Another 1/96 USS Constitution - third time's a charm (I hope)

Jose, tks for re-posting the pics. I am currently building one too.  I have detailed the gun deck cannons a bit, but not to the levels you are.  I am planning on doing more on the main deck guns. Your right about the hours involved in just getting all those little cannons done. I used the cannons from the kit and there is lots of trimming to be done.  I am in process of putting the gun deck in now.   Happy Holidays      Dale

very nice jose , keep it coming . hope you had a great x-mas

steve5

Thanks Bill, and Merry Christmas to you and yours!  

Jose,

Merry Christmas!  It's great to see you back!  Great work so far.

Bill

Hello all, 

2 months since my promise to post more pictures; work and family life have kept me busy. Here is the current state of the model._DSD1929 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

30 guns have been mounted, and tackles rigged one one each side. I'm working on adding coils to each side.

_DSD1928 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

Ringbolts have been added to the gun deck for rigging tackles for retracting the guns.

_DSD1927 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

Stanchions were added from the BlueJacket kit.  They had to be shortened because they were too ttall for the space between the Revell spar deck and gun deck, especially since I added deck planking to the gun deck, raising the height of the deck by 1/32 inch. I will also  be lowering the spar deck as described by the late Professor Tilley in the following post in order to give room to plank the spar deck:

http://cs.finescale.com/fsm/modeling_subjects/f/7/p/53334/982517.aspx#982517

I will be following a lot of his suggestions, and will include links to the relevant forum threads when I can find them.

I am also facing a couple of decisions before starting on the spar deck. One, should I add a detailed captain's cabin replete with furniture and sleeping quarters, or leave the gun deck cleared for action? two, how much detail should I add to the manger area, since it will be nearlh invisible anyway.

I plan to add anchor cables, wrap them around the anchor bitts and drop them down the main hatch. The drops will be  visible down past the pseudo berth deck, to the invisible cable tiers in the orlop area. I don't plan to add the messenger cable round the capstan, but I may change my mind on that - stay tuned!

Cheers!

Jose

Hello all,

I decided to rebuild this build log with my photos formerly drawn from photobucket re-drawn from Flickr. Currently I have mounted all 30 guns on the gun deck, and am halfwayh through rigging the tackles. I'll post pix soon.

Jose

Hello all,

I haven't worked much on my model for a month, since my youngest son, who is a junior in high school, is in the marching band, and there have been lots of performances on the weeken and practices on the weekdays. The marching band season just ended, so I am ready to start up again.

Installing guns is slow work. After painting the carriages and wheels, and blackening the britannia metal cannon barrels, and drilling  7 holes into the carriage and mounting eybolts, ringbolts and rings, I had to mount the carriage to the deck, secure the carriage by drilling a hole through the quoin on the carriage down partway through the gun deck, threading a brass rod through the two holes and seciring with CA. I then mounted the barrel and rigged the breech rope. I am up to 11 guns mounted out of 30 on the gun deck, and I still have to decide how many of the guns I'm going to mount the gun tackles on. _DSC8140 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

Note that I've covered up the opened main hatch to prevent things from falling through to my pseudo-berth deck.

On the stern, I mounted several eyebolts under the windows, and a pair on the rudder, in preparation for the rudder retention chains/cables. I'm trying to decide how to depict these, as I've seen several different representations on several differnt resources. I also added port covers for the cargo loading ports on the berth deck at the stern. I did not actually drill ports through the hull. I simply took some unused plastic gunport covers from the Revell kit and sanded them until ultra thin, then simply cemented them in place on the stern._DSC8638 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

One more shot of the current state of the model. Note the red window muntins across the stern and quarter galleries, a la Miguel Felice Corne's paintings, with a white gun stripe, ala the Isaac Hull Model at the Peabody Essex museum._DSC8640 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

James Deschain 1/96&1/25

happen to know the exact proper number or round about of how many crew we're on deck during beat to quarters do you?

Probably 7 per 24pdr; 7 on the 18pdr chase gun; 5 per truck croonade; and 3 per pivot carronade.  With typically, only one side manned.  There will be something between 20 and 30 to man the sails, who will aslo be on standby to repel boarders.  There will be powder monkey, 1 per 4 guns (I think), then a party of mates & stewards and the like to bring shot to the racks.  The Captain would be on the quarterdeck, with the Sailing Master/Quartermaster; the XO will be right forfard, the three Lieutenants each at a group of guns, with the Ensigns distributed about (and one each at the mast tops).

