SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Why is space so unpopular!!!

32867 views
279 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: SI, NY
Posted by GoFlight on Thursday, March 29, 2007 1:26 PM
 Astronaut Buck wrote:

With all this, I always wonder why there was never a good Skylab model.  Skylab was so far ahead of the curve that when Congress let it deorbit because they would not pay for a propulsion module to boost it, they didn't realize that they margininalized the shuttle.  The shuttle was built to go to Skylab and whatever follow-on station would replace it or compliment it.  Skylab was huge with amenities such as coolers for ice cream (yes, experiments as well).  Problem was that the size of the shuttle was dictated by the needs of the military for their satellites.  Orgininally, the second shuttle launch site was to be only for military missions.  Unfortunately, due to total mismanagement of the construction, the pad was unusable and scrapped.

Anyway, my real question is, has anyone ever come across a GOOD Skylab model? 

 I think Skylab was a victim of the post Moon Landing excitment. We landed on the Moon, we beat the Russians...  IMHO that the onlything that Apollo was about - beating the Russians - Think back - I could see it. Big Wig holding the purse strings says "We landed all these guys on the moon and now you want all this $$ for just going around the earth in a tube... " Too bad. <sigh>

There is no kit of Skylab available, to my knowledge, right now. Mike M from the SIM books (http://www.spaceinminiature.com/models/skylab.html ) did a very nice 1:96 scratbuilt one. Plus I'm sure there are many scratchbuilt ones - You just need an Apollo sturn V kit.  But IIRC Real Space Models has one on their future kits pages (I'm not too sure about New Ware Models). I'm personally wqiting for one of these guys to come up with a kit of Skylab. I know I would butcher a scratchbuilt version.

Kevin K.

I never finish anyth

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: New York
Posted by Astronaut Buck on Sunday, March 18, 2007 8:29 AM

With all this, I always wonder why there was never a good Skylab model.  Skylab was so far ahead of the curve that when Congress let it deorbit because they would not pay for a propulsion module to boost it, they didn't realize that they margininalized the shuttle.  The shuttle was built to go to Skylab and whatever follow-on station would replace it or compliment it.  Skylab was huge with amenities such as coolers for ice cream (yes, experiments as well).  Problem was that the size of the shuttle was dictated by the needs of the military for their satellites.  Orgininally, the second shuttle launch site was to be only for military missions.  Unfortunately, due to total mismanagement of the construction, the pad was unusable and scrapped.

Anyway, my real question is, has anyone ever come across a GOOD Skylab model? 

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by mitsdude on Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:33 PM

I can remember when they would have prime time coverage of the Gemini and Apollo space missons. None of the Mercury and some of the Gemini mission didn't last long enough to show more than a few clips. The later Gemini and the Apollo missions would last for days or weeks so occassionaly there would be live coverage (news specials) on the missions during prime time TV broadcasting. When was the last time they showed a space shuttle mission during prime time. (except for the two disasters) Note: I'm not talking about the top of the hour 1 minute news breaks.

The most exciting times were during Apollo 8, 11, and of course Apollo 13.

Apollo 8 is best known for Frank Borman, Jim Lovell, and William Anders reading Genesis from the Moon on Christmas Eve 1968. If you've never heard this clip click on the link below. The video is better because it shows the Earth as seen out the window of the command module orbiting the Moon as they are reading Genesis. Its one of those things where you had to have been there to experience the emotion when it originally happened.

http://history.nasa.gov/40thann/wav/ap8_xmas_eve.wav

For me this ranks in the top 3 most memorable public events in my life, the other two are Kennedys assasination and Apollo 11.

Walter Cronkite was my favorite commentator to watch because he has a very personal interest in the space program and it showed during his broadcasts.

I still remember at 5:30 PM CST I would tune in to CBS for the lastest mission news (keep in mind we didn't have FOX,CNN, MSNBC) and hear "This is the CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite". He would always end the program with "And that's the way it is:", followed by the date.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Tucson, AZ
Posted by Archangel Shooter on Saturday, March 17, 2007 2:27 PM
 Persephones_Dream wrote:

Hi All! I have read through all the posts in this thread and I must say, this is quite an interesting bunch of people! I, too, grew up in the Space Age and remember when Apollo landed on the Moon in July of 1969. I remember Apollo 13, 17, ASTP, the first shuttle launch etc.....

