SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Ship Trivia Quiz

452450 views
3119 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Los Angeles
Posted by dostacos on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:20 PM

second hint. I was named after the President of my company and I carried passengers and freight on the Chesapeake Bay between Baltimore, Maryland and Norfolk, Virginia from 1928 until July 12, 1942

 

what are my NAMES 

Dan support your 2nd amendment rights to keep and arm bears!
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Los Angeles
Posted by dostacos on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:23 AM
first hint, it started out hauling passengers and cargo
Dan support your 2nd amendment rights to keep and arm bears!
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Los Angeles
Posted by dostacos on Monday, May 19, 2008 3:39 PM
 RickF wrote:

Well done - but I thought it would take longer than an hour! I visited Fort Rinella on Malta last year, where the 100-ton Armstrong gun is preserved.

Over to you, dostacos

Rick

I am looking for a ship that started in the private sector {built in 1928}, transfered to the  Royal Navy, then back to the US NAVY and ended under another flag.

names of the ship.....

Dan support your 2nd amendment rights to keep and arm bears!
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Monday, May 19, 2008 3:24 AM

Well done - but I thought it would take longer than an hour! I visited Fort Rinella on Malta last year, where the 100-ton Armstrong gun is preserved.

Over to you, dostacos

Rick

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Los Angeles
Posted by dostacos on Sunday, May 18, 2008 7:30 PM
Gibraltar & Malta each had 2 very large {450 mm 100 ton guns} mounted to defend against the Battleship Duilio, the guns where manufactured in Newcastle upon Tyne by Lord Armstrong's company
Dan support your 2nd amendment rights to keep and arm bears!
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Sunday, May 18, 2008 6:24 PM

OK, here's a really obscure one, which I hope will get you all guessing.

What connects Newcastle upon Tyne, Gibraltar, Malta and the Italian battleship Duilio (1876)?

Rick

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Sunday, May 18, 2008 7:52 AM
Correct answer, Rick. You're up.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Friday, May 16, 2008 6:20 PM

USS Charger (CVE-30) had three  sister ships - HMS Avenger, HMS Biter and HMS Dasher, transferred to the RN under Lend-Lease. All were converted merchant ships .

Charger's area of operations throughout the war was Cheasapeake Bay as a training ship for pilots and ships' crews in carrier operations. She was converted back to a merchant ship after the war. Avenger and Dasher were both sunk. Biter was sold to France in 1945.

Rick

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, May 16, 2008 2:48 PM
Nope, sorry dostacos. The key in this one is that the US ship stayed in the Chesapeake Bay for the war. These ships were a different class of CVE.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Los Angeles
Posted by dostacos on Friday, May 16, 2008 1:09 PM

 subfixer wrote:
Well, we don't want any breath that has bait in it, so, here's a hint: they were CVEs.

  • (CVE-6) Altamaha became HMS Battler
  • (CVE-7) Barnes became HMS Attacker
  • (CVE-8) Block Island became HMS Hunter

  • (CVE-9) Bogue

 

Dan support your 2nd amendment rights to keep and arm bears!
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, May 16, 2008 11:46 AM
Well, we don't want any breath that has bait in it, so, here's a hint: they were CVEs.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Rowland Heights, California
Posted by Duke Maddog on Friday, May 16, 2008 11:16 AM

I'm interested. Very! I jusst have no clue. My searches have turned up nothing so far. I'm waiting and watching with bated breath. 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, May 16, 2008 6:06 AM
No nibbles? Anyone need a hint or a nudge? Or, just not interested?

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:25 PM

Thanks Rick, but from what I understand, the America's stern anchor was indeed due to the sonar. She had to have two and as a second bow anchor would somehow interfere with the sonar dome, the second was placed at her stern.

Next question: What three Royal Navy ships had a US Navy sister that lived in the Chesapeake Bay throughout WWII?

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Seattle, WA
Posted by Surface_Line on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:45 AM

true - it was America - thus the bow anchor.  (I didn't know about the stern anchor and that wouldn't have been related to the sonar outfit.  fascinating.)

over to you, finally.  I must restrain myself from answering if I don't have a question prepared.

Rick 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:24 AM
I believe it was the USS America (CV-66), but it was removed in the early eighties. She also had a stern anchor, which was unique, and one bow anchor instead of two.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Seattle, WA
Posted by Surface_Line on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:58 AM

Really sorry, folks.  I've been cursed with trivia block.  And this may be worse than nothing.

