SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Fleet Air Arm Group Build

729078 views
11139 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: A secret workshop somewhere in England
Posted by TANGO 1 on Saturday, January 17, 2009 3:56 PM

Thanks Frank.Approve [^]

We had an amazing day and I am looking forward to more of them. I must say I am very geared up for some FAA builds this year! I have some very special builds planned.Wink [;)]

However, my present US Navy build will also be worth waiting for-wait 'til you see what I'm gonna do!! Big Smile [:D]

Then, I have another GB to do...........one that a good friend invited me to join.Wink [;)]

Regards, Darren. C.A.G. FAA/USNFAW GB
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Saturday, January 17, 2009 3:57 PM

 Hmmmmm I get home from a long weeks work and my first stopping point is over here at the FAA to see what I have missed?  Uh Uh....... Great work on the Hellcat!  Love the bug! The Devastator is making me want to do one! CAG Jr looks just like his daddy! Maybe a bit better looking with that big smile!Big Smile [:D] Of course that little outting on the Ark Royal was a real treat! Very historic ship and great pics Darren!

Sean I'm not sure about that picture, something not kosher about it, if you ask me. It does explain why Dee was dressed all in pork when I got home. She used bologna though. Confused [%-)] Well a mans gotta do what a man has to do!

Why am I working on torpedos? Oh yeah! Mischief [:-,]

Oh yeah forgot about the pretty red Corsair racer!  That is really cool!  Tell Katie I like her outfit! All camoflauged and army like. Cept for the flowers!

Frank how long did you have to dig to find a pic where you wore a different shirt? Nice gams btw! Tongue [:P]

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: A secret workshop somewhere in England
Posted by TANGO 1 on Saturday, January 17, 2009 4:00 PM
Big Smile [:D]Big Smile [:D]Big Smile [:D]
Regards, Darren. C.A.G. FAA/USNFAW GB
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Inland Northwest
Posted by Summit on Saturday, January 17, 2009 10:33 PM

Does anyone have a canopy mask set for the 1/48 Monogram TBD-1 Devastator that they do not need ? The frames are so lightly molded I can barely make them out through the Friskit Film. I checked - Squadron, Sprue Bros and ebay , none to be found. 

I had a BLT sandwhich for Dinner tonight, Big Deal you say  - Well this was the first "meat" I have eaten in two years. For some reason I had been craving bacon all day. 

Sean "I've reached nearly fifty years of age with my system." Weekend GB 2008
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Casa Grande, Az.
Posted by DesertRat on Sunday, January 18, 2009 2:20 AM
vegetarian?

Warmest regards,

Roger

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:51 AM
SSSSSSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!Laugh [(-D]
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by namrednef on Sunday, January 18, 2009 7:27 AM

 

sorry I've been away.....packing for a MOVE!

Darren....great pics that seem to justify our existence!Thumbs Up [tup]

Bacon Sandwiches?.....They should be on the list of "Must Eat"!

(with a tumbler of rum Pirate [oX)])

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:37 PM

Whistling [:-^]

Big Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: UK
Posted by gregers on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:42 PM

Great looking PBY. nice one good sir.

HMMMM sliced dead pig. sounds delicious. me off to raid the fridge now Dinner [dinner]

All the best.

Greg

(you getting cravings Sean mate?. your not preggers are you old chap Sign - Oops [#oops] Big Smile [:D]

Why torture yourself when life will do it for you?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Inland Northwest
Posted by Summit on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:46 PM

Aaron - Fabulous Bow [bow] I really like it..The only bad thing about your posting is   - I have a certain blue plane on my bench I was looking over. It can go back up on the top shelf to make way for the "PBY's" Thumbs Up [tup]

Great in-flight pics - you need to utilize Trexx's idea of using the "blow" feature on a vacuum cleaner to spin the props. 