I

 

Okay..I will date myself here. As a kid, I remember watching Allen Shepard first Mercury flight on B/W TV. Than seeing the next Mercury mission and Gus Grissom struggling in the water as his capsule slipped beneath the waters. The nation was glued to the TV as NASA was progressing towards it's goal of a moon landing. In that period and in a short span of less than 10 years, we have seen the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs and the model kits that represented them whereas for the last 20 some years, we had just the Space Shuttle to model. If NASA can start up another lunar project and a Mars mission, you know there will be kits put out depicting the type spacecraft used and I for one am looking forward to seeing it.

Scott

 

 Your image is loading...

 On the bench: So many hanger queens.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
Posted by TB6088 on Saturday, March 17, 2007 3:43 AM

Most modeling subjects are instruments of conflict and/or competition--- to win a battle, a war, a race, etc.  Once we "won" the space race it ceased to hold the interest of the media (which thrives on both conflict and competition), as well as those many among us who are always looking for the next "contest".  Modeling reflects those basic tendencies.  Unfortunately, none of us will be around when enough time has passed to allow a proper historical perspective on the space program.  In the future, though, I believe our descendents will look back on this period of incredibly audacious exploration and declare it to be the finest thing our species has ever done.

TomB

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Central Cal
Posted by mhvink on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:52 AM

Unfortunately no,

The movie just came out in the theaters, here in the US last week.  Legal copies most likely won't be out to the stores for 4-6 months.  Other "copies" . . . well, I won't go there.

Mike

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 5:36 AM
Is there a DVD of the Astronaut farmer available? I would like to see that...
The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: New York
Posted by Astronaut Buck on Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:45 PM
I saw it this weekend with my family. You will be able to relate to it...he is essentially a space modeller with the passion to take his creation into flight...just as we have done many times in our thoughts with our models.  It is a wonderful movie!
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Drummondville, Quebec, Canada
Posted by Yann Solo on Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:29 AM

Wow, it's cool to see an old post resurecting.  I wrote this post before I started building armors.  I'm still a space freak and I look forward for my next space projects.  I plan to build some space probes and satellites in styrene using paper model rendering.

Hey, Anybody have seen the new movie "The Astronaut Farmer" ?  How is it?

No matter where you go ....... there you are.
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Gibsonia, PA
Posted by Persephones_Dream on Tuesday, February 27, 2007 3:44 AM

Hi All! I have read through all the posts in this thread and I must say, this is quite an interesting bunch of people! I, too, grew up in the Space Age and remember when Apollo landed on the Moon in July of 1969. I remember Apollo 13, 17, ASTP, the first shuttle launch etc.....

I am also an astronomer and someone who works and studies in the aerospace fields.  Like many, my interest in my chosen career path was piqued as a young child with the Mercury and Gemini programs, etc.  Aside from the modelling world - of which I built almost every space model available up until my life took me away from model building 28 years ago - the question of what happened with space exploration is a vast and deep one. There is no single answer, no magic answer as to why our collective interest in it died off to the point of almost non-existence. 

For one thing, back then we had real Heroes.  Today, we have none.  Kids today don't idolize people like we did when we were younger.  They are more interested in instant graitification than spending time doing anything and - especially - learning something.  Model building was more than just slapping glue, paint and decals on plastic.  You could not help but to learn about history as a model builder.  The more you built, the more you learned. It was a multi-faceted hobby as it taught history, it taught patience, it taugh skill with your hands and it provided fuel for your imagination.  Kids today are not interested in this.  They want their X-boxes and rapid fire two-second soundbyte world.  The world us middle aged (and older) people knew is gone - at least as we once knew it anyway.

It's funny, though, how things in Life happen. As I said, I have not built a model in 28 years.  It's not that I didn't want to, it's just that Life had other plans for me and there was no time left for such activities.  But, three years ago I met a woman who has since become my wife.  What is incredibly interesting to me is that she is 9 years younger than I am (I'm 45) - and had absolutely no clue what the Apollo program was!  She had vaguely heard of it but didn't know anything about it.  She had never heard of Gemini or Mercury and really had not much background on the Space Shuttle either.

However, she had an interest in all of it - joined the local astronomy club and even went to graduate school in space studies.  From my perspective it has been an interesting trip, as I can relate most of this stuff first hand to her.  I was there.  I remember it.  I was a part of that history and a part of that dream that people from her age bracket have no clue existed! It is so very strange the differences, in this respect, that a mere 9 years made!