If it's only a drill, the officers (and petty officers/masters) would likely be prowling the ship's centerline watching the crew at their stations.  They'd be in working uniform, too.  Further, there'd be lookouts at the topgallants, too.

If a formal combat situation, the officers would have put on "proper" uniforms with lace, braid, and buttons.

Jose,

I do not understand how I have missed this thread!  I am deeply impressed by your work, although I am confused by your use of the word "wimpy" when comparing the Revell version of the 24 pounderers with the shorter ones from Bluejacket. They looked fine in your comparison photos; I would probably have gone with them for the greater accuracy.

I am also being somewhat reeducated about the Revell kit.  I had once read that she resembled the ship after her 1924 refit and not in her 1812 configuration, and I have labored under that thought for decades.  I am learning from you, Force9, and John Tilley that the opposite might be more true.  I might have to tackle this kit once more (the last was when I was 13 in 1967.

I do have several of these kits in my collection, also collecting them from garage sales and such, including that "Museum Classics" version.  It's interesting to contrast the old pre-painted copper from the 1960s version against the "Museum" version. Revell had used a very bright copper for the older kits, and a "weathered" version with the latter.  And, I agree about those so-called "cloth-like" sails. They are junk.

I have to agree with John about the vacuformed sails.  I never thought that they looked right on a completed model. I also try to make my own furled sails, although there is a source for pre-made cloth sails, flags, and pennants that are quite nice. This source is HisModel out of Czechoslovakia. They do have a set for the Revell kit.

Again, great job so far!

Bill Morrison

Very nice. it's all coming together. You can set up your cables and messengers. Maybe a pigsty up front too.

3 weeks have passed quickly since my last post. I worked almost every night, between 15 minutes and 2 hours a night, and seem to have relatively little to show for it so far. 

Lower deadeyes are finally all mounted. They took much longer than I wanted to, for the previously mentioned reasons. The mizzen deadeyes were a size smaller than the fore and mainmast deadeyes, so their strops tended to snap even more easily, as I was trying to wrap the strops around a much smaller circumference. 

_DSC8142 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I added crank handles to the chain pumps. I may re-do them but I am not sure if the effort is worth it, since these will be barely visible through the main hatch and perhaps the gunports. 

I added a few strips of wood to the captain's cabin, specifically the window sill bench across the rear part of the cabin, and some square dowels to represent the stern timbers. They are slightly visible through the stern windows.

_DSC8146 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I started mounting the ship's guns. After rigging the breeching ropes, I realized that the guns were not secured to the deck in any way, so I drilled some very small holes into the deck and inserted short brass rods through an eyebolt on each side of the carriage, and secured the ends of the rods to the holes in the deck with CA. This will be okay for the guns that are hardly visible, but not how I want to secure the guns that will be near the main hatch. For those more visible guns, I will probably drill holes through the carriages themselves, perhaps through the quoins, to hide the brass rod pinning the guns to the deck. My last Constitution build did not have the guns secured to the deck with anything other than plastic cement, and a handful of them broke loose. Fortunately, I had wrapped the breeching ropes around the cascabels of the barrels and cemented them, so they stayed in place to some extent. I learned my lesson then - I must secure the guns to the deck with more than glue; some sort of pin or brass rod to pin them down to the deck.

The chainplates (flat iron pieces tacked through the last chain onto the hull to support the deadeye/chain assemblies) are molded onto the Revell plastic hull. The Bluejacket kit comes with chainplates, so I could have filed down the molded chainplates, but I chose to keep them. I drilled a hole into the hull just above each chainplate, then I took short pieces of wire, bent them, looped them through the chain loop attached to the stopped deadeyes and inserted the ends into the hole, to complete the stropped deadeye/chain/chainplate assemblies.

The Channels

The Bluejacket kit comes with a strip of wood specifically intended to be used to form the channels. I was planning to create 2 sets of channels, one from the wood from the Bluejacket kit, and one made from the plastic parts of the Revell kit, and then go with whichever one I liked better. I used the plastic channel as a template for the wooden one. Upon carving the basswood, I found a few things. 1. Wood is a lot harder to carve than plastic. 2. wood is a lot harder to carve than plastic. I got the feeling that no matter how much I carved the wood, it would be hard to get the inside surface of the channel to match as perfectly as the plastic one already does. I was planning on inserting brass rod into the wood, drilling matching holes through the hull, and attaching the channels, but in the end, I decided that no matter how well I carved the wood channels, the join between them and the hull would not be as strong as the original plastic melded to the hull with plastic solvent cement, so I chose to work with the Revell channels.

