SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Supermarine/Vickers GB

55521 views
671 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, December 9, 2021 5:47 PM

That's right Harold.  And I only do that when the paper wants to rest too close to the surface.  Most of the time the paper rests up 1/32 or so and that seems to be about right.  The paint wants to be pretty well thinned, and low air pressure is also good.  One other thing I do is spray the edges first, aiming straight down or a little toward the center, and then fill in the center areas staying away from the edges.  The British used mats to paint the camouflage pattern so you want an indefinite demarcation, but not a real loose one like you would see on a USN tri-color scheme.  Here's a 1/48 ICM Mk XVI I did some time back.  I did a pretty hard line on the bottom, not sure if that is right on the fuselage except for the cowling, which is usually not blended because the belly part is a separate removable panel.

 

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Thursday, December 9, 2021 5:15 PM

jeaton01

Looks good, Harold.  I just bend up the edges of the masks a little to get the soft edge, but it looks like the clay works well too.

 

Nice finish JB and thank you for your encouragement. Cliff and John, I am planning to do the Sky colour in the morning. As you can see below the colour change at the leading edge of the wings is not very soft, but then the camouflage lines are not either, not as soft as I had wanted. Cliff, I tried to avoid directing paint into the putty, but it didn't work very well. I think I need more practice and hopeful I will get the results I am looking for in time.

John when you say "bend the masking up a little" I believe that would mean a little over spray of Sky would get on the edge of dark brown and green creating the soft edge you were taking about, is my understanding correct?

Harold

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, December 9, 2021 1:22 PM

Nice work, JB.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, December 9, 2021 1:21 PM

Looks good, Harold.  I just bend up the edges of the masks a little to get the soft edge, but it looks like the clay works well too.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, December 9, 2021 11:20 AM

Harold: Yeah, all that work you put into her is really showing up. Sharp job!!!

JB: Love that camo. Don't know if it's totally correct either but it looks sooooooo good!

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    April 2020
  • From: West Texas
Posted by JBRaider on Thursday, December 9, 2021 5:23 AM

That S5 is looking good Lost, 

Harold your perseverance on the camo paid off, looking forward to the finished product.

A little research (I should have done this part first) shows that the camo should probably have been more of a light brown than a sand color but it is too late now...                  The decals are on, not many, it appears when these birds were repainted they did not have any stencils. That works for me as I have an edward Mk IX overtree that I can use those on.

 

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:27 PM

Bish

Nice work on the camo Harold.

 

Thank you Bish. It feels wonderful to get pass this step in the process.

Harold

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Wednesday, December 8, 2021 2:20 PM

Nice work on the camo Harold.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Wednesday, December 8, 2021 2:19 PM

LA, looking nice there. Thats going to be a fun scheme to do.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Wednesday, December 8, 2021 2:14 PM

lostagain
Harold, it was a shame that the first shot at the camo didn’t come out as planned cos the colours look spot on. Like the work you have done on the masking, looking forward to the result, you are getting a nice feather on the edges.

Tony, JB, Lost, and Cliff, great work and thank you for your encouragement.

The process I used this time is nearly foolproof except on the vertical surfaces. If I wait too long after applying the masking putty to a vertical surface like the tail putty begins to sag, so I may need to do a two-step process in the future. Other than that, I will continue to use this method on my next model.

I will give the fresh paint a couple of days to dry and then mask of the camouflage surface so I can paint the Sky colour underneath the wings and fuselage.

Harold

 

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Tuesday, December 7, 2021 1:54 PM

Remeber this date: December 7, 1941

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Tuesday, December 7, 2021 11:22 AM

Harold, Tony, JBRaider, Piers: Those all look fantastic guys!!! Yes

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    April 2014
  • From: Australia
Posted by lostagain on Tuesday, December 7, 2021 5:46 AM

 

JB, some great detail in the cockpit, hard to believe it is 1/72. And it looks like you have been dudded – they didn’t give you the last three feet of the wing! I don’t recognise the colour scheme but it is coming along well – really nicely done.

 

Robert, the carrier looks really good, you have got to be happy with how well that is coming along

 

Harold, it was a shame that the first shot at the camo didn’t come out as planned cos the colours look spot on. Like the work you have done on the masking, looking forward to the result, you are getting a nice feather on the edges.

 

Tony, off to a good start with the Spitfire there.

 

The S.5 has been primed in black and the first of a number of metallic coats added. Had to do a bit of clean up after the first coat, so plenty to do yet.

 

  • Member since
    April 2020
  • From: West Texas
Posted by JBRaider on Monday, December 6, 2021 7:28 PM

Primed and ready for some paint. This was my first time using the Mr Surfacer and I really liked it.

I added white to the centers of the panels and sprayed the underside a light grey, but I lost those pictures.

I then sprayed the top with Vallejo Yellow Ochre and highlited the centers with a little light grey added in.

I then masked off the camo and shot it with a dark blue, highlighted with a little white mixed in as well. The highlights on the blue don't show up well in the picutres but they are there.