However, to make a rather long story short, as she got more involved and interested in this subject area, I began looking at all my old modelling supplies.  We ended up buying several models from Ebay - Apollo CSM, Lunar Module, Vostok, Apollo-Soyuz Test Project and, more recently, some of the very origins of the Space Race itself - the German V-1 and V-2 (or A-4, depending on how you look at it) rockets.  My wife now knows what these are, what they looked like, where they came from and what they caused in the future which is now our history.

While most of us old time modellers know how one thing always leads to another, my wife is discovering more history than she ever knew existed.  Right now she's learning about the old Nike missile systems that used to guard some of our major cities.  We've been able to locate and construct the old Revell Nike-Hercules kit and the old Renwal Nike-Ajax kit. 

Even more interesting, though, is that she never knew 12 of the Nike bases existed in the city we live in.  What's surprising is that several of them are still there, abandoned and empty for the past 33 years - but still standing.  We've begun going around and surveying the sites, taking pictures and actually walking through them.  Building the models is a great way to learn - but nothing compares to actually experiencing the real things/places behind the models.

It's been an interesting trip back into the modelling world :)

-Ro

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: New York
Posted by Astronaut Buck on Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:56 PM

One thing to remember is that the Apollo/ Gemini/ Mercury programs are as real to young people today as World War II is to those in their 50s.  They can't relate to the excitement because their exposure to space has been a constant battle for funding and direction to get people under 250 miles in Earth orbit.  If you look at the potential that was Apollo and how it was brutally killed at its prime it is more than a pity.  I have dreamed of the space program since I was small and am constantly dissappointed to know that I will not live to live in space, to travel to the moon, or to see the results of the first manned extensive exploration of Mars.  It's interesting to see a poster Alcoa Aluminum put out that showed first manned Mars landing in 1974.  I still feel like 2001 was owed to me.  So at this point, I follow the progam and collect models and collectibles from the real space exploration program.  If you think about the fact that NASA is struggling to get funding for a manned space program which is the equivalent of a month's war spending, we can clearly see the direction ahead.  Our only hope is commercial space.

In the mean time, we need some of the older models restored.  One of the best, I believe, is still the Mercury Atlas with its launch gantry.

America needs space to grow! 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Northern KY
Posted by mucker on Sunday, February 18, 2007 10:06 AM

If you don't mind an Aircraft modeller chiming in...I couldn;t help notice that the most popular post in the space thread is about how unpopular space is. Now, that's irony!

Anyways, I personally think "space" includes a large portion of "Sci-Fi" as well. When you think Star Wars, Star Trek, and the million others, "space" is actually quite popular. Aircraft modelling has its own sub-divisions, WWI, propellers, jets, etc,....Space does, too, but there is a relatively shorter history that aircraft, which abviously limits the "real" spacecraft, but when you consider the broader area of sci-fi, I'd venture to say it's actually quite popular. My kids would prefer a Star Wars or Gundam model anyday to one of my "old and slow WWII planes".

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Arlington, VA
Posted by flynavy1958 on Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:56 AM

It seems to me that space subjects as being unpopular goes to the question of why individuals have picked up this hobby.  I would guess that many are vets of military service and build those items that they used to deal with, or wanted to deal with.  (Witness the Vet GB on this site...) 

Others have their own reasons for making models, but personal histories, and wanting to artistically express some sense of patriotism are, (I'd bet a space of your choosing!) big reasons for the spread of this hobby.

That said, I find the sheer variety in the military fields of modeling much more interesting than space subjects, myself.  I'm guessing the rather limited options that would be available for space kits turns some off.  How many versions of a Redstone Rocket were there?  Probably several, but did they look all that different from one another?  The advent of after-market decals and the gradual proliferation of obscure aircraft types into the market provides competition that would make it very difficult for space subjects to compete with.  Much easier to wrap my head around a 1950s helicopter than some artefact of Star Wars.

Flynavy1958 

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Friday, February 16, 2007 1:27 AM
I certainly hope that NASA's new moon program will put fire into everyone's belly once again...
The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Friday, February 16, 2007 1:13 AM
 Yann Solo wrote:

 

The idea of starting with card models to scratchbuilt them with plastic is a very good idea.  I never thought about it and I'll give that a try someday.

 

I also plan on trying this when I build that 1/48 Saturn V...

The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: The flatlands of Kansas
Posted by Griz on Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:03 AM

What????  Space unpopular?  I had no idea, all this time I thought we were just an elite bunch of modelers!