I took the existing chains underneath the Revell channels and using them as a guide, I carved in some rectangular notches with a needle file, where the deadeye strops would eventually go, then snipped off the chains and filed the nubs down.

_DSC8075 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

Originally, I tried CA gluing the strops into the notches, planning later to glue a styrene strip on the outside edge of the channel to lock the strops in, but the CA did not hold the strops in well at all, and any pressure I placed on the strops disconnected them (the tube of CA possibly was old, and may have lost its holding power). I switched tactics, gluing the styrene strip on the edge before adding the stropped deadeyes. I also added a strip to fill in the recessed area where the Revell deadeye assembly would normally have been glued atop the channel.

_DSC8078 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I then inserted the stropped deadeyes, added the chain link to the stem/loop below, and soldered the link shut. A couple of eyebolts were added for the Bentink shrouds and topsail halyards. All this was done before the channel was attached to the hull.

Note that for the fore and main masts, the deadeyes for the shrouds are 5/32 inch dia, while the deadeyes for the backstays are 1/8 inch dia.

I've installed the fore channels with the stropped deadeyes and chains._DSC8072 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I apologize in advance for the wordy descriptions following - you can skip it and just enjoy the pics.

Stropping the deadeyes

The lower deadeyes are 5/32 inch diameter. I tried to strop the deadeyes according to the link listed a few posts up, but did not follow it to the letter by a longshot. Mistake number one - instead of copper wire, I bought K&S 0.020 brass ROD. Yes, the differrence between rod and wire were not apparent to me. I clamped the rod to a 1/8 inch dia brass tubing_DSC8086 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr and wound the rod tightly around the tube, to form tight coils which I would then snip through to form rings. I discovered, however, that no matter how tightly I wound the rod around the tubing, upon releasing the end, the rod would spring outward and the coil was much larger in diameter than the 1/8 inch I intended. I plugged on, snipped through the coils_DSC8087 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

and soldered the rings closed._DSC8087 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I pinched the annealed spot between a 5/32 inch dia drill bit and a ruler with a rounded notch along the center, and pinched the ring around the drill bit._DSC8089 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

95% of the time, the solder joint snapped, and I had to re-solder the joints after pinching. The stiffness of the rings, the fact that I used cheap tin-based solder, and the softness of the ruler's wood were probably all contributing factors. 

After shaping the strop around the drill bit, I snapped the deadeyes into the strop, and pinched the stem of the strop as close to the deadeyes as I could, but for many, the strops again snapped at the solder joint. In the end I ended up repeating the process for all deadeyes, but switched to 0.016 brase WIRE, which I found to be much more malleable. Note that I added a bend in the strop - the chains below and the deadeyes above will be at opposite angles relative to the channels._DSC7869 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

That's awesome Jose, 

My casting and molding kit is, on it's way to my modeling table as we speak. 

So I'll, be cranking out little dudes shortly. You wouldn't happen to know the exact proper number or round about of how many crew we're on deck during beat to quarters do you? 

Hi James,

Thanks for the offer, but actually I have a bunch of crewmen from my two previous builds of the Constitution, along with a set of crewmen from the Cutty Sark in my stash, plus a handful of crew from the 1/96 Mayflower in my stash (probably won't be using the Pilgrim figures, though). So I actually have roughly 115 crew figures in 1/96 scale. Unfortunately, the Crewmen from the constitution are in similar poses, so if I choose to use them, I will need to find creative ways to make them look different. If I choose not to use them, they are yours. I am actually considering now a water diorama with the ship under sail, with as may of the crew as I can muster.

Best,

Jose

Jose, 

Awesome progress on ur model. The Blue jacket parts are pretty amazing. I still plan on sticking with the recall parts. Shaving and, sanding here I come :). 

A note for u since u seem, to, be the only other one making forward progress, on, this beast.  I, have been hunting for 1/96 figure for this models. Their are a lot of good alternatives out there however non that won't require a ton of prep/modifications to work. I plan on creating a mold of the 20 figures that are, provided, in the revell kit. They all have the right dress but,  most importantly,  they are 1/96. If you would like,  I would be more, than willing to make a second mold for your use as well. I'm keeping all plastic scrab from the build to make the figures. After that I will be using resin or styrene. I plan on having a minimum of 70 figures on Deck and maybe more, if I include a squad of Marines. No worries about me charging you.  It's free.  Gotta help out my fellow builder of this behemoth. Just let me know. 