I don't know how acurate the colors are but they are spot on compared to the Eduard instruction sheet.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Australia
Posted by taxtp on Monday, December 6, 2021 5:47 PM

Harold, that looks very precise. I've done something similar in the past and I think that'll be good.

Here's an update to my late entry, the Airfix Spitfire 1a. I've also just ordered some decals to do an Australian squadron, perhaps with Ocean grey/Dark green upper surfaces for something a bit different.

Cheers

Tony

I'm just taking it one GB at a time.

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Monday, December 6, 2021 9:37 AM

JBRaider

Harold it looks like you have recovered nicely after your first try and seem to making good progress. My usual method is a combination of tape and blue tack but I have been tempted to pick up some of the AK putty so I am really interested to see how this works out.

I find camouflage masking the most frustrating part of a build, but it is so rewarding to see the final result.

 

Thank you, Cliff, and JB. I think it's starting to come together finally. When Jack Geratic suggested using a paper mask the light went on for me. The paper mask gave me a way to see the camouflage design on the model without using any paint. This allowed me to adjust the pattern until everything fit together the way I wanted it look.

This morning I made a change in the process that seems to work better. Instead of applying the putty to the paper mask, I apply the paper mask to the putty. In other words, I create a flattened bed of putty about an 1/8 of an inch thick, then lay the paper mask on the putty gently press it down and trim off the excess using the paper mask as my template. Please see the last photograph below.

The paper mask in this location was too small for a masking tape cutout, so I created a small flat piece of putty and laid the paper mask on top. It was much easier to fit it to the wing and I could use a stick to touch up around the edges. I don't plan to remove the paper from the putty after painting I will just discard the mask and putty together. In my mind it does not matter if the putty is not exactly the shape or size of the paper mask as long as it looks right and covers the area I am trying to protect.

Harold

  • Member since
    April 2020
  • From: West Texas
Posted by JBRaider on Sunday, December 5, 2021 9:38 PM

Harold it looks like you have recovered nicely after your first try and seem to making good progress. My usual method is a combination of tape and blue tack but I have been tempted to pick up some of the AK putty so I am really interested to see how this works out.

I find camouflage masking the most frustrating part of a build, but it is so rewarding to see the final result.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Sunday, December 5, 2021 6:21 PM

Harold: That sounds good! 

 

I painted the prop this evening. And got the canopy masked. I'm hoping to be done by the end of the year. 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Sunday, December 5, 2021 8:55 AM

Just a remonder, the GB has just under 4 weeks to run. But as always, as lng as your entry is on the front page, please feel free to continue to post your builds after the 31st Dec. I don't want anyone to rush to meet a dealine.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Sunday, December 5, 2021 7:56 AM

jgeratic

Looks good.  I like the idea of trimming the putty while on the paper masks.  Wonder if scissors could cut the putty, or too tacky?

 

regards,

Jack

 

Jack, I think it depends on the putty and temperature. I use small scissors with a serated edge and they cut the putty just fine. I keep the studio room temperature at around 70 degrees F. mainly to prevent paint and other materials from getting too cold.

The masking putty I like to use is AK Camouflage Plastic Putty for Airbrushing. I leave it in a sealed zip-lock bag over night and it shelf-levels to pancake shape about 1/4" to 3/8" thick as you can see in my little 3-minute demonstration video.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/164748493@N04/51725195317/in/datetaken/

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: ON, Canada
Posted by jgeratic on Saturday, December 4, 2021 9:56 PM

Looks good.  I like the idea of trimming the putty while on the paper masks.  Wonder if scissors could cut the putty, or too tacky?

 

regards,

Jack

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Saturday, December 4, 2021 6:53 PM

jgeratic

Harold, sounds like you are good to go.  Yes, airbrush angle combined with masking height will determine the overspray width.

 

regards,

Jack

 

Jack and Cliff, I completed my experiment with paper makes and masking putty. Below is an example of what I found works well for me. I cut the paper mask and dry fit it to the model to make sure each paper mask fits the way I intended using the rectangular cutouts with masking tape to hold them in place. Then I remove the paper masks and masking tape to apply a 1/8" diameter roll of masking putty around the top surface edges and over the rectangular cutouts in the middle of the mask. The cutouts allow putty to protrude through the paper mask and stick to the surface of the model like masking tape.

Next, I turn the mask over, so the paper is facing up and use a flat putty knife to press down slightly on the paper mask. Putty pushes out around the edges of the paper mask and through the rectangular cutouts. The putty at this point is only slightly thinner than 1/8". Then with a new #11 hobby knife blade I carefully trim the excess putty as close as I can without cutting the paper mask.

The paper mask with putty is ready to apply paper side down to the model. The paper acts like a carrier holding the shape of the putty, so when I am applying it to the surface of the model only the edges and cutouts stick to the surface. I use a wooden stick to reshape any putty that gets out of line. If I need too, I can remove the paper mask and start over without damaging the painted surface or the paper mask.

As you can see below, I was able to hold my dimensions and create a reasonably soft line between the blue and white colours. Of course, using this method successfully on the model will determining the merits of my procedure.

