SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Self Propelled Artillery/Mortar GB 2006-2007

23138 views
250 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Right Side of a Left State
Posted by Shellback on Friday, December 8, 2006 6:23 PM

I'm really sorry to hear about your eye Chris , i truely hope the surgery goes well for you .

Shell

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Reno, NV
Posted by espins1 on Friday, December 8, 2006 6:32 PM
Very sorry to hear about your eye PanzerWulff.  Hopefully everything will turn out ok, we'll be pulling for you!

Scott Espin - IPMS Reno High Rollers  Geeked My Reviews 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 8, 2006 7:02 PM

PanzerWulff- Thats no good, I hope all go well.

Plastic_Cross- Looking Superb!! What part is missing?, I can't tell!

Will

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Posted by Manic Moran on Sunday, December 10, 2006 2:22 PM

In fairness, the first post on this thread says 'any form of self-propelled artillery is allowed', it doesn't say anything about requiring an indirect-fire role.

NTM

The difference between infantrymen and cavalrymen is that cavalrymen die faster for we ride into battle!

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 10, 2006 3:08 PM

WHen I think of artillery, don't you see guns firing up? Do you not? If it is primarily a tank killer, then its main gun is a cannon, with an unintended and very secondary use of indirect-fire support. If we look at it that way, we can put a mounted .50cal in this GB because on rare occasions it was used indirectly.

Will

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Dallas, TX
Posted by Plastic_Cross on Sunday, December 10, 2006 7:54 PM
 Gun Tech wrote:

That looks awesome Cross!  Very interresting, not a subject that I know.   I think I see an ejector pin mark on one of the roller in the 1st pic.

Very well done, I really like the wood box in the last pic   Thumbs Up [tup]

You have an eagle-eye Gun Tech.  That indeed is a pin mark.  I missed a couple of them on this build.  I'm really glad you like the wood box.  I discovered how to use oil paints by experimenting on that little ammo box.  It was a very gratifying aspect of this build for me. Thanks a ton for the nice comments, I really appreciate it.

Larry

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Dallas, TX
Posted by Plastic_Cross on Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:11 PM
 Will7813 wrote:

Plastic_Cross- Looking Superb!! What part is missing?, I can't tell!

Will

Will - There's a hinged shield in front of the gun sight.  It fell off while I was doing the filter wash.  I noticed that my fill job on the two pin marks was poor, so I just left it off instead of fixing it and re-attaching it.  I've posted the picture below to document my true confession.  Thanks for the great job moderating this Group Build, and thanks for your very encouraging comment.  This is a Rockin GB. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Dallas, TX
Posted by Plastic_Cross on Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:21 PM
 PanzerWulff wrote:

Wish me luck Chris"PANZERWULFF" Gray Black Eye [B)]

Chris - I want to wish you all the luck in the world.  You can count on us to keep you in our thoughts.

Larry "Plastic" Cross 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 10, 2006 10:40 PM

Thanks for the kind words plastic_cross! No one will motice if you don't tell them that part is missing, can't wait to see it finished!!

Will

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Drummondville, Quebec, Canada
Posted by Yann Solo on Monday, December 11, 2006 7:00 AM

Hummmm!  A very dark M12.  I like it alot.  You took your time on that one Larry, and the result is very good.  I remember having trouble with the decals but they look great on your model.

 Nice job.Thumbs Up [tup]

No matter where you go ....... there you are.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Salisbury Massachucetts USA
Posted by PanzerWulff on Monday, December 11, 2006 8:31 AM
Great work Cross that is one mean looking piece awesome detailBig Smile [:D]Thumbs Up [tup]Thumbs Up [tup]
ACE??? you were NEVER an ace AN ace HOLE maybe! (Lister to Rimmer on BBC's RED DWARF) Chris"Hey GRAVITY still works"Gray
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Posted by Manic Moran on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:21 AM

 Will7813 wrote:
WHen I think of artillery, don't you see guns firing up? Do you not? If it is primarily a tank killer, then its main gun is a cannon, with an unintended and very secondary use of indirect-fire support. If we look at it that way, we can put a mounted .50cal in this GB because on rare occasions it was used indirectly.

Tell that to the Germans: StuG crews were part of the Artillery arm, not Panzer arm, and wore artillery accoutrements. A StuG is not a tank killer, it's an infantry support system. Its job is to aid friendly infantry with the application of high explosive shells to suppress or destroy enemy targets. i.e. Artillery. It's primarily direct-fire artillery, not indirect fire artillery, but it is artillery. Otherwise, your definition of artillery would exclude pretty much every single artillery piece from pre-Napoleon through to the American Civil War, bar mortars.

 [ETA: Indeed, I would submit that tank-killing cannon would also count. Archer (Brit WWII version) or Nashorn, for example, should qualify as self-propelled artillery vehicles]

NTM

The difference between infantrymen and cavalrymen is that cavalrymen die faster for we ride into battle!