Having grown up with the space program, modeling gives me the opportunity to remember the "good old days" and when the neighborhood kids stop by and see the models, they get to experience (if only for a little while) the space program in a way that the history books can never duplicate!

It's the new generation that has to get interested in space exploration before there is anything "new" to model!My 2 cents [2c]

Griz
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Towradgi, near the beach!
Posted by traveller on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 8:45 PM
I have read this forum, and agree that this subject is not all that popular. In saying that, I disagree that it is unpopular, as this area is a small part of the overall hobby. It has been written that the money is the motivation of the manufacturers, and space is not that profitable. I have Revell's mighty 1/96 scale Apollo Saturn V kit, and I have ordered the resin conversion for it. I also have  Atomic City's Mercury capsule, but they were not cheap. People may rather spend the money on 2 or more kits for the same price as 1, and storage wise, these kits are not small. I would like to get a 1/12 scale Apollo CSM, Vostock, Gemini, or Soyuz capsule. In 2009 it will be 40 years since Apollo 11 landed on the moon. Now is the time to push for more space kits, to remind people of what was and is being achieved in space. The club I am involved in, our show then, I hope, will be called Space Race 2009, focusing in on real and sci-fi space.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: SI, NY
Posted by GoFlight on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:48 PM

I don't think that it's unpopular, I just feel that the niche for it is small. A little smaller than sci-fi, but not as small as figures IMHO. Why? I think it's because of the success of the space program. Both Mercury and Gemini projects led to the Apollo mission. Despite the usual thinking I don't think the Apollo mission had anything to do with science. I was strictly for the success of beating the Soviets to the Moon. Once we did and made it look easy, then the nations attention went elsewhere.

Model Companies initially had a few good models out and were bought up by fans. As the attention was drawn elsewhere, their profits dried up and they too looked elsewhere for other subjects. Same with the Shuttle. At the begining of the Shuttle project a few Companies came out with kits, but when the successes became commonplace the money went away.

At the same time the nations youth were more interested in seeing upclose space with the Hubble pictures and the special effects on TV and in video games than imagining things and building a model. Kid's will spend hours online and infront of a Gameboy. But won't even venture down the model aisle of a craft store. They've become passive participants to their own lives.

But Space models aren't dead. They survive thanks to the designers and producers of resin garage kits. Glenn of Real Space Models (www.realspacemodels.com) and Tomas from New Ware (http://mek.kosmo.cz/newware/  ) come to mind first. They don't have to be that expensive either. Sure, you can get Glenn's 1:24 Viking Orbiter and Lander for $150, but you can also get a 1:144 Little Joe for $15, or a 1:144  Mercury Redstone rocket for $20.  New Ware has similar deals - a 1:72 Viking 10 rocket or a Pioneer 4 launch vehicle for $17 or a 1:144 Atlas Agena for $26. So you see buying space insn't the outrageous prices you thought.

Finally it thats too expensive build your own. What I often do is take the card models and use them as templates to make styrene kits. A little additional research (not all card models are accurate) and few styrene "for sale" signs from a hardware store is all you need. Give it a try!

 

Oh , BTW I have no financial interest in those model co.'s. I'm just a satisfied customer.

Kevin K.

I never finish anyth

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Freeport, IL USA
Posted by cdclukey on Friday, February 9, 2007 12:36 PM

 grandadjohn wrote:
Maybe with a sex scandel and an attempted murder charge interest will pick up

Well, it worked for figure skating!

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: NYC
Posted by kp80 on Friday, February 9, 2007 6:53 AM
I think the manned space program has lost it's edge.  Putting people in orbit has become as commonplace as an international flight, and about equally as newsworthy when something goes wrong.  I grew up worshipping the Mercury 7 astronauts.  I had a picture of them on my wall.  I read everything I could about them.  My uncle, a retired USAF test pilot, trained as a USAF astronaut back when the AF and NASA each had their own program.  I had a picture of him in his silver space suit holding his helmet.  I remember visiting his home at Edwards AFB, being placed in the cockpit of his fighter jet (helmet and all).  Although I didn't know it at the time, one of my uncle's friend who stopped by for a barbeque was astronaut Ed White.  I still look up to those guys and I'm in awe of what they did.  Unfortunately I think that will be lost upon future generations for many of the reasons stated in the string of posts here.  I truly hope that the our space program does not stall but rather pushes out to the next "edge", and that it reignites a whole new generation with an exploratory spirit.
  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by IL2windhawk on Thursday, February 8, 2007 6:56 PM

 Bgrigg wrote:
NASA took the last Saturn V rocket, broke it up into little pieces and laid it on it's side. A working rocket, the most powerful people mover ever built, and they laid it on it's side.