Harold

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Saturday, December 4, 2021 11:35 AM

jeaton01

I've come to the conclusion that A or B patterns  matching odd or even serial is a minefield, and I recall reading that that was the initial plan but it soon became random, and the A pattern was more prevalent.  Just have to go with the photos, as usual.

 

Thank you, John, I agree with you about photographs. As you have probably read, I messed up my first attempt at camouflage on this Spitfire, but there is a good side to my mistake. After re-primer I masked off the lower section and gave the model a good coat of dark brown. When the camouflage work is completed, I can mask off the top side and apply the sky colour to the bottom side like you suggested.

Harold

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Friday, December 3, 2021 8:25 PM

I've come to the conclusion that A or B patterns  matching odd or even serial is a minefield, and I recall reading that that was the initial plan but it soon became random, and the A pattern was more prevalent.  Just have to go with the photos, as usual.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Friday, December 3, 2021 1:28 PM

Sorry i haven't commented guys but there's not really anything i can add to this. Some great info shareing here about schemes which i think often get overlooked.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Friday, December 3, 2021 12:24 PM

Gamera

Harold: I think Jack already covered everything so I'll just say DITTO here...

Only thing I'd add is I'd never spray toward a mask on purpose. You're better off spraying away from it or at a 90 degree angle. I sometimes end up spraying into a mask by accident- and then I get paint being driven under the mask by the air pressure. 

 

Thank you, Jack and Cliff.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Friday, December 3, 2021 8:45 AM

Harold: I think Jack already covered everything so I'll just say DITTO here...

Only thing I'd add is I'd never spray toward a mask on purpose. You're better off spraying away from it or at a 90 degree angle. I sometimes end up spraying into a mask by accident- and then I get paint being driven under the mask by the air pressure. 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: ON, Canada
Posted by jgeratic on Friday, December 3, 2021 8:03 AM

Harold, sounds like you are good to go.  Yes, airbrush angle combined with masking height will determine the overspray width.

 

regards,

Jack

  • Member since
    September 2018
  • From: Vancouver, Washington USA
Posted by Sergeant on Friday, December 3, 2021 12:45 AM

jgeratic

Hello Harold, I would use rolls of putty on the undersides of the paper mask edges - assuming it is sticky enough? 

Now, because the putty spreads when pressed on the model surface, that is something that requires looking at.  Either use really thin 'worms' of rolled putty, or you may have to trim back the edges of the paper mask beforehand to make up for this.

Another detail to look at is the camouflage patttern itself.  Eduard seems to have gone with a 'B' pattern, with some alterations.  I'm seeing 'A' pattern, which would be the mirror image of those paper masks.  Only a few period photos I can find of Bader's P7966.  Note how the rudder pattern does not match up at all with either pattern - possibly a repaint from repairs??

 

regards,

Jack

 

 

Jack it is great that you found actual photographs of P7966. Regarding the paper masking instruction: A - patten was normally used on even serial numbers while B - pattern was used on odd serial numbers. 7966 can be divided by 2 (3983) equally so Bader's plane should be pattern A, but as you said the rudder dose not match either A or B, but does look like a lighter colour, similar to the B - pattern. However the masking instructions also mention that "photographs sometimes show the reverse", so perhaps his P7966 was one of those reversed and repainted? Regardless of how it happened I will go with your photographs and use the B - pattern.

Regarding how to apply the masking putty I have learned that 1/8" diameter rolls (worms) work pretty good. 1/4" is what I used the first time and it takes up to much space. 1/16" is good, but hard to control. So if I use 1/8" I can cut the paper mask back an 1/8" on all sides except the leading edge of the wing and I should be close to the original size of the paper mask. I will test my theory before I do anymore painting on the model.

I also learned a very interesting fact about masking putty. If I press the masking putty down just enough to make it stick to the painted surface and hold my air brush at right angles to the surface I am painting I get a 'soft line' between the green and brown. On the other hand if I hold the air brush so I can get paint under the curve, or radius of the rolled masking putty the line is usually much sharper. In most of the Spitfire photographs I have seen the line between green and brown camouflage patterns is soft. I will need to experiment to see how right angle air bushing compares with the size and shape of the masks.

Harold

 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: ON, Canada
Posted by jgeratic on Friday, December 3, 2021 12:26 AM

Hello Harold, I would use rolls of putty on the undersides of the paper mask edges - assuming it is sticky enough? 

Now, because the putty spreads when pressed on the model surface, that is something that requires looking at.  Either use really thin 'worms' of rolled putty, or you may have to trim back the edges of the paper mask beforehand to make up for this.

Another detail to look at is the camouflage patttern itself.  Eduard seems to have gone with a 'B' pattern, with some alterations.  I'm seeing 'A' pattern, which would be the mirror image of those paper masks.  Only a few period photos I can find of Bader's P7966.  Note how the rudder pattern does not match up at all with either pattern - possibly a repaint from repairs??

 

regards,

Jack

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.