Sean "I've reached nearly fifty years of age with my system." Weekend GB 2008
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Inland Northwest
Posted by Summit on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:48 PM
 gregers wrote:

(you getting cravings Sean mate?. your not preggers are you old chap Sign - Oops [#oops] Big Smile [:D]

Ha - according to my Wife she thinks I look it. Sheesh I have gained two pounds since I parked my Mtn Bike...Disapprove [V]

Sean "I've reached nearly fifty years of age with my system." Weekend GB 2008
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: South Central Wisconsin
Posted by Daywalker on Sunday, January 18, 2009 4:14 PM
 sfcmac wrote:

Oh yeah forgot about the pretty red Corsair racer!  That is really cool!  Tell Katie I like her outfit! All camoflauged and army like. Cept for the flowers!

Frank how long did you have to dig to find a pic where you wore a different shirt? Nice gams btw! Tongue [:P]

 

ROTFLMFAO That was hysterical Aaron!  Took a LOOOOOOONG time to find a photo of me w/o the flannel. Laugh [(-D]

About this PBY... OUTSTANDING WORK MATE!!!  You ought to be rightly proud of that build.  That is a seriously gorgeous build. Bow [bow]

Well, the twins got put away for a bit.  They have really been fighting me, and today I tried to mask the canopies and attach them.  I had given them two coats of Future, but the windscreen on one of them fogged anyway when I tried to CA it to the fuselage.  Also, the Eduard masks for this version are POS's.  I have had some from them that fit perfectly, others look like they took a wild guess with them- these are the latter.  The -1D masks fit quite well (except the top pane of the sliding portion).  So, I decided to pack them up for a bit. Sigh [sigh]

Frank 

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: The Great State of Wyoming
Posted by wyoroy on Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:57 PM

Aaron, the PBY looks fantastic.

Roy (Capt. Wyoroy FAAGB/USNFAWGB)

John 3:16

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Sunday, January 18, 2009 7:40 PM
Hey thanks Sean, Gregers, Frank and Roy! It was great fun too!  If anyomne hasn't checked out Nam's shamless PBY GB there is a history and in progress pics over yonder!  Roy you may not realize this but your battle with the washes was a great influence on how I weathered the PBY! 
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: The Great State of Wyoming
Posted by wyoroy on Sunday, January 18, 2009 8:24 PM
Happy my trouble has helped someoneWink [;)]  I'm a convert to the Promodeler Wash.  I still have not given up on the oil wash.  I will keep trying to I master it.

Roy (Capt. Wyoroy FAAGB/USNFAWGB)

John 3:16

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Sunday, January 18, 2009 10:45 PM

Aaron, awesome PBY!! Thumbs Up [tup]Thumbs Up [tup]Thumbs Up [tup]  I checked it out over in the PBY group build too.  Quite the whirlwind build.  Did you clone Guys elves or did you chain them to your workbench?

Sean, you would think all that snow shovelling would keep you in fighting trim over the winter.

Dave

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, January 19, 2009 6:29 AM

As I said on the PBY GB That is an AWESOME build Mate!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stunning work my friend!!!!!!Bow [bow]Thumbs Up [tup]Thumbs Up [tup]Thumbs Up [tup]Make a Toast [#toast]Pirate [oX)] Been watching this one come together and what a beautiful finish!!!!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Casa Grande, Az.
Posted by DesertRat on Monday, January 19, 2009 7:19 AM
Awesome build, Aaron! At first glance going through the previous posts, I'd thought it was the real thing in flight for a split second! Very well done!Thumbs Up [tup]

Warmest regards,

Roger

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Monday, January 19, 2009 7:43 AM
Aaron awesome build on the pBY. 