I would imagine that this was done for safety.  What with all
the hurricanes that hit Florida and all, that relatively light-weight
structure wouldn't stand up to a strong wind loading.  Besides,
with it on the ground people can look at each segment up close,
instead of just the main nozzles at ground level.

 ----

I read through most of the first page, but didn't get past that. 
Some of the comments really made me wonder, "why don't
people find space more fascinating, like I do?"  I don't think
that it has as much to do with the priorities of the new
generation as it does with pure human nature.  Hell, man
walked on the moon at Apollo 11, but already by was bored
with the Apollo program at 13.  (well - until the problems arose).

As for space models, I dunno.  Maybe people just feel more
distant to the space program.  We see cars all day long, and
most of us have been to airshows and see airplanes in the sky
on a regular basis.  Maybe it has something to do with this.  
I guess that doesn't explain the popularity of armor, though.

I think that some folks are turned off by the space program in
general because they feel like they never have any chance of
participating.  To even be considered for any sort of space program,
you generally need engineering and science training.  
You can write off 90% of the population right there.

Lasty...
For you space nuts, I HIGHLY recommend downloading
the free space simulator "OrbiterSim".  It is a great teacher
about orbital mechanics.  Flying in space doesn't quite work
like you would intuitively expect.  For instance, if you want
to accelerate your orbit speed, you perform a burn in the
opposite direction!  Really fascinating stuff. 

Thanks for giving me something to think about on the way home.
Cheers.

  1/32 Revell Duo Discus
  1/32 Revell ASK-21
  1/48 Ardpol SZD-51 Junior
  1/48 Czech Models Grumman Goose
  1/144 FineMolds Millennium Falcon

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Drummondville, Quebec, Canada
Posted by Yann Solo on Thursday, February 8, 2007 10:03 AM

A cut-away view of a rocket would be very interesting and maybe people would see how cool these vehicles are.

Most space probes, spacecraft, space telescope and other unmanned space vehicles would be way too cool to build.  (Maybe not as boring as rocketsSmile,Wink, & Grin [swg])  Plastic kits of these vehicles would all end up on my shelf if they were not expensive.  But manufacturers will not produce them simply because they will not sell enough to keep a low price.

The idea of starting with card models to scratchbuilt them with plastic is a very good idea.  I never thought about it and I'll give that a try someday.

No matter where you go ....... there you are.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:58 AM
 Welshrob wrote:

Personnaly I like all aspects of the space program and I still have my poster of the original astronauts.  Yet I would never consider building a model though I do build model rockets that take off and get caught in trees :-) 

 

WR 

 

Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder... One can't really impress anyone...

you can say many real-space modelers dream of becoming astronauts (I know, I do, and still want to...), and our interests in the space program is not just confined on those tall rockets, heroic astronaut portraits and the like...

we all have our reasons why we love this subject, but the important thing is we love it, as a whole...

 

 

 Welshrob wrote:
Rocket ships are boring to look at,have no class and  little history. The only exciting thing about spaceflight is BLASTOFF and Reentry.

I disagree on that sir...

Well, rockets aren't made to be pretty, like airliners, or some flashy jets and cars and ships... In fact, most people think of rockets as "flying pencils"... (well in our place it is called like that)

But the thing is, their looks aren't for show, they are there for a reason, which is usually critical...

Little history? Maybe so... But the fact is, during that short time span, the space program has advanced from notoriously crude machines to the fastest and the most sophisticated vehicles ever invented...

 

and no offensement sir, but try saying that to the more than 4,000 astronaut candidaccy applicants vying for just 8 slots (sometimes even less) once every 2 years.... plus the people here that are very much enthusiastic about spaceflight, like me... its quite offensive sir...

please make your opinions a little "reader friendly"... you might not know who are you hitting here...

anyway just my 2 cents...

The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:52 AM
 mhvink wrote:

So, to sum it up . . .

Space is not unpopular, it has just moved to a different media format (paper instead of plastic).  In that arena, it is VERY popular.  You can find nearly ALL spacecraft from the US, Russia, China and Europe.  As well as over 30 different satellites & space probes.

