NASA and chickens

gregers wrote:

72cuda wrote:  I've seen everything from canopies to trains to auto grilles to missile payload skirts being fired on   i can vouch for the fact that a Rangerover grill won't stand an impact of a pidgeon at 40 mph, there was feathers and plastic all over the place and a bloody mess to hose out of the radiator matrix. UGH. all the best.   Greg

Well, I know a Mazda 6 won't take a dove to the grille at 50 mph either! Nasty, just nasty! Found the main carcass a month later when I took the front end off to change the headlights and fix the grille

I definitely agree with both of you--the Discovery channel has essentially become "all 'Monster Garage' all the time." I don't even bother with it any more.

goatmonkey wrote:

the chicken cannon story aside, I wouldn't trust much of what Mythbusters declares as "myth busted". Some of their proofs looks pretty solid and i'll admit watching them blow stuff up is very entertaining but their experimental methods seem pretty severely flawed. I couldn't give any specific examples since I stopped watching the show but i do vaguely remember something to the effect of them just trying something once and declaring the probability of it ever happening as null and void. The discovery channel has been going down-hill as far as scientific merit lately.

AMEN Goatmonkey!  The Discovery Channel was one of my favorite educational channels They might as well go to network television instead of cable.  You have to watch a lot of crap before you get to see something that is new and interesting.

72cuda wrote:

I've seen everything from canopies to trains to auto grilles to missile payload skirts being fired on

 

i can vouch for the fact that a Rangerover grill won't stand an impact of a pidgeon at 40 mph, there was feathers and plastic all over the place and a bloody mess to hose out of the radiator matrix. UGH.

all the best.

 

Greg

You would be surprized what a much smaller bird can do at lower velocities.  We hit something about the size of a dove at 140 kts and it went through the greenhouse of a Blackhawk.  Granted it is just plexiglass but it takes a fair ammount of force to punch a hole straight through that stuff.  And you wouldn't believe how long it took to clean that little bitty bird out of my bird.

Mac

the history of the Chicken Cannon was to test the canopy of the F-16 back in the early to late 70's, first they fired the frozen birds at the canopy with good results, then someone thought that most birds wont be frozen when the hit the canopy but thawd so the engineers decided to try the un-frozen birds to make it more realistic and found out the frozen bird caused more distruction then frozen, now just about everything that has been designed for high speed is now in line for the "Chicken Cannon" to see if it too could hold up to the distructive power of a bird body flying at high speeds at it, I've seen everything from canopies to trains to auto grilles to missile payload skirts being fired on

smokinguns3; whats your fathers name? I might know him I'd used to be in the 302nd AW at Pete Field

Who knows- Dan, but they were tenderized,

OK, what puzzles me is how did they prepare those birds after the planes had landed, what sauce was served with it ?

Last I heard it was up to 95% clarity and improving. Maybe within the next decade it'll be on the market in some way. I think public aquariums would be interested. Zoos as well.

QUOTE: Originally posted by cassibill I wonder how transparent Aluminum will be used for canopies. Will it be used as canopies by itself of combined or laminated over glass as extra strength so clarity will be better??

Well, as it stands now, I would not want to have to look through what they have come up with and look for bad guys. Yes, it is transparent but it is far from being clear.

I cannot recall the year- but a "Bone" was brought down by a pelican-resulting in the loss of the crew. Pelicans are big birds-and the velocity makes them bigger.

I wonder how transparent Aluminum will be used for canopies. Will it be used as canopies by itself of combined or laminated over glass as extra strength so clarity will be better??

Look up the Canadian Royal Air Farce Chicken cannon
Every new years that blast all sorts of waste all pictures of politicians, people etc.

the chicken cannon story aside, I wouldn't trust much of what Mythbusters declares as "myth busted". Some of their proofs looks pretty solid and i'll admit watching them blow stuff up is very entertaining but their experimental methods seem pretty severely flawed. I couldn't give any specific examples since I stopped watching the show but i do vaguely remember something to the effect of them just trying something once and declaring the probability of it ever happening as null and void. The discovery channel has been going down-hill as far as scientific merit lately.

Let's build ourselves one

Yes a bird can do vary savier damage to an aircraft my father was a crewchief in the airforce stationed at peterson AFB CO. His C130 was coming back from a trip when it hit a redtailed hawk the hawk went throught both starbord engine neccels and hit the leeding edge putting one huge hole in the wing. after they ad landed my dad checked out the damage thought what they call crawl space in the wing hes bird and guts all over never really did get the smell out.

Arnold AFS(Air Force Station) is just outside of Tullahoma, TN.

