Thanks for the cudo's everyone. I appreciate them.
QUOTE: Bill: Are those the infamous modelkasten tracks? |
|
Spector, yes they are MK tracks.
Nick The reason I went with them is that I'd heard they were so well detailed, which is very true. They are by far the best looking tracks I've come across. Their problem is in engineering. If they'd made the pins just a millimeter longer, they would be so much better.
All in all, it was kind of stupid to use these tracks on this tank. I mean, it's not like this thing is going to be any kind of contest winner considering how bad this kit is to start with. It can be made a lot better than oob, but it will never contend with the amount of detail on the Dragon and newer Tamiya kits. But, it has been a fun ride to see what I could do to/with it.
I've got a set of MK Tiger I tracks, too. They don't seem to be anywhere near as delicate, but I haven't done a lot with them yet. I'm wondering if I wouldn't save a whole bunch of trouble by drilling the inner links out a bit, inserting a short piece of brass rod, then cutting off the pin portion of the MK pins and gluing them in as a "cap" for the brass pins. Talk about a lot of extra work! But they should be a lot stronger. Cutting the rods would be the big pain, I think. I'll probably never do it.
Bill
==========================================================
DML M4A2 Red Army
==========================================================
==========================================================
-- There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness". (Author unknown)