You can also use the paper patterns as masters for scratch building in plastic, if desired.

I still love plastic, but in today's economic climate, when a 1/96 Saturn V (in plastic) costs upwards of $89 (US) and the same Saturn V (in paper) costs about $0.14 (for cardstock), you can see why paper models are becoming so popular.

Mike

 

yup I agree on that...

 

many people say that the reason why model manufacturers doesn't spend much on real-space subjects is because of the lack of potential profits... is short, it all boils down to money...

while card models, you can share a single throughout the net, and build ans many as you want till your hands bleed... (this is true when Revell cancelled their plans for a 1/48 scale SpaceShipOne)

plus, if, for some reason, your subject is still to be realized in card or plastic, you can actually design it by yourself using a 3D software with an "unfolder" program....

 and just like you said sir, card models make great styrene templates, no need for vacuum-forming, just cut and fold, or roll. Just sand away the imperfections and fill in some with putty or whatever...

The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Thursday, February 8, 2007 8:45 AM
 Yann Solo wrote:
 Hans Christian M. Ben wrote:

Right now, I'm building the 1/100 card ISS & STS at www.marscenter.it...

Please post some pics whenever you can.  I'dd like to see that.  I've printed the files a while back ago but never started the project.

I'll post them as sson as I get into them!!!
The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: da UP
Posted by Welshrob on Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:28 PM

Rocket ships are boring to look at,have no class and  little history. The only exciting thing about spaceflight is BLASTOFF and Reentry.

 

Personnaly I like all aspects of the space program and I still have my poster of the original astronauts.  Yet I would never consider building a model though I do build model rockets that take off and get caught in trees :-) 

 

WR 

What goes here?
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Central Cal
Posted by mhvink on Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:12 AM

So, to sum it up . . .

Space is not unpopular, it has just moved to a different media format (paper instead of plastic).  In that arena, it is VERY popular.  You can find nearly ALL spacecraft from the US, Russia, China and Europe.  As well as over 30 different satellites & space probes.

You can also use the paper patterns as masters for scratch building in plastic, if desired.

I still love plastic, but in today's economic climate, when a 1/96 Saturn V (in plastic) costs upwards of $89 (US) and the same Saturn V (in paper) costs about $0.14 (for cardstock), you can see why paper models are becoming so popular.

Mike

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Drummondville, Quebec, Canada
Posted by Yann Solo on Wednesday, February 7, 2007 8:52 AM
 Hans Christian M. Ben wrote:

Right now, I'm building the 1/100 card ISS & STS at www.marscenter.it...

Please post some pics whenever you can.  I'dd like to see that.  I've printed the files a while back ago but never started the project.

No matter where you go ....... there you are.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Wednesday, February 7, 2007 7:46 AM
 Yann Solo wrote:

I hear you Hans ..... I've built almost everything that was available on the net.  It is a really fun and inxepensive hobby.  And there is plenty of choice.

Have you tried the laser cutted models from spacecraftkits.com or the ones from delta7studios.com ?

They are great

Yup, if somebody can't find a model in kit form, I can bet they can find it in card, especially real space...

I've yet to try the delta7studios & the spacecraftkits.com model, but looking forward to it because they're so greatly detailed...

 

Right now, I'm building the 1/100 card ISS & STS at www.marscenter.it...

The Sky is NOT the Limit
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Imus, Cavite, Philippines
Posted by Hans Christian M. Ben on Wednesday, February 7, 2007 7:33 AM
 mhvink wrote:

I agree totally with Hans.  I just completed a 1/48 Gemini-Titan rocket and am currently working on a 1/48 Apollo Saturn V w/ block 2 SM.  Another premium advantage of paper models is that you can "repaint" it to any markings you wish -- and if you make a mistake, you can just print out another replacement part.

Mike

plus, you can detail it as extensive as you like!!!

check this out:

 

This is the 1/48 scale Saturn V (still not finished) that a friend of ours at the cardmodels.net forumboards is designing (name's Greelt). He plans to finish the whole rocket to the top, including the CSM & LEM (& from what I've heard, he plans to design the interior)...

so far this are the parts that is available, but he hopes to finish it soon...

oh, and don't ask for the price... its 100% free when fully available...

this and many other real-space models hosed by another friend of ours at cardmodels.net, Jonathan Leslie

http://jleslie48.com/

check out the links page for more

The Sky is NOT the Limit
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.