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: UK
Posted by gregers on Monday, January 19, 2009 8:50 AM

I've had to put the Sea Lightning away for a few days. firstly, I did second coats on both main colours and they have gone patchy, repaint ain't too much hassle though, fixed the undercariage and despite all the lead in the nose it still tailsits, much hacking and stuff to open up the engine fronts to get more lead in them, there was already some in but there is room for a little more. then some ham fisted idiot (yep, ME!!!) broke the arrestor hook in half. new one made and fitted. all this has got me pretty pissed with this build so I am leaving it alone for a few days. I'm working on some builds for a show in a few weeks and may be able to squeeze a quick Sea Hurricane or something in in the mean time. piccies will be taken when the paint and other P.I.T.A issues are sorted.

All the best.

Greg

Why torture yourself when life will do it for you?
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Monday, January 19, 2009 9:46 AM

 Gotta couple of my own that I am miffed at as well there Gregers! I am sure you will get the best of it after a wee break,.

Thanks for all the kind words Everyone!  That Nam is a killer task master! Put me on Bread and water until I finished it!  The busty Bondo is helping me out with some nose issues that were not clear in the picture of the actual Aircraft.  Hey and it's NAVY! Flown by Marines! The Commander of the Cactus Airforce on Guadalcanal.

Catching up on a few more GB's then Frank is gonna motivate me to get back on that FM Ventura!  I got so much I want to do it is driving me bonkers!

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by namrednef on Monday, January 19, 2009 11:45 AM

 

Gave you your just desserts over in the PBY GB Aaron. Really beautiful build!

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Monday, January 19, 2009 12:47 PM

 Nam! So glad to see you! Had you not replyied to the PM's I'd had been worried!  Never know what that Bondo has planned for you since he took you bungie jumping off the Golden Gate with a gaffing hook in your undies! That be a wedgie none of use will soon forget!  Things legends are made of!  Your voice should be back to normal in a few days but hey in the meantime you can pass yourself off as Alvin the CHipmonk! Mischief [:-,]Pirate [oX)]

So glad to hear your plans are set to move and sounds like a great place! Keep us posted and best wishes!Thumbs Up [tup]

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Monday, January 19, 2009 1:06 PM

Yeah and we did go waterskiing in the submarine, but halfway there he went outside for a smoke....

Nam, sounds like a good situation, and I assume the Middies are welcome as well!

CAG I'm coming up dry on research on FAW Whitleys- apparently there were only two used as Merlin training birds, so not much fun there. In search of a subject.

Aaron, I like your painting techniques- sort of "painters pallette", freely mixing medias.

Arrggghhh had to work today, the curse of free enterprise, but I'm off tomorrow morning, then in for a conference call so hopefully I'll be sober.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Inland Northwest
Posted by Summit on Monday, January 19, 2009 1:34 PM

TBD-1 Devastator Update - I am down to doing the "punch~list" going through the instructions.  Checking each part to make sure it is where it should be or has been painted and waiting final assembly. This bird will be seeing a clear coat in a few hours Thumbs Up [tup] Recent work has been the painting of the underside wing tips, and the black "walk way's" on the topside.

TBD-05

TBD-06 I also have been "relaxing" by masking the almost non~detectable canopy lines !Laugh [(-D]

Sean "I've reached nearly fifty years of age with my system." Weekend GB 2008
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Monday, January 19, 2009 2:35 PM

Nam, best of luck to you in your move and settling into the new place.  Hope everything goes smoothly.

Sean, the SBD is looking great but what is that huge line in the fuse underside at the front?  I didn't realize that the SBD's had that corrugated metal look on their wings either. Guess I need to build one of those to familiarize myself with it more!  Wink [;)]Big Smile [:D]

Dave

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Monday, January 19, 2009 2:55 PM

 Looking good Sean! You have been going to town!  Got a production line a going!

 Perhaps The CAG! Himself may know the answer to the PBY mystery? 

My question was did the PBY Catalina serve with the FAA or was it souly RAF and Coastal Command?  Sir Bondo has found a link that shows it and some others I had not suspected as being used by the FAA. I can find to photos to substanciate this claim however and ask your wise counsel on this matter.

Hey if it's British? Ask an Englishman right?

