SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:18 PM
OK, more clues needed - the aircraft designer in question had a name,which translated into English would mean Knife Smith.  From that, can you deduce the error in the nickname it was supposed to have?  The kit in question, that used the fake name, was by Hobbycraft, but also marketed by Academy, in 1/48 scale.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, October 9, 2009 9:27 AM

This aircraft company's name, translated into English, is an excellent name for a company that produces weapons.  It's most famous aircraft was later developed, and indeed built, by others, but the company name became a nickname for it's famous aircraft.  Pilots would often call it by it's nickname, or, the first half of it's nickname.  Later it was exported to a country, where it's pilots also used the first hald of the nickname.

A confusion arose because people, knowing what this country's pilots called the aircraft, and knowing the English translation of the nickname, re-translated the nickname into the language of the country that bought it.  A Korean/Canadian model kit then used this re-translation of the nickname as it's official name for this aircraft.

What's the name?

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, October 9, 2009 9:00 AM

And I thought that I asked some stumpers?

With out some elaboration I am, as they say "done".

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:09 AM

This aircraft was re-developed, and then sold to a country, which most certainly the designer/original manufacturer would have opposed, if he had lived.  Since then, this new version aquired two nicknames.  One refers to it's handling and/or origins.  The other however, which is used by a kit manufacturer, is completely wrong, it being the English translation of it's real nickname, re-translated in the language of the host country.

What was the second nickname, used in the kit, that's wrong, and why did it come about (there's a very good reason)?

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:01 AM
BINGO!!!! Well done osher! Floor is yours.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 7:17 AM

They both out-lived their successors?

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:46 AM
Hint: Swordfish vs Albacore
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 7:37 AM
Sorry, those are not the answers I am looking for. It has nothing directly related to their designs in comparison.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Grand Bay, New Brunswick ,Canada
Posted by MECHTECH on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 7:32 AM
They both used radar for reconnaissance? They both used radar while scouting for the enemy...the Jake for Pearl Harbour and Guadalcanal, the Swordfish for the Bismark and the Italian Fleet.Confused [%-)]
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 7:31 AM

Both are ugly as?

Both were at some point fitted with radar?

Both had a .303 fitted as rear armament, the Stringbag a Lewis & the other a Type 92, which was a Lewis copy???

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 7:09 AM

Ok, for the next question.

What trait does the Fairey Swordfish, and the Aichi E13A1 'Jake' have in common?

No, the fact that the Swordfish can be configured to be a floatplane is not it.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, October 5, 2009 10:41 AM

Yes, that is correct. As used by the MDD marketing department.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, October 5, 2009 10:09 AM
F-4 Phantom?
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, October 5, 2009 4:44 AM

No. The A/C in question is slightly more modern than the Cat.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, October 5, 2009 1:54 AM
PBY Catalina?
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, October 4, 2009 3:32 PM

OK, What A/C is this quotation linked to;

"Rose from the land and sea to take command of the air"

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Saturday, October 3, 2009 9:37 PM
 Milairjunkie wrote:

Country of origin:- Japan 

The aircraft used:- Yokosuka E14Y "Glen" (submarine launched)

The actual target of the attempts:- Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon.

Other wise known as "The lookout air raid".

I can think of some more recent events that would fit the bill, but doubt you have these in mind?

 

On researching this air raid, I came across some unconnected, but all the same interesting reading about "Weather Station Kurt" - Google it.

 

You got one of them spot-on.  The other was the balloons that Japan launched--they launched something like 9,000 of these, and while about 300 of them were either found or observed as having reached the US, later research puts it at about 1,000 that reached North America.  The goal of these was initially to destroy forests and farmland, not cities.  They were fitted with incendiary bombs, designed to burn the land and not people or cities like someone else here said.  Japanese planners undoubtedly knew that the common building structures in America were not at all like the ones in Japan--and so the use of incendiary bombs shows that their initial target was not cities. 

