SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

75th Anniversary of 1942 (World at War)

39074 views
860 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Monday, August 10, 2020 2:51 PM

Steve:  I posted a photo, and I'll be glad to swap it out whenever you finish the figure.

I asked about Vallejo, cuz I've been trying to use it for some 28mm figures, and I'm finding it a steep learning curve.

Thanks for adding to the GB!  Always a pleasure to have your participation and see your work!

 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Tempe AZ
Posted by docidle on Sunday, August 9, 2020 9:07 PM

Thank you sir! If you post one now and when I get the dude finished then I’ll post better shots and you can swap them out if you would please and thank you. This is actually my first tank in 53 years. 

You are so right, I use Vallejo Model Colors for figures as they lay out so well. Thanks for hosting this great group build!

Steve

       

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Sunday, August 9, 2020 1:20 PM

Well-done, Steve.  You achieved a well-worn, veteran appearance.  It does look like it's been through the wars!  I've always liked the little Stuart!

Do you want me to post a photo now, or do you want to wait till you've painted the figure?  I could post now, and swap out the finish photo when you're done with the little guy.

What sort of paint are you going to use?  Vallejo?  Or something else?

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Tempe AZ
Posted by docidle on Saturday, August 8, 2020 10:30 PM

FINALLY finished this little bugger! I weathered the heck out of it to look like she’s been out rec out in the desert of North Africa. I still need to paint the figure.

Steve

 

 

       

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Sunday, May 3, 2020 11:33 PM

I’ll keep that mix formula in mind. And yes, i know how custom mixes go... Even if you do mix at the same ratios, there is often a slight variation... your mileage may vary. I still have two more Desert Pink builds to do someday, and I don’t think that my bottle of the color will suffice for all three. But who knows...

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Sunday, May 3, 2020 3:59 PM

stikpusher

Tomcat your Liberator turned out pretty darned sharp! The paint work and markings look great! What color did you use for the Desert Pink/Sand? That really nails the color. Yeah, thats a bit of a goof on the main gear legs, but everything else looking so good draws your attention away from that. Hard to believe that this ancient Revell kit can look so nice. 

First of all thanks to all for the positive comments. Back in the past, the thought of or should I say fear of screwing up a model is what caused me not to persue the hobby for 30 years. Now, I chalk up the experience to "lessons learned" and move on.

Stick: The paint color is a custom mix of sand and red. I actually read that in a B-24 build review on the "Modeling Madnes" website. So here is a picture of the paints I used. 

Simply add the red a drop at a time until the "Sand" starts to change color...

Just one word of caution. Unless you keep track of the exact formula measurements, you had better make enough paint in one batch, because if you run out, then repeating the same formula to obtain an exact match would be next to impossible. But, I'm sure you probably know that. Big Smile

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Thursday, April 30, 2020 8:32 PM

Got the photo posted, Mark.  I used the one that shows the side with nose art.

Thanks again for your participation.  You'd never know the kit is as old as it is.  You did a remarkable job with it.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    August 2015
  • From: the redlands Fl
Posted by crown r n7 on Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:38 PM

I agree a fine paint job on a very old kit. Yes

 

 

 Nick.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:05 PM

Tomcat your Liberator turned out pretty darned sharp! The paint work and markings look great! What color did you use for the Desert Pink/Sand? That really nails the color. Yeah, thats a bit of a goof on the main gear legs, but everything else looking so good draws your attention away from that. Hard to believe that this ancient Revell kit can look so nice. 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Thursday, April 30, 2020 6:07 PM

Thanks for the kind words. I guess it didn't turn out too bad Lol.

I was concentrating on keeping that nose wheel on the ground and didn't pay enough attention to the main gear.

I think picture #1 or 8 would work. Thanks for letting me participate. Now onto 1944.

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 5:47 PM

That turned out beautifully, Mark.  What a great finish, paint scheme and markings.  It's a mightily appealing Liberator!

As far as the landing gear, it's not obvious in the photos.  The last B-24 I built, I installed the vertical stabilizers upside down.  In my defense, the instructions showed them incorrectly.  Fortunately I had some spares in the box, but I had to re-order the decals.

Great model!  What photo would you life for the finish roster?  You've got a number of good shots to choose from.

Thanks for your participation and completion of the GB!