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Monday, January 19, 2009 3:32 PM

Aaron, you should check out this site http://www.fleetairarmarchive.net/Aircraft/Aircraftindex.htm but I'm afraid that they do not mention the Catalina in FAA service at all.  You should also note that Canada also manufactured catalina's under the name of "Canso".  Most served with costal command but I did read one account of an RCAF pilot flying catalina's out of Ceylon but didn't give the unit he was flying with.  I know, I'm not much help. Disapprove [V]

Bondo, the above mentioned page does talk about the whitley in FAA service and gives the aircraft mark and service unit number.  They were indeed used mostly for training.

 

Dave

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Monday, January 19, 2009 4:03 PM
 razordws wrote:

Aaron, you should check out this site http://www.fleetairarmarchive.net/Aircraft/Aircraftindex.htm but I'm afraid that they do not mention the Catalina in FAA service at all.  You should also note that Canada also manufactured catalina's under the name of "Canso".  Most served with costal command but I did read one account of an RCAF pilot flying catalina's out of Ceylon but didn't give the unit he was flying with.  I know, I'm not much help. Disapprove [V]

Bondo, the above mentioned page does talk about the whitley in FAA service and gives the aircraft mark and service unit number.  They were indeed used mostly for training.

 

Thanks, that's a good one. Could be the Catalinas are post 1945.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: A secret workshop somewhere in England
Posted by TANGO 1 on Monday, January 19, 2009 6:31 PM
 sfcmac wrote:

 Looking good Sean! You have been going to town!  Got a production line a going!

 Perhaps The CAG! Himself may know the answer to the PBY mystery? 

My question was did the PBY Catalina serve with the FAA or was it souly RAF and Coastal Command?  Sir Bondo has found a link that shows it and some others I had not suspected as being used by the FAA. I can find to photos to substanciate this claim however and ask your wise counsel on this matter.

Hey if it's British? Ask an Englishman right?

Aaron,

the PBY was operated by the RAF. Although the Austrailian and New Zealand Fleet Air Arms used them the Royal Navy never actualy had them in their inventory.

This should help...........

Like many American military aircraft of the period the Consolidated Catalina actually gained its first combat experience in British hands. The Air Ministry purchased a single example of the PBY-4 (as the commercial Model 28-5) in 1939, and in July 1939 the aircraft flew across the Atlantic to the Marine Aircraft Experimental Establishment at Felixstowe, Suffolk to undergo tests. Even though these tests were cut short by the outbreak of the Second World War, the RAF still decided to place an order for the Catalina. The first of around 700 Catalinas to enter RAF service arrived early in 1941, and entered service with Nos.209 and 240 Squadrons of Coastal Command.

Sources differ on who was responsible for the use of the name Catalina, with both the RAF and Consolidated being given the credit. Catalina Island is off the coast of California, close to Los Angeles, and not too distant from Consolidated at San Diego. The RAF did prefer to give American aircraft names that reflected their country of origin, while Consolidated also named their aircraft. In either case the RAF knew the aircraft as the Catalina from 1939, while the US Navy did not adopt the name until 1 October 1941, when the vast majority of existing types of service aircraft were given names.

Coastal Command in Home Waters

The Catalina first saw active war service with RAF Coastal Command, before the United States entered the Second World War, but it was never present in British waters in large numbers. Seven squadrons operated the Catalina from Britain and two briefly from Iceland, giving the often quoted total of nine Coastal Command squadrons. However of these squadrons six used the Catalina with Coastal Command for less than a year, and only No.210 Squadron retained the Catalina in British from its introduction in 1941 until the end of the war. At no point were there more than three squadrons operating the Catalina from Britain.

Despite this limited level of use, the Catalina squadrons did produce some noteworthy achievements with Coastal Command. On 26 May 1941 it was a Catalina from No.209 Squadron that located the Bismarck, after the Navy lost radar contact with the German battleship, and Catalinas of No.240 Squadron shadowed her until surface ships regained contact. This was a rare example of the Catalina acting as the “eyes of the fleet” for the Royal Navy, a role that was normally performed by land based aircraft. Towards the end of the war, on 7 May 1945, a Catalina of No.210 squadron sank the 196th and last U-boat claimed by Coastal Command.