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Reno, NV
Posted by espins1 on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:04 AM
 Manic Moran wrote:

 Will7813 wrote:
WHen I think of artillery, don't you see guns firing up? Do you not? If it is primarily a tank killer, then its main gun is a cannon, with an unintended and very secondary use of indirect-fire support. If we look at it that way, we can put a mounted .50cal in this GB because on rare occasions it was used indirectly.

Tell that to the Germans: StuG crews were part of the Artillery arm, not Panzer arm, and wore artillery accoutrements. A StuG is not a tank killer, it's an infantry support system. Its job is to aid friendly infantry with the application of high explosive shells to suppress or destroy enemy targets. i.e. Artillery. It's primarily direct-fire artillery, not indirect fire artillery, but it is artillery. Otherwise, your definition of artillery would exclude pretty much every single artillery piece from pre-Napoleon through to the American Civil War, bar mortars.

NTM

Interesting..... that's a very good point.  Smile [:)]

Scott Espin - IPMS Reno High Rollers  Geeked My Reviews 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:08 PM

I'm sorry, But I have to put my foot down somewhere don't I??!!

Indirect fire only!!

Will

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Dallas, TX
Posted by Plastic_Cross on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:57 PM
 Yann Solo wrote:

I remember having trouble with the decals but they look great on your model.

 Nice job.Thumbs Up [tup]

Thanks a lot Yann for the compliments.  This build was definitely a growth experience for me.  About the decals......I was careful with the lighting and the camera angle for the photographs to minimize the appearance of the imperfections.  Even using Micro Sol and Micro Set, the decals did not set perfectly.  I couldn't get rid of the shiny border around the perimeters. 

The idea to minimize the markings on this model came from a great picture in the "US Self-Propelled Guns in Action" book.  The caption to the photo on page 38 refers to Morteau sector of France on Nov 15, 1944 - Battery C, 575th Field Artillery Battalion. 

And here's another dark secret I forgot to mention about my antics with this build.  My initial paint job using the airbrus was terrible. A lot of splatterish type bumps all over.  So I steel wooled and sanded it down as well as I could. Being  frustrated with the airbrush,  I decided to just us a plain old can of Tamiya OD spray paint and laid down the final coats.  It looked much better than the butchering I did with the ab. And here's yet other mistake - I wasn't paying attention and used satin finish paint instead of flat spray paint.  After thinking about it though, I figured that was just as good as painting it with flat, then applying the Future layer prior to applying the decals.  It seemed to work out ok. 

It should be mentioned that I was trying to paint this vehicle while I was home from work with the flu, running a temperature between 101 and 102.  Between that and the poor lighting in my garage, I probably shouldn't be surprised at the poor quality of the results. 

After all was said and done, I finally gave my two airbrushes (syphon and gravity) a real good cleaning - and they are working up to expectations again. 

Sorry for the long winded message, but I thought a few comments about my mis-adventures during this build might generate a few chuckles.

Larry 

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:14 PM

PanzerWulff,good luck with the eye op dude......hope your better soon and back at the bench.Smile [:)]

 

Larry,that build is excellent.....you really came up trump's with this oneThumbs Up [tup]I'v been playing around with heavy weathering and I'v gotta say I'm going back to the lightly used finish like yours as in my opinion it look's a hell of alot better.

I feel all inspired now so I'm gonna start on the AS-90,there is even a walk around in this month's Model Military Int with some great in action pics........I'll report back shortly with some WIP pics.Big Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Dallas, TX
Posted by Plastic_Cross on Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:12 PM
 Comet wrote:

Larry,that build is excellent.....you really came up trump's with this oneThumbs Up [tup]I'v been playing around with heavy weathering and I'v gotta say I'm going back to the lightly used finish like yours as in my opinion it look's a hell of alot better.

Wow...what a great compliment.  Thanks a lot Glyn. One of the reasons I didn't try to weather it more heavily is because I stink at it.  I would have ruined the model for sure.  So I went the safe route and stayed conservative.  But I do have to say that in general I like the weathered  look to be in the rare to medium-rare range for armor models. But I have also seen a lot of spectacular and tastefully done heavily weathered models, which are great, and a tribute to the skills of the modeler.  When I get better at weathering, I want to do a vehicle with a bunch of snow on it and icicles hanging from it.  Another scenario I think would be cool would be if I could come up with a way to simulate the appearance of the gun while it's blasting....in 3 dimensions.  Fire, smoke, the whole deal - static.

I really like the looks of the AS-90.  I've been tempted to buy that one on several occasions.  I will be anxious to see your splendid rendition of it. 

I'm heading over to the Trumpeter GB now and will be building the Trumpeter Sturer Emil.  I washed all the sprues this morning.

Thanks a lot Comet, and see you around the forum.

