SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

ARMOR - Towed Gun Group Build (ends 7/1/04)

47843 views
939 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Grand Blanc, MI USA
Posted by jkeller on Monday, June 7, 2004 11:40 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Larry_Dunn

Joe, I don't think the Tamiya gun needs much in terms of AM -- it's a nice little model in its own right. Interesting how even the older artillery kits hold up. The Tamiya 88, while showing its age a bit when compared to the newest kits, still builds up very handsomely.


Larry, thanks that reinforces my decision not to add any PE detail etc.....Looking at the Eduard PE set for the 25pdr I couldn't see any added detail. I'm not to familar with building artillery pieces so I wasn't really sure.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 7, 2004 2:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jkeller

Larry, thanks that reinforces my decision not to add any PE detail etc.....Looking at the Eduard PE set for the 25pdr I couldn't see any added detail. I'm not to familar with building artillery pieces so I wasn't really sure.


IMO Eduard is a mixed bag. Some of the stuff is good, other stuff is flat-out wrong, and yet a set set of stuff asks you to remove perfectly good kit stuff and replace it with etch stuff that's just too thin to be in scale.

Etch to replace clunky plastic detail? You betcha! Etch for the sake of etch? No thanks.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 7, 2004 5:47 PM
Here, Here.

Most of what you need to replace can be done without a PE set if you want to take the time.

I got my very expensive Evergreen rod to replace the trailing legs of the Pak yesterday. Why expensive? 'Cause some idiot side swiped my car while it was parked in the car park - fortunately I was in it and got his rego details and I have the name and number of a witmess too. Why idiot? 'cause he tried to fit his 4WD into a car space that was actually a marked pedestrian walkway (marked with white stripes like a Zebra crossing) which is 2/3 the size of a car park. Now if only my insurance company can track him down.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 7, 2004 8:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Larry_Dunn

QUOTE: Originally posted by jkeller

Larry, thanks that reinforces my decision not to add any PE detail etc.....Looking at the Eduard PE set for the 25pdr I couldn't see any added detail. I'm not to familar with building artillery pieces so I wasn't really sure.


IMO Eduard is a mixed bag. Some of the stuff is good, other stuff is flat-out wrong, and yet a set set of stuff asks you to remove perfectly good kit stuff and replace it with etch stuff that's just too thin to be in scale.

Etch to replace clunky plastic detail? You betcha! Etch for the sake of etch? No thanks.


Yeah, that's the way the Eduard P/E for the AFV 155 turned out -- I'm gonna use less than 10% of it -- the rest isn't necessary because the AFV kit has such nice crisp detail itself. In soime cases, it has been easier/better to tweak the kit part rather than replace with a P/E part.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 8:47 AM
Meanwhile, I wish Eduard made an etch set for the Mack NO! Laugh [(-D] I have to scratchbuild lots of pieces for the Mack, and while they are all simple, and many are just rods made from wire, there are some requiring sheet styrene which are going to be a bit of a pain to build -- mostly for logistical reasons, as my LHS doesn't carry much in terms of sheet styrene.

There are fold-down seats on either side of the Mack's cargo bay, and you need to put wire in to make the props that hold them up. I did that last night, as well as the grab handles on either side of the cab near the doorway, but called it a night as I wasn't feeling well. Oh, I dullcoated the gun too. Interesting -- some paint bled off the tires where they hit the box I had the kit in when I dullcaoted it. That's strange, as it had not one but TWO coats of gloss barrier over it already. Wonder what's up with that?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 2:01 PM
Well I finished my 7.5 cm howitzer, It's going to be knocked out in a dio! Evil [}:)]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 4:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ddayomaha

Well I finished my 7.5 cm howitzer, It's going to be knocked out in a dio! Evil [}:)]


Cool, I'd like to see that. Will there be figures, or will it be kind of a still life?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 7:48 PM
I'm thinking that since I just finished a Panther late, I'm going to haveit driving by it! There is the tanks commander but I might put in a couple more figures.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 8:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ddayomaha

I'm thinking that since I just finished a Panther late, I'm going to haveit driving by it! There is the tanks commander but I might put in a couple more figures.


Not to be a Build Nazi, but no tanks in the Towed Gun group build! Naughty ddayomaha! Tongue [:P]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 9:57 AM
Yes I know, Blush [:I], but trust it'll look cool. I was also thinking of putting my 88 into a dio, with some American soldier examining it as the captured Germans look on
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posted by zokissima on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 10:01 AM
Well, even though the gun was finished a while ago, the Demag pulling it is finally done as well. Took me about three tries to build a colapsed canvas cover for it, and it still didn't look like I wanted it to. In the end, I decided that the troops driving it had thrown a blanket over it (since it's going into a dio anyways) and that was the last detail on this build. I'll try to take a few pics if I manage to get a hold of a digi cam, otherwise it might be some time before I can. Now, it's on to the figures and the dio Smile [:)]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 10:28 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zokissima

Well, even though the gun was finished a while ago, the Demag pulling it is finally done as well. Took me about three tries to build a colapsed canvas cover for it, and it still didn't look like I wanted it to.