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3:57 PM

Have you ever had one of those builds where you are almost finished when you realised you've made a horrible mistake? Well on this Liberator I had mine. The painting, decalling and weathering was finished, as I was adding the last few delicate pieces when I noticed it. I was adding the landing gear doors onto the struts when something didn't seem right. They weren't going into position properly when it hit me what I had done and then I yelled "O...H.......F...U...D...G...E!!!". Only I didn't say fudge!  I cemented the landing gear in BACKWARDS! Thats right, backwards.These suckers are really on there. I can't remove them without snapping them off. I am so close to finishing this thing I have decided to say to heck with it.

So if you'll excuse my faux pau, here it is. It turned out OK otherwise, excet for the upper turrent which seems way too tall..

See here, the landing gear strut should face outbooard. Oh, God...

Well there you have it warts and all. I'll be on the lookout for a junk kit or partial build to scavage some new lading gears and some day I'll fix it. But for now, I'll just pick my self up, dust myself off and soldier on to my next build, a little wiser. Embarrassed

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Saturday, April 18, 2020 9:42 PM

Excellent work, Mark.  That's a lovely shade of pink!Yes

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Friday, April 17, 2020 11:19 AM

An update on the Liberator...

Touch ups are done, the gloss has been applied and the decal process has begun...

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Friday, April 10, 2020 2:22 PM

Looks good,  Mark.  Nice shade of pink.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Thursday, April 9, 2020 11:15 PM

I've got the Liberator into paint. First Neutral grey overall. The bottom half and undersides of the bird will stay this color and the grey will serve as the primer for the upper half to be painted sand....that was faded to desert pink...

Undersides masked and ready for the sand...

Pink now applied...

After it dries, I'll remove the masking and make the enevitable touchups, then soldier on.  

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Monday, April 6, 2020 4:21 PM

Good job, Mark!  The few Liberators I've built always mocked my efforts to get them to sit on their nose wheel.  

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Sunday, April 5, 2020 11:58 AM

Made some progress on the Liberator. Major assemblie completed...

This plane will be a tail dragger unless I add weight to ther nose. I added a fake bulkhead behind the the pilot deck and bombadier, then back filled behind and below wityh lead split shot weight...

Then I taped together the fuselage and tail. I inserted the wings, held my breath and et it down...

...success! No tail dragger here. now I can glue together the fuselage, tail and wings...

 

Fill some gaps then off to paint...

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Sunday, December 1, 2019 12:36 PM

I've always liked the boxy look of the Liberator.  Makes a lot of sense to build as sub-assemblies.

Hope you have success with the nose-weight, Mark.  

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Sunday, December 1, 2019 12:16 PM

Starting to dig into this Liberator. Paint and decals have been secured...

I think I'm going to takle this as a series of sub assemblies, wings, fuselage, and tail. The biggest problem will be adding (and disguising) enough weight to the nose to make it sit properly.

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Monday, November 25, 2019 5:19 PM

Well, the base is nice.

The front page is updated, Tony.  Thanks for your participation in the GB.  Always good to have you around.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Australia
Posted by taxtp on Monday, November 25, 2019 5:27 AM
Thanks CMK. To be honest, I thought the base was better than the figure. I don't mind which photo. Cheers Tony

I'm just taking it one GB at a time.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Saturday, November 23, 2019 12:07 PM

Nice job, Tony.  Good paintwork, effective shading and highlights!

Do you have a preference for the front page?

I'll take off the Buffalo.

Thanks for being part of the GB.  It's always a pleasure to see the work you do.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Australia
Posted by taxtp on Monday, November 18, 2019 6:11 PM

As I continue to catch up on the GBs that I've missed, I find that I've completed the Coree Productions Hans Joachim Marseille figure. I'm not going to build the Buffalo any time soon, please delete it from the roster. Here are my photos.

Cheers

Tony

I'm just taking it one GB at a time.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Thursday, September 12, 2019 4:17 PM

Mark:  I've added the Liberator to the build roster.  

You are bringing back memories with your build.  Revell's 1/72 line was pretty innovative when they came out.  They had quite a number of WWI and WWII planes.  And the great thing was the consistent scale.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: South west, PA
Posted by Tomcat on Wednesday, September 11, 2019 7:08 PM

My World at War 1942 group build entry will be this American workhorse...