India and the Far East

 
Consolidated Catalina coming in to land, Sri Lanka
The Catalina was far more important on overseas stations, where its ability to operate from any suitable stretch of water was much more important than in Britain. Nine squadrons would operate the Catalina from bases in India and Sri Lanka, flying anti-submarine patrols, convoy escort and air sea rescue missions over the Indian Ocean, as well as dropping agents on the coasts of occupied Burma and Malaya.

No.205 Squadron was equipped with the Catalina early in 1941, and at the time of the Japanese attack was operating from Singapore and Sri Lanka. The squadron was then sucked into the fighting in the Dutch East Indies, suffering heavy losses before eventually reaching Australia in March 1942 with only two aircraft remaining. The squadron was then moved back to India to reform, and spent the rest of the war involved in the same routine as the newer Catalina squadrons.

Africa

Six Catalina squadrons operated from bases around the coast of Africa, four in East Africa and two in West Africa. These squadrons performed the same mix of anti-submarine, convoy escort and air-sea rescue missions as the Indian based squadrons, but in an area where there was relatively little enemy activity. As a result the routine for the crews in these squadrons was one of long periods of dull routine patrols over vast expanses of empty ocean, interrupted with sudden bursts of activity.

Variants 

Catalina I

The designation Catalina I was given to 100 PBY-5s purchased directly by the RAF. The Catalina I was given British equipment, including six Vickers machine guns – one in the nose, one in the rear tunnel and a twin gun on a manual mounting in each of the blister windows.

Catalina IA

The Catalina IA was the RAF designation for fourteen Model 28-5 AMCs produced in November-December 1941 for the RCAF.

Catalina IB

The Catalina IB was the designation given to 225 aircraft built by Consolidated as the PBY-5B. Of these aircraft 60 were retained by the US Navy, leaving 165 for the RAF. The change of designation from Catalina I or PBY-5 was probably due to the start of lend-lease –the Catalina Is purchased directly by the RAF had not needed a US Navy designation, but all lend-lease equipment had to have an official American designation

Catalina II

The designation Catalina II was given to 7 PBY-5s purchased directly by the RAF. They carried slightly different equipment to the Catalina I, although of three squadrons to operate the Catalina II only one did not use it alongside the Mk.I.

Catalina IIA

The designation Catalina IIA was given to 36 PBV-1s built by Canadian Vickers, and identical to the PBY-5.

Catalina IIIA

The designation Catalina IIIA was given to eleven PBY-5As, the only examples of the Amphibian version of the Catalina to enter RAF service. They came from a batch of PBY-5As delivered between December 1941 and March 1942, and spent most of their RAF career operating as part of a trans-Atlantic ferry service.

Catalina IVA

The designation Catalina IVA was given to 97 PBY-5s.

Catalina IVB

The designation Catalina IVB was given to 194 (193 in some sources) Boeing of Canada PB2B-1 Catalinas purchased by the RAF. The PB2B-1 was identical to the PBY-5. Boeing actually built 240 examples of this aircraft between July 1943 and October 1944, of which 34 went to New Zealand, 7 to Australia and 5 to the US Navy.

Catalina V

The designation Catalina V was reserved for the PBN-1 Nomad, but none of that aircraft entered RAF service, and so the designation was never used.

Catalina VI

The Catalina VI was the RAF designation for the Boeing of Canada produced PB2B-2, which was effectively a PBY-6A but without the landing gear.

Sources differ on the number of Catalina VIs produced, ranging between 59 and 67, with the biggest part of the difference being accounted for by disagreement on one block of serial numbers. All sources agree that 47 of these aircraft were used by the RAAF.

Regards, Darren. C.A.G. FAA/USNFAW GB
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.