Here's a link to some pics of my build as well. Not as crazy detail as yours cause I'm trying to stick to the original revell model. But maybe u will learn something. I've learned tons from you so far. 

http://s346.photobucket.com/user/mma200600/library/Mobile%20Uploads 

My thoughts are also with you, Prof Tilley, hope all goes well. 

I do love the BlueJacket fittings. Case in point - the deadeyes are classified into upper and lower. The difference? while for the lower deadeyes all the holes have grooves that point in the direction that the lanyard will be running, for the upper deadeyes, one of the holes does not have a groove on one side. Why? because a lanyard begins with a stopknot, then the lanyard goes through the first hole in the upper deadeye, then runs down to the first hole in the lower deadeye, then up again through the second hole of the upper deadeye, and so forth. That upper deadeye does not need a groove next to that first hole where the stop knot stops the lanyard. I've looked at other deadeyes provided by other companies, and they don't separate the deadeyes to upper and lower, and many don't even have the grooves etched in next to the holes. For me, the little details make the slightly higher price of the parts well worth the difference.

Thanks GM, but it looks like the hurricane (actually it's been downgraded to a tropical storm now) isn't going to hit us hard. The schools are sending the kids home two hours early today, and ECU night classes have been canceled. But (getting down to really important matters) it's been asserted that ECU's first football game will go on tomorrow as scheduled. The weathermen say the worst will be tonight, between 8:00 pm and 8:00 am. They're predicting between four and eight inches of rain, and winds up to 35 mph. By North Carolina hurricane standards that's a nuisance.

What is worrisome is the Weather Channel's projection that when the storm moves out to sea (somewhere around Norfolk) it may strengthen again, and possibly come back ashore. It's conceivable that another Sandy may be brewing.

Prof. Tilley,

My thoughts are with you- bring in those lawn chairs!

It was kind of Mr. Gonzales to mention that old thread. Unfortunately, since those days two of the products I mentioned have become unavailable: silkspan tissue and Poly-Scale paint.

The good news is that good substitutes can be had. Bluejacket Shipcrafters sells a material called "Modelspan" that, though I haven't actually tried it yet, certainly looks like it should work fine as a substitute for silkspan. Here's a link: http://www.bluejacketinc.com/fittings/fittings11.htm . Modelspan is about halfway down the page.

Incidentally, if you're serious about sailing ship modeling Bluejacket is a good firm to get acquainted with. Its britannia metal fittings are, in my opinion, the best in the business.

A Spanish paint company called Vallejo is working valiantly to meet the needs of modelers who liked the old Poly-Scale line. Vallejo colors can be found in lots of online retailers, and some local hobby shops. (The HobbyLobby store here in the teeming metropolis of Greenville, NC has a Vallejo rack.) Some of the old railroad-oriented colors that I like for ship purposes (including my favorite color for furled sails, "aged concrete," are being made by Vallejo and marketed by Microlux (the small tool folks). Here's a link: http://www.micromark.com/microlux-flat-acrylic-paint-for-brush-application-aged-concrete-2-ounces,12449.html .

Hope that helps a little. Mr. Gonzales is right: for what little it's worth, I just can't live with vac-formed plastic sails.

This is my First 1/96 and i want to do it right. i read through mister Tilleys posts and i believe im going to go with furled as well. i also did not know that when furled, the yards are lowered not raised. that is definitly worth knowing. thanks for the help Jose and yes i bleieve i will start a build blog shortly. the biggest mistake on my model to date is the seams are still visible on the main deck because i decided not to use balsa for planking. i wanted to stick to the original plastic decking. howver i was able to effectivly pull out the wood grain using a washing tecnique i learned a long time ago. but im going to put posed scenes and equipment on the seams to hide them instead of trying to redo the deck. thanks for the help.

Hello James,

I'm not a hater of the original vacu-formed sails, just the fuzzy coated ones from the Museum Classics version of the kit. My last completed constitution has the non-coated plastic ones. I built the kit mostly out of the box, but I bought rigging lines of a wide variety of diameters and tied my own shrouds and ratlines. If I had to do it again, I'd probably ditch the plastic and use tissue to try to recreate the fully deployed sails. Here are pix of my previous USS Constitution, finished a couple of years ago:

_DSC4949 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC4966 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC4969 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

This time around I plan to put furled sails following the method of our professor emeritus, John Tilley. He provides an excellent detailed description in the following thread:

http://cs.finescale.com/fsm/modeling_subjects/f/7/t/33775.aspx?sort=ASC&pi240=1

I may still change my mind and try the tissue with fully deployed or partially deployed sails.