Mark aka Tomcat

On the workbench: Monogram 1/24 '69 Pontiac GTO and a Monogram 1/67 (box scale) B-26 Invader

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Monday, August 20, 2018 3:34 PM

Hi, Eric.

I have your T-34 included in the 1943 GB, not the 1942 GB.  It still appears in the finished-photo roster in 1943, safe and sound.

For the 1942 GB, I have you listed for a Panzer IVD and a Wildcat, both of which you finished, and the photos are posted.

Sorry for any confusion!  Embarrassed  I wasn't aware that any threads were having problems, except for the late, lamented photobucket scandal.  

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Monday, August 20, 2018 3:26 PM

Thanks, Steve.  Finished photo is posted.  Thanks for being part of the GB.  Hope the plane arrives at it's destination safely.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Sunday, August 19, 2018 11:02 PM

Glad to see the GB is back - for the moment anyway. We've lost at least six weeks of posts - the Commonwealth GB lost more. Knock on wood I guess. On the front, I note that my T-34 is absent. So for archival purposes, I repost my final reveal on that kit.

 

OK: I think we have a wrap on the Kusk T-34/76.

 

Kit: 1/35 ICM T-34/76

 

Paints: Golden High Flow Acrylics

 

Weathering: Vallejo Washes, Vallejo Acrylic Weathering Effects, Wilder AquaLine Weathering Products, Medea Com.Art Paints, Sennelier pigments. MIG oils

 

Base: PVC Foamboard, Sculptamold, Static Grass – GrassTech USA Applicator I & WWS Weathering Products (2mm, 4mm, 6mm grasses) & Silfor prepared 10mm clumps.

 

 

 00kursk by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 0base-tnk-n2! by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 

This build turned was longer and more complex than I planned. Normally I find the greatest challenge in trying to evoke a historic artifact as realistically as possible – splendid modelers like Mig Jimenez argue this approach is both impossible and no fun. I'll live with the impossible – that's inherent in modeling – and enjoy trying to catch a bit of reality. Aside from that, I don't have the graphic skills to create some of the really fancy effects often seen by elite armor modelers and now even in airplanes. (AMMO/MIG published a jaw-dropping book on aircraft weathering by Jamie Haggo which I found well worth the money. Check Phil Flory's channel for an hour chat with the gent. Remarkable stuff done with panache and skill. But real? No, but if you can master those techniques you could tone things down easily. This is not a right/wrong matter.) Ship modelers, perhaps because of the time required on their builds, are much too restrained in my view, at least when picturing warships in heavy action.

 

 

But on this build I wanted to follow the bouncing ball on a 23 episode KV-1 build sequence on YouTube done by Adam Wilder, my favorite AFV guru. So this meant trying to create acrylic equivalents of the multitude of steps produced by Adam often using enamels. Overall, as Wilder himself points out, one doesn't need 22 weathering steps to make a good kit. I just thought I'd try it. I've done bases before and I thought I'd give static grass applied with an electric/ion applicator a try – another new. In other words, I spent a lot of time trying things out. I learned a lot and hope it will pay off down the road. So this was a kind of self-tutorial. I don't think I did much damage throwing everything but the kitchen sink at my humble T-34.

 

 

But there was history always in the background. This is a 1943 build, and that means Kursk, especially if you've never built a T-34. (That was me.) The model presented here by ICM was very late 42/early 43 and would have been at Kursk in large numbers. Russians went through tanks fast. Ironically, one of these models could have been a veteran in Russian terms because of the long lull in the East after the early 43 thaw and Manstein's recapture of Kharkov. Once Hitler decided on a 1943 offensive (there was opposition in OKH) the Germans needed to get everything they could to the East to launch an offensive. (It's true Manstein wanted to hit the Kursk salient created by his Kharkov victory in May, but with the strength then available it could only have been a “spoiling attack.” A substantial victory needed more tanks, troops and planes of all types – not just the Panthers and Tigers.) Stalin decided to stand on the defensive which meant an unusually long delay: fun started on July 4. During May/June the Soviets built a multitude of defenses in the Kurk area. The salient was about half the size of England. Was that big? It did dwarf Normandy. But it was much smaller than the Stalingrad/Baku front of 1942, which in turn was much smaller than Barbarossa in 1941. You can see what direction the war was following. Nevertheless a million Soviet troops plus were inside the salient – and more just to the west, northwest (Orel) and southwest (Belgorod). The Orel counter-blow of mid-July was a devastating German defeat almost lost to history because of the more famous failue at Kursk proper. When another counter-blow started south of the salient around August 1, the entire German front was sent fleeing to the Dnieper and Leningrad liberated.