Y'kniow, I've noticed that myself -- canvas covers are not as easy to make as it would seem. (Not for me, anyway.) Still, the cover hides all the nifty detail inside. That's what I tell myself, anyway. Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 8:08 PM
Larry:

A Mack NO showed up today -- now I have a choice of two prime movers to not finish by the end of build !!!!!! I've also got a spare 155 & an 8" in the stash now, so all the things I learned in this build are gonna get applied in a better job later on.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:11 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jratz
A Mack NO showed up today -- now I have a choice of two prime movers to not finish by the end of build !!!!!! I've also got a spare 155 & an 8" in the stash now, so all the things I learned in this build are gonna get applied in a better job later on.


Ha! The truck certainly is impressive. The vacuformed pieces aren't all that bad, once you get over the oh-my-God feeling of cutting them out.

John, big favor time. I'm assembling the manual hoist at the back, and they don't show you how to thread the chain through it. I'm baffled! Does the TM tell you how to do it? Most helpful, are there pictures? (Hint hint!) Any help greatly appreciated. I'm stuck at the hoist at this point.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: South Carolina
Posted by jlwilliams on Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:38 PM
Question Here!!

Were the barrels of german antitank and anitaircraft guns painted or left a natural finish?

I am doing the tamiya pak 34/35. It appears to have a painted barrel with the breech left a metal finish.
I am also building the italerai flak 43. The instruction sheet appears to show a painted barrel. The artwork on the box shows a metal finish.

So far my research has been inconclusive on these two weapons.
J. Lee Williams 2007 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build 2008 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build on time You load 16 tons and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt! In my stash gallery: http://pics.jamesjweg.com/gallery/3989211
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:43 PM
An excellent question. While the barrels and the breeches of the PAK guns seem always to have been painted, the smaller caliber FLAK guns, with their high ROF, seem not to have gotten paint on their barrels. The variation seems to be whether the rest of the FLAK gun got paint or was left bare metal. It seems to have varied based on the crews or units or something, as I've seen some guns painted below the barrel and some completely unpainted.

Tell you what. I've got German Flak guns of WWII at home, and I'll check tonight. You might want to post this question on the general armor forum too rather than in the group build, as fewer people are looking at the group build.

QUOTE: Originally posted by jlwilliams

Question Here!!

Were the barrels of german antitank and anitaircraft guns painted or left a natural finish?

I am doing the tamiya pak 34/35. It appears to have a painted barrel with the breech left a metal finish.
I am also building the italerai flak 43. The instruction sheet appears to show a painted barrel. The artwork on the box shows a metal finish.

So far my research has been inconclusive on these two weapons.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: South Carolina
Posted by jlwilliams on Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:19 PM
This is what I got started on the pak 34/35
J. Lee Williams 2007 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build 2008 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build on time You load 16 tons and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt! In my stash gallery: http://pics.jamesjweg.com/gallery/3989211
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Larry_Dunn

Originally posted by jratz
John, big favor time. I'm assembling the manual hoist at the back, and they don't show you how to thread the chain through it. I'm baffled! Does the TM tell you how to do it? Most helpful, are there pictures? (Hint hint!) Any help greatly appreciated. I'm stuck at the hoist at this point.


Larry:

Go back to page 35 in this thread & find my message with the "pintle" links. See if #2 & #3 help you any. If not, I'll rescan & put 'em up again ....

John
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 11, 2004 1:05 AM
Oh yeah, there it is! Thanks. I'll look at it in more detail in the morning.
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: West Grove, PA
Posted by wildwilliam on Friday, June 11, 2004 6:34 AM
Well, I finally got the gun shield on the Pak 40.
some goofus had glued that lower tube thing on the back of the shield a bit inboard.
so the shield would not go on straight.
eventually, i cut the end off w/ the sprue nippers and all was well.
the Fred Flintstone approach, but in that spot, you'd never be able to tell.

the crew has been primed.
last night i painted their boots. more to come on them this weekend.

then i put some more pieces together for the limber & gun carraige for the Quad.

the bad news is, i had to bring the camera i have been using back to the office.
not sure if that is the end of the loan or not, but no pics for a while now.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 11, 2004 8:44 AM
Ed, we look forward to seeing pics of that Panzerknacker done! Sounds like it's coming along nicely. We all have setbacks -- it's how you overcome them that counts! Smile [:)]
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: West Grove, PA
Posted by wildwilliam on Friday, June 11, 2004 10:21 AM
well, the camera part is the problem now!
but i will either find another to borrow, or break down & buy one.
:-)
still have to get the crew painted.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 11, 2004 4:25 PM
Hi everyone! I've recently been corresponding with Larry about his Mack and he invited me over to the group. Unfortunately with my current schedule I'll never make the GB, but it is on my project list (Mack NO with a 155mm Long Tom). The reason I popped in was to offer help with your chain hoist rigging Larry. Hopefully this picture will help.

http://home.mindspring.com/~mopony/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/hoist.jpg


I've read all of the posts from page 1 and have a question; Jratz, could you summarize the changes need to backdate the M59 to an M1? I am aware of the sheave mounted over the cradle (found a GREAT pic on an Aussie site of one also!). I have the PSP wheels, but have changed course for the Masters Productions set. The casting on my PSP set was very good (seems I got lucky!), and I was going to settle for the 5- hole rims. That plan has now been changed! Thanks and great job by everyone so far!