There are a ton of helpful posts and build logs on this site, from some much more experienced and better modellers than myself. I'll post links to some of the most helpful ones as I go along in my build. Please post a build log if you feel up to it, we would all enjoy it and are happy to help.

Hi Jose,

sorry for the long post but im also currently building the 1/96 USS C.

Just got done reading your entire blog on the 1/96 Constitution. some pretty awsome information. i have currrently continued work on my own Revell 1/96 USS C. (For all the plastic model haters, Ive been building revell models my whole life since i was 10 and love plastic models so please be kind to me.)

before i ask you my qestion, i just wanted to let you know i am not using parts from any other model kit because i want to maintain the integrity of the original Revell Kit. revell is really good at getting me new missing and broken parts so there is another source for you. MOST parts i have asked for they have supplied free of charge. this included updated planes for rigging and assembly. way better and more detailed that the original ones included in the kit. yes its a little harder to work with just the kit provided but the part trees provide a lot of scrap so no worries. plus, im a huge fan of Revell and like to stick to their provided parts as much as possible.

my question is this. i noticed you metioned the orginal revell plastic formed sails were really bad. i believe u said "good riddance" and i aggree. this is the only thing i am willing to switch out.  but my dilemma is this. What do i use in place of them for Sails? this is new territory for me. all my other ships i have assembled i have used the sails provided. do you have any suggestions? i have been looking at different fabrics but im worried about the scale of the weave matching the ship.

very nice jgonzarles , I had the same trouble on my stern , no dremel just a file , my painting's not' as good as your's though

steve5

_DSC7843 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I attached the stern to the hull a couple of weeks ago, but have not taken pictures of the hull since then yet. Here's a shot of the stern before attaching. I've built this model twice before, and both times, the stern attachment has been a major headache, because the back end of the gun deck has always interfered with the fit of the stern to the hull. The corner formed by the end of the gun deck itself and the vertical rise of what ends up being the horizontal shelf across the back of the ship in the captain's cabin juts out just too far, and so either the bottom of the stern will not lie flush with the hull, or the upper part of the stern will not align with the back part of the galleys on either side.  This time around, I was armed with a dremel, which I did not have on the previous attempts at building this ship, so after a LOT of grinding, in which I thinned that corner almost to the point of making it translucent, I was able to attach the stern piece to the hull flush.

Coming up - my trials and tribulations with the chainplates and deadeyes

Hi all,

I've been working on stropping the lower deadeys in preparation for mounting the channels, and it's been quite hard. I found some instruction on the forums at Modelshipworld.com, that I think will be very useful, will try out their suggestions. Here is the page:

http://modelshipworld.com/index.php/topic/7625-manufacturing-of-deadeye-strops/ 

Best,

Jose

Hello all,

Here are the promised pictures of the assembled hull halves and gun deck.

_DSC7838 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC7839 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC7840 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC7841 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC7842 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

I was encouraged by the success of the suspended berth deck below, and was considering building up the spar deck from the wood dowels and deck plank sheets, but when I lined up the Revell plastic spar deck pieces on the deck plan sheet from the BlueJacket kit, I found some discrepancies.

_DSC7844 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

First, note that the main hatch on the Bluejacket plans is smaller than the Revell deck's hatch. The deck beam locations seem to line up fairly well. But the biggest discrepancy is the locations of the fore and main masts. The foremast on the Bluejacket plans is stepped farther back, and the mainmast is farther forward

_DSC7846 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

_DSC7845 by Jose Gonzales, on Flickr

The mizzen mast lines up fairly closely. Since I had already mounted the wood-planked plastic gun deck, I could not use these plans to generate a wooden spar deck to match the gun deck. 

I searched for an explanation for the discrepancy, and found one - in the book "Old Ironsides: The Rise, Decline, and Resurrection of the USS Constitution" by Thomas Gillmer, illustrations by William Gilkerson, 1993, paperback (first printing 1997). On pg 160, Chapter 5 "The Restoration Question", Gillmer describes the changes in the structure of the ship over the last ~200+ years: "One of the most striking diversions from the original design is in the location of the masts. The formast step has been moved aft about 2 feet 4 inches. At the deck it is 3 feet 2 inches farther aft, showing an increased rake aft of more than 2 1/2 degrees; this results in a total aftward change of approximately 5 1/2 feet to the mast's fore top. the mainmast, to the contrary