 

 

What this meant was that a Russian tank preparing for Citadel would have spent weeks in intensive training. Russian dispositions were changed on an almost weekly basis depending upon fresh intelligence. Everyone would have been moving around a lot. And people were digging. Hundreds of miles of trenches and new roads were built inside the salient including defensive positions of every type. There was a lot of rain, a lot of sun and a megaton of dust. This was the steppe. Under normal circumstances there would have been huge areas cultivated with grain, but with the local population digging this would have been largely fallow ground. But if you look at pics of the battlefield you can see thick grasses all over – probably a lot of it wheat that had planted itself. It was July, so I'm thinking the foliage would have had summer colors. But it would have been spare on trees and no major urban areas outside of Kursk itself. So I was thinking dust, dry mud, serious wear but not damage like missing fenders. There were hundreds of tanks inside the salient and many were literally “dug in.” That would have made a neat base but hid the tank, so I put a well worn T-34 “hull down” on a road behind a mound of earth and pretty dense grass. I think in the real world, the tank would have looked for a little more earth to guard everything but the turret, but that too would have hid the model. In any case, if you check the Kursk photo above, I think you can get the idea.

 

 

Back to the tank. Gurus like Wilder and Mike Rinaldi talk about “layering” a tank's weathering. Actually as the steps built up, you could see what they were getting at. Here's the base coat (I didn't keep the exact recipe – think it was platho blue, cadmium yellow, raw umber and SAP green):

 

 meld! by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

Here's how it looked after filters, oil dots and chipping. I was actually a little worried about the chipping getting out of hand:

 

 chip1 by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

I admit that I elminated some chips with base coat, but not many. What followed was extra fading, streaking (with Com.Art, Vallejo Washes and Wilder's acrylic stuff) and very complex layered pigments. The result is quite different:

 

 1aRT-tank by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 1blft-tank by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 

Here are some close ups – the surface is much richer than anything else I've done in armor.

 

 1D-FT-O! by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 1D-Rear-O by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 1Det-Tur-Top! by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 

As noted I wanted a base. This vignette really needed static grass and so I got some. This is different stuff from usual flock which is normally some kind of colored sawdust. Instead it's nylon fiber. You attach an electronic gizmo to a nail in the base which creates static electricity, and you dust static grass out of a round sieve on the gizmo (carefully – a shock would wake you up). And sure enough, the stuff stands up. I used static grass from a Brit company WWS in sizes of 2mm, 4mm and 6mm in four different colors. I added some prepared 10mm clumps from the pricey company Silfor – you'd need a larger applicator to apply 10mm grass. The base is PVC Board. This stuff is a real find. It's very light, doesn't warp and is very strong. You cut it with several passes with a good utility knife, so it's much tougher than foam board, but much easier to use wood products. I bought a 12X12X3” piece on Amazon for $6 and have enough left over for another tank dio. The stuff is often used to back photos or make signs – it's much cheaper by bulk. Definite thumbs up, although I'll stay with styrofoam for sea bases. Here's the base and a detail pic:

 

 2base2 by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 2base1 by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 2grass-D by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 

Well, below are some pics of the tank on the base and that's it. I hope to get another tank in on this GB before year's end (Panther or Sherman – not sure). But next up, is an Airfix Tomahawk done in Desert Air Force colors that I owe Bish for the Commonwealth build.

 

Eric

 

 3lft-rearV by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 3lft-ft-V by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 3-RTFT-V! by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 3R-R-V by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 L-Vig! by Eric Bergerud, on Flickr

 

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    July 2014
Posted by modelcrazy on Sunday, August 19, 2018 10:55 PM

Thanks D and Check Embarrassed. If I can get it up to Boise in one piece (or more accurately, 3) I can hopefully find someone who is going to the Salt Lake show on the 22nd and take it with them. My wife and I are going the opposite direction that weekend to the coast near Seattle so I won't be personally attending.

Check, I  think the first or second one will do fine, thank you.

Steve

Building a kit from your stash is like cutting a head off a Hydra, two more take it's place.

 

 

http://www.spamodeler.com/forum/

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.