John

p.s. Larry, I'll get that 8" pic off to you. It's on another computer right now and I'll have to copy it.
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: West Grove, PA
Posted by wildwilliam on Saturday, June 12, 2004 5:15 PM
Hi gang!
really too nice of a day to work much on the Pak,
but i did put the sunshine to use! i got the camera back for the weekend,
so here are some progress pics.
i know the light/reflector still needs to be painted,
and the figures are more 'started than finished.
they just have base coat for uniforms and skin.
and yes, they are not wearing their helmets! Big Smile [:D]
anywho:





i did the camo stripes w/ a microbrush.
muzzle end w/ pastel chalk,
wash is a watercolor using burnt seinna. or is it umber?
well, it was brown, anyway Clown [:o)]
mud on wheels is a few shades of Tamiya brown and some coffee grounds.

also, the ammo is not ready for the loader.
and, yes, the one wheel is up in the air. Evil [}:)]Angry [:(!]
either one wheel is up, or one of the legs . . .
i am hoping to get it squared away on a base / mini dio.
i am thinking the ends of the legs get dug in, so i should be able to sort it out then.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 12, 2004 8:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JKWilson

Hi everyone! I've recently been corresponding with Larry about his Mack and he invited me over to the group. Unfortunately with my current schedule I'll never make the GB, but it is on my project list (Mack NO with a 155mm Long Tom). The reason I popped in was to offer help with your chain hoist rigging Larry. Hopefully this picture will help.

http://home.mindspring.com/~mopony/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/hoist.jpg


I've read all of the posts from page 1 and have a question; Jratz, could you summarize the changes need to backdate the M59 to an M1? I am aware of the sheave mounted over the cradle (found a GREAT pic on an Aussie site of one also!). I have the PSP wheels, but have changed course for the Masters Productions set. The casting on my PSP set was very good (seems I got lucky!), and I was going to settle for the 5- hole rims. That plan has now been changed! Thanks and great job by everyone so far!

John

p.s. Larry, I'll get that 8" pic off to you. It's on another computer right now and I'll have to copy it.


John (Wilson):
Great picture of the Mack NO hoist !!!

Larry:
It's better than I can do out of the TM !!

John (Wilson):

My "backdate the M59 to an M1" comment was pre-Masters Prod resin set, which I think you have. The two big issues on the gun itself were the wheels/tires and the "out-of-battery" mechanism. The former is fixed by the Masters Prod detail set, as is the latter by the bracket/sheave. Up till then I was gonna (actually did) make the retracting rings which were an MWO allowing a guy with a hand winch to jack the gun in/out of battery.

All the other issues on the gun and those on the limber (which you won't need with the NO) were simply correcting a few things on the kit, mostly on the limber but also adding brake-lines. I kept the M5 Limber from the kit rather than use the M2 Limber in the Master Prod set because I had already put the work in. I think you've seen most of it in our posts.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:40 PM
Looking good Ed. Those microbrushes come in handy, don't they?

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: West Grove, PA
Posted by wildwilliam on Sunday, June 13, 2004 7:32 PM
Eric,
they sure do!
i liked the control, and no brush marks.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Philippines
Posted by Dwight Ta-ala on Sunday, June 13, 2004 8:12 PM
Ed, great work on that PAK and the figures, too. I pressume that the figures are sporting the new shaved off, stealth headgear. LOL. Just kidding.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 13, 2004 9:50 PM
John R.

Thanks for the information. That eases my mind that I haven't overlooked anything for the backdate. While I'm still unable to make the GB, I did say the heck with the other projects on the bench and started another! That Mack NO kept calling me from the box and I had to give in! ;) I keep hearing a muffled sound from the Long Tom box too!

John
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: West Grove, PA
Posted by wildwilliam on Monday, June 14, 2004 6:52 AM
Dwight,
thanks!
yes, i noticed while taking the picture that the crew
gets a lot more cover from the shield this way!

not much work done this weekend. went to the race at Pocono yesterday.
i did get the engine & transfer case from the Quad painted.

does anyone have an opinion (HA!) :-)
on what the best Tamiya color for German Helmets is?

and do you think that Field Grey looks 'too green' ?
i altered the tops w/ a bit of neutral grey, so the pants should look darker.

i was trying to avoid that 'dipped' look.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.