SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Monday, August 25, 2008 10:46 PM

Simpilot34 got it on the nose, and nicely done- I really like the exhibit he showed.

It's the same one in the Museum- it was subjected to a series of atom bomb blasts in 1952 through 1963, and then used in Broken Arrow weapons retreival practice. (Air + Space, June 2008). It was rediscovered, decontaminated and flown to Wright patterson, where it will be on display in that condition.

Ritchie, your turn.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:20 AM

Ok I'll try and not stuff up this one. We're only humanoids!Wink [;)]

What British bomber is capable of outmanoeuvering F-15's in high-altitude mock dogfights?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:31 AM
Canberra?
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:49 AM
No, sorry Brews
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:24 AM

Avro Vulcan?

From memory, the long retired EE Lightning can thrash it in a straight line as well!

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:51 AM

You got it Milair!!! Well done!! Yes, the massive wing area of the Vulcan can take a bigger bite on the thin air at altitude than the small wings of the Eagle. I don't think it would fair so well against a Raptor though.

Floor is yours Milair!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:05 PM
 bondoman wrote:

Simpilot34 got it on the nose, and nicely done- I really like the exhibit he showed...

 

You would, you whacked out airplane-nut-bar! Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:40 PM

Sorry for the delay!

This was a very hardy, high speed, low level strike (conv. or nuclear) aircraft, which for it era was as accurate as accurate could be. It was used in both land based & naval variants, featured a novel although not unique bomb bay, used advanced structural manufacturing & featured a rather involved method of making landing slightly easier. 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:57 PM
Sounds like the Buccaneer. If I remember correctly it had a rotating bomb bay and the airbrake in the tail would slow it down quick to ease landings.
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:47 PM

Yes, the Buccaneer.

I was sort of hoping some of our friends from the other side of the water would attempt this one & miss the Buccaneer.

The Buccaneer had a rotating bomb bay for opening at speed, used plenty of milled structural components & also featured a blown wing (Boundary layer control) to reduce landing speed - the rear petal air-brake was fitted to counteract the fact that the engines had to be spun up quite well to supply the blown wing with air.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, August 28, 2008 2:05 PM
Why is that airplane so ugly, or is it just me?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:05 PM

Cmon, it's hardly that ugly - look at this;

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:37 PM
 Milairjunkie wrote:

Cmon, it's hardly that ugly - look at this;

OH! You're sooo cyber-bopped for dising the venerable Gutless! One of the coolest Luft46 musings that ever made it to cut metal!

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:52 PM
Now the A-10 is an ugly airplane to be sure, built on the barn door theory. No matter how much you hang on it, it will fly! It's structural strength and firepower MORE than make up for it though!
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:40 PM

While we are on the subject, how is this for two European, carrier based, turboprop, ASW pigs in a poke;

(JPEG)

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, August 29, 2008 12:07 AM
Did someone say "ugly"?
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, August 29, 2008 12:41 AM

I did, and I'm really sorry because I didn't mean to hijack the post.Whistling [:-^]

The Buccaneer just astounds me though, because I understand that she is/was super capable, but omygod! I'd die of fright first if one were attacking me. OBTW, anyone know of a viddy of that one? Yeah, Youtube, I'm sure.

Time for the next question, I'd say and again mea culpa.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Friday, August 29, 2008 2:05 AM

 bondoman wrote:
Why is that airplane so ugly, or is it just me?

It's you, because the Buccaneer is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever build. Right after the Spitfire and the Hunter (I don't know why but brits make the best looking aircraft, just like russians often make mean and intimidating aircraft)

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Sunday, August 31, 2008 2:53 AM

Sorry for the delay in coming uo with a new question. Anyway; here it is.

 Supercruise, the ability to maintain supersonic speed without using an afterburner, is one of the features of the F-22 Raptor but which was the first aircraft to demonstrate this ability and in what year?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, August 31, 2008 3:12 AM
 RemcoGrob wrote:

 bondoman wrote:
Why is that airplane so ugly, or is it just me?

It's you, because the Buccaneer is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever build. Right after the Spitfire and the Hunter (I don't know why but brits make the best looking aircraft, just like russians often make mean and intimidating aircraft)

You've got to be kidding. The boundry vents, air brakes, double cockpit and folding wings spell "Harrier Mother-in-law", and heres your bangers!!!" In curlers.

I'll put the P-51 up against the 'Cane. Spit no issue, but the US comes back with the F-80, F-84 and F-86 as a three' fer. EE Lightning vs. Phantom II don't go there.

But really I'm a child of both traditions and Camm and Mitchell and Petter were brilliant, as were Kindleberger and Johnson and Douglas.

 

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Sunday, August 31, 2008 3:25 AM
It is the EE Lightning To first supercruise.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, August 31, 2008 3:32 AM
Mig-21
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:29 AM

Wikipoop lists this event as follows: The first turbine-powered aircraft to exceed Mach 1 in level flight without afterburners was the P.1 prototype of the English Electric Lightning, on August 4, 1954.

 

However, just to play the devil's advocate, wouldn't the flight of Chuck Yeager in the Bell X-1 on October 14, 1947 be considered the first supersonic flight without an afterburner? Tongue [:P]

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:18 AM

And another thing, why are you guys awake at 0'dark thirty in the morning?

 

Is that how you build so many models? Party [party]

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:27 PM

I'm with simpilot34 on this one, the hotrod EE Lightning, the prototype did this in 1954.

Dont forget that Concorde was doing it as a matter of course by the 70s & the TSR-2 was also at it in the 60s!

Shame the way the British aviation industry went really.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, September 1, 2008 2:59 AM
Oops!!Blush [:I] I didn't mention the year!!!! Well mojo when devros get's back to us with a decision I will give it to you as I have not completed the question as asked.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Monday, September 1, 2008 11:43 AM

 simpilot34 wrote:
Oops!!Blush [:I] I didn't mention the year!!!! Well mojo when devros get's back to us with a decision I will give it to you as I have not completed the question as asked.

You're right, Simpilot34. I was waiting to see if part two, of the quesrion, would be answered and Mojo got both parts so he has the honour of setting the next one.

 The Lightning is one mighty fine aircraft, in my opinion. Out performing its competitors for thirty years of its life. It had the ability to intercept the U-2 which is an amazing feat.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Monday, September 1, 2008 2:46 PM

Alrighty, I'll toss out this one if it hasn't been done before.

What is it?

 

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 5:04 AM

It's the Blackburn F.3, one of the aircraft made for the F.7/30 fighter specification of the RAF.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 8:11 AM

Blackburn F.3 it is!

 

The radiator is in that space between the wing and the fuse. Interesting, but one that I thought went along with the ugly theme that was developing! Wink [;)]

Here is another view. Definitely Blackburn, eh?

 

 

What's up next RemcoGrob?

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.