The reason for the "Rooster Booster" was because of the bird strikes on F-111As in Vietnam. Seems the canopies were primarily glass and with the ground following nav and the height they were operating at, birds were causing unacceptable losses. It was put in around 1970-72, and as far as I know, is still in use. It could make a guy swear off chicken for a while....

saw that one lean great show. I remember seeing those canopies flexing and thoght, "How wonderful an idea" Now where is the one for my car?

Ben
I was at that show myself. I was shocked to see an F-4 entering the pattern on Fri, the day before the show.

http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=286263

Should've Googled "F-111 bird strike" before I posted. This is the photo:

http://www.usahas.com/bam/Gallery/index.cfm?image=F-111

Ben

Years ago I saw a newspaper clipping showing an F-111 that had nailed a large bird at 500+ knots and 500 ft. The bird went through the radome, which caused the radome to peel back in strips so the nose looked like it was wearing a grass hula skirt. It looked like the bird crushed the radar unit clear back to the bulkhead.

Ben

BTW Wayners, Seymour just hasn't been the same since they retired the F-4Es. They had an F-4F fly during last year's open house. It was good to hear J-79s again!

Jinithith2

The jet was probably doing about mach .7, normal cruising speeds. The thing too remember though, it's not so much speed as it is the amount of mass and how square it manages to hit something. I know that in my own driving experience a fairly small rock hitting my windshield at a normal speed has done some pretty impressive damage.

Hi guys,

The Rooster Booster is (or was in the mid-80s) at the Arnold Engineering facility in Huntsville, AL. I went on a tour there when I was in college. They showed us a film showing tests of canopies and engines. The turbine engines that failed the test failed pretty spectacularly! They'd fire a frozen chicken wrapped in a plastic bag. The guide told us they had to do it that way or only bones would reach the target.

The most impressive film was a test of an F-16 canopy. The camera was stationed in front of the test cockpit, looking back. They had a pilot dummy in the seat, wearing a helmet. The chicken hit the canopy, which dented in far enough to hit the pilot's helmet. The impact was so severe that the pilot's helmet deformed into an egg shape, then snapped back (this was all in slow-motion). The helmet deformed several times as the shock wave dissipated. Kind of like ringing a bell. There was no apparent damage to the canopy or the helmet, but they said the pilots brains would have been turned to jelly!

About 15 years later, I was very thankful they do this kind of testing when we took a fairly large bird in the windscreen right in front of my nose at 250 knots. Shattered the outer layer of glass, and scared the daylights out of me!

Cheers!

Ben (relurking)

How fast was the jet going?
It must have hurt for the chicken remnants and plexi to tear into your shoulder
(DUH!)

You need to believe VERY much that a chicken or any other kind of medium to large size bird can go through metal. Here is a picture of a T-44A that had an encounter with a bird. While in the Air Force we had a couple of bird strikes on the F-4. Most were just sucked into an engine or put a dent in the nose or wing, but we had one that hit low on the left winscreen, shattered the glass and severly injured the pilot when that shattered plexi and what was left of the bird imbedded in his shoulder. I can't remember who actually landed the jet but I do remember the mess the crew chief had to take care of.

QUOTE: Originally posted by uilleann Heard this on the Discovery Channel show 'Mythbusters' about a year back as well. I doubt VERY much that any chicken has that kind of penetrating power and on the Mythbusters show, every one they fired out of their own chicken gun disintegrated after impact with the first object it was fired into. I see no way it would every be possible to imbed a chicken - no matter HOW frozen - into anything metal. I have however seen air force videos relating to the testing of jet fighter canopies and their resistance to bird strikes. They were testing a new flexible material that would flex when hit rather than shatter. Pretty cool stuff - unless you were the turkey they used to test! :)

sorry to criticise, but there were some chicken chunks left(you know, the hunk except for the wings and its head and the stuff that sticks out)
and they did test it out on different stuff.
the big mistake the Mythbusters guys made was that they didn't purchase the bird proof windshield.

Oh, I know that story!!!!!!
If any of you watch Myth Busters on Discovery channel, They had a myth busting thingy about it and they launched a thawed and unthawed chicken through a cessna windshield and thawed or not, they observed the impact force was the same and It went through the windshield and if there was a pilot,

bye bye~

Ask Fabio the male model about geese. He was riding in the front of "Apollo's Chariot", a new rollercoaster at Busch Gardens. As the coaster neared a lake, a Canadian goose flew up and collided with Fabio's head. Killed the goose and whacked the mess out of Fabio. heh heh heh

An RAF C130 over Ethiopia was hit by a Vulture at about 28000ft.
I cannot find any photos on line but it landed with the vulture stuck in the first officers side of the cockpit.
He was injured, but the bird came off much worse.
Check this out.

http://zeeb.at/oops/oops10.jpg

http://www.micom.net/oops/