 

Over to you!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, October 3, 2009 5:15 PM
Well, the US did try and use bats to attack Japan, and it progressing nicely, before it was canned (the nuke was used instead).  However, during a test, the bats were too successful, and didn't just attack the intended target, but, also, attacked the airfield, causing a lot of damage.  I guess you could say that bats attacked a US continental target!
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, September 30, 2009 4:57 AM

Country of origin:- Japan 

The aircraft used:- Yokosuka E14Y "Glen" (submarine launched)

The actual target of the attempts:- Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon.

Other wise known as "The lookout air raid".

I can think of some more recent events that would fit the bill, but doubt you have these in mind?

 

On researching this air raid, I came across some unconnected, but all the same interesting reading about "Weather Station Kurt" - Google it.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:13 PM
I know Japan had the balloons and bombs and cities being targets, but can't recall the second one.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:52 PM
OK, there were a couple of actual events in US history relating to the continental US being attacked from the air.  Two of these were most unusual in both the method and the intended targets.  Name the country of origin, the aircraft used, and the actual target of the attempts.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:30 AM

Well, the RLM had 6 Kestrel engines, and gave 2 to Messerschmitt, so that would make sense. 

As a bit of trivia, the correct name is the BF-109 not the ME-109, as the Bavarian Aircraft Works were given the title BF-109 - before they became Messerschmitt. However, the Germans themselves would mix the two designations, even sometimes on the same documents, or aircraft plates!

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:20 AM
And the Kestrel was used in the JU-87 prototype as well.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:27 AM

That's it F-8!  The Merlin and the Jumo 211, both the engines used in post developments of the BF-109, were both developments of the two engines used in the pre-war BF-109 prototypes.

Basically, the RLM specified the Junkers Jumo 210 as the standard engine for all the new German aircraft, and specified competions for 4 basic designs (tactical bomber, medium bomber, interceptor, twin-engined fighter), based on this engine.  Whilst the DB-600 series showed promise, it wasn't developed enough yet.  However, even the Jumo wasn't ready so the RLM obtained 6 Kestrel engines from Rolls-Royce, in exchance for a Heinkel He-70 Blitz, which they used as an engine test-bed.

Over to you F-8

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Sunday, September 27, 2009 12:49 AM

 osher wrote:
Close, very close, but, no, because neither the Merlin or the Jumo 211 were used in the BF-109 development.  However, you're on the right track, but you're missing a crucial fact, which both engines share, and it does involve the development, and these two engines, as such.

 

Well, the Merlin was a development of the Rolls Royce Kestrel, which was used in the prototype Me-109 V-1.  And the Jumo 211 was developed from the Jumo 210, which was the engine used for Me-109 prototypes V-2 through V-8.  the Jumo 210 also was used to power the production Me-109 -B, -C, and -D models.  The DB-601 and its further variants were not seen in production Me-109's until the -E model came out.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, September 26, 2009 10:50 AM
Close, very close, but, no, because neither the Merlin or the Jumo 211 were used in the BF-109 development.  However, you're on the right track, but you're missing a crucial fact, which both engines share, and it does involve the development, and these two engines, as such.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Buffalo NY
Posted by Thehannaman2 on Saturday, September 26, 2009 10:40 AM

Both engines were used in 109 prototypes.

 

Justen

"The distance between genius and insanity is measured only by success."

Member IPMS Niagara Frontier. "The BuffCon Boys."

IPMSUSA Member 45680 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, September 21, 2009 1:56 PM
Most keen aircraft enthusiasts will know that the BF-109 used for for WWII the DB-600 series engines.  Many will know that post war it also used the Merlin & Jumo 211 engines, in the Spanish and Czechslovakian built versions.  However, in a strange twist of fate, both those engines have a peculiar link to the BF-109, which is near identical.  What is this strange twist of fate (and remember, it's near identical for both engines)?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, September 21, 2009 12:13 PM

First come / first served  - I'm still at work, so I could be a while

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, September 21, 2009 10:52 AM
Milair you are the first to pipe in so go for it.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.