spad.
You could use plastic stip, but with a pair of wires or some PE each end to
attach them - if you mean the 1.48th kit you may get away with the thicker
elastic thread from Aeroclub, which has a flat section, but it would be IMO too
small for the 1/32nd kit, and you'd still have the problem of the attachment
points. If using strip, you could add a steel wire either side for an authentic
effect. What you're aiming for is this:
http://www.wwi-models.org/Photos/Fre/Nie28/USAFM//LaKr/017_15.jpg
, from the photo archive on this very site.
Paul
____________
Paul.