What U.S. carrier since WWII was fitted with ASW sonar?  (not just fitted with spaces for sonar, but actually fitted with the equipment and manned with the Sonar Technicians?) 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Newnan, Ga
Posted by bostonbruins34 on Monday, May 12, 2008 6:40 PM
This thread is moving along about the same pace as a 3 masted ship with no sails...Whistling [:-^]
The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, "I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it." Group Build
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Monday, May 12, 2008 3:37 PM
Hey! Rick!  It's your turn for a question!!

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by Repulse36 on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 5:15 PM

Which makes the answer TRUE--there is no actual Midway Island. Please re-read my question.

However, your explanation outweighs your mistaken entry of "False, strictly", so despite your slip, you get it right (but please don't attempt this in a court of law!Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg])

It has long been a pet peeve of mine to see or hear the term "Midway Island" being used in describing the atoll, in text and film accounts of the battle. 

Okay Rick, good job! I guess it's your question next, I'm tapped-out for awhile!

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Seattle, WA
Ship Trivia
Posted by Surface_Line on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 12:38 PM

False, strictly.  Midway Atoll is composed primarily of Sand Island and Eastern Island.  There is no particular chunk of land named Midway Island.

Rick 

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by Repulse36 on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 12:11 PM

In 1942, the epic Battle of Midway was fought in the Pacific between Japanese and United States forces.

True or false: There is actually no Midway Island at that location.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Moorefield, WV
Posted by billydelawder on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 11:09 PM
Close enough. Repulse, you have the floor fir the next question
  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by Repulse36 on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 10:47 PM

Turrets and mountings from Glorious and Courageous.

Her actual guns came from different ships. As these weapons wore down from firing, they were removed from their particular ships and refurbished, then stored away as spares and eventually supplied to other ships as replacements. By the time Vanguard came along, only 1 of her guns was from either Glorious or Courageous, the rest having been swapped-out among a number of other warships over the years.

There is an article I once read on the subject with more information on this, but my notes on it are buried somewhere (this is not an answer to the question, just an expansion on ddp's previous answer).

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 4:52 PM
glorious & courageous
  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by Repulse36 on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 12:30 PM

Yes, Billy answers correctly. BTW, I did not mean to imply I even had a question, but was just curious if all new questions had to come from winning answerers within what appeared to me a rather small group. I thank you for allowing me to post!

Mine was carefully worded because, long before the IJN mounted their 18.1" guns to Yamato and Musashi, HMS Furious was fitted with a single 18" to her aft barbette, and was the only aircraft carrier once fitted with such a massive gun. 

According to Nathan Okun's "Navweaps" site, one of the only three British 18" guns produced was mounted aboard the monitor General Wolfe. While it is unclear whether or not Wolfe's gun was the one removed from Furious, the monitor holds the record for the longest hit ever fired from a Royal Navy warship (36,000 yards), although it was against a land target in Belgium.

Based on the above, the British were apparently the only navy ever to successfully score a hit with an 18" gun, against an enemy target. The IJN fired their 18.1" guns at Leyte Gulf but never scored a hit before turning away to evade torpedoes (Yamato). Japanese 18.1" ordnance was also fired against aircraft, but I don't believe these resulted in any direct hits, either (if I'm wrong, I apologize).

Interesting bits of trivia, to be sure--unless they are factually in error.

My 2 cents [2c] 

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Moorefield, WV
Posted by billydelawder on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 12:03 PM

So, was i close enough? If i am, here's the next q:

 

The 15 inch gun mountings for HMS Vanguard were ones that had been removed from what 2 ships? 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 10:45 AM
I agree that Furious carried an 18" gun, it was removed after a trial period because the hull couldn't handle the recoil. I was thinking along the lines of ships carrying guns that they could effectively handle. Congrats to you, Billy.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Moorefield, WV
Posted by billydelawder on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 10:34 AM
HMS Furious carried an 18 incher.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 9:52 AM
That question is a little tricky. The largest caliber gun ever fitted to an "active warship". The 18" guns of the Yamato class battleship were the largest that saw action that I know of. The IJN Shinano was a Yamato but I don't believe she was ever fitted with those guns. The hybrids Ise and Hyuga carried 14 inchers but weren't really fleet carriers. The Akagi and maybe a few others had 8 inch guns and were fleet carriers.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.