Larry 

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Ohio
Posted by SgtBrown on Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:47 AM
Alright, since my German assault gun won't work, I'm in for an Italeri 1:35 M110 A2 8" S.P. Cannon.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:13 PM

Ok, you are in. Sign - Welcome [#welcome] to the GB

Will

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Dallas, TX
Posted by Plastic_Cross on Monday, December 18, 2006 5:51 AM

 SgtBrown wrote:
Alright, since my German assault gun won't work, I'm in for an Italeri 1:35 M110 A2 8" S.P. Cannon.

I think the M110 is a great choice - one of my favs for sure.  I'm looking forward to see the photos of your build.

Larry

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oromocto, Canada
Posted by Gun Tech on Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:06 AM

Sorry guys it took a while.....      Still working on my previous GB, but I try to work on this one  as well.      1st timer with a Trumpeter kit, I tried to fill every sink hole in the suspension......   only to realise, when 80% completed, that half of them are not visible.....    Really slow progress, but good learning experience! Smile [:)]   I got the Marder 1 and Beobachtungs in the stash with the same hull Wink [;)]

The best part, should I say, the gun, is coming soon! Big Smile [:D]

Jean-Michel    "Arte et Marte"

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 1, 2007 1:31 AM

I finished the Wespe, i'll post pics as soon as I get around to taking them! The Braveheart is nowhere near completion yet.

 Will

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Timberlake, North Carolina
Posted by the Postman on Monday, January 1, 2007 8:24 PM

Is there room in this build for one more? I'm considering a 1/35th DML Hummel  - I notice that no one seems to be building this one.

-thePostman

Essayons. Esse Quam Videri.
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oromocto, Canada
Posted by Gun Tech on Monday, January 1, 2007 9:49 PM
Very good choice!   The Hummel is a awesome subject!  I'll have to build one some day.....

Jean-Michel    "Arte et Marte"

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 3:42 PM

Well I finally got to starting my AS-90 and the lower hull is nearly built,I'v just got to rebuild the travel lock as the kit one is incorrect.Apart from that the only other thing I'v had to correct on the hull is the position of the drivers periscope.

I'm at abit of a standstill now as I'm waiting on a set of Eduard PE mesh for the engine grill's and the turret basket as the kit supplied basket is just naff.I'll post some build pics when I'm abit further on with the build.Smile [:)]

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Timberlake, North Carolina
Posted by the Postman on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 8:09 PM

Count me in. I'll start to work on the Hummel in a week or so - I want to clear some other projects off the bench first. In reality tho, that bench never really seems to get cleared...Always something to work on.

-thePostman

Essayons. Esse Quam Videri.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 5, 2007 4:13 AM

Sign - Welcome [#welcome] to the GB postman!!

Will

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Timberlake, North Carolina
Posted by the Postman on Friday, January 5, 2007 10:05 PM

Greetings all,

I want to complement Plastic Cross on his excellent M12 Thumbs Up [tup] Thumbs Up [tup]. With only four kits under your belt...you should be proud of yourself. Practice makes perfect - or - Quit watching TV and go sit @ the workbench Whistling [:-^] 

I read earlier that you're thinking of taking it up a notch; I'll have to find and post pics of my super detailed Academy 1/35th M18 Hellcat. I added so much stuff that it's become the heaviest kit in my collection.

Keep up the good work.

Essayons. Esse Quam Videri.
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oromocto, Canada
Posted by Gun Tech on Sunday, January 7, 2007 1:20 PM

Ok, time for a update on my build. Slow progress as I said, since I'm trying to finish another build before the end of the month.

A lot of filling and sanding was required where the final drive housing meets the hull. There was a "Hotchkiss" moulding on the hull, but the sides were kinda square with rounded corners, which is incorrect according to the vehicle in Saumur. Eduard provided the answer Smile [:)]

The drive sprockets position is too far forward, but I decided to ease my pains and leave them there. They are hollow though, and looked like Censored [censored], so I decided to make a custom fit styrene washer with the help of my trusty Dremel. They do not rotate BTW, only the roadwheels do. 

The roadwheels assembly was a pain to clean and put together. I actually broke one of the outside part in 2, easy to fix though and the break is hidden by the axle. Extreme care has to be taken when gluing the assembly to the hull, as the alignment is horrific. I temporary installed the idler wheel, then glued the center assembly, making sure with the track that everything was aligned. The others were easier this way.

Some interior parts are provided. I did not glued them in place yet, and they are not fully completed. Still need to do some PE and plumbing.

There is a gap on the left side between the transfer case and the hull. I will shime it later.

As you can see, the alignment for the drive shaft is just out. Banged Head [banghead] I'm still thinking of a way how to fix it.      

I also dry fitted the tracks, they are way too long. Still better than too short though Wink [;)]

Jean-Michel    "Arte et Marte"

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Right Side of a Left State
Posted by Shellback on Sunday, January 7, 2007 2:13 PM

Looks like you have some work ahead of you GT , good luck .I've finished building my SturmTiger , except for the zimmerit .

See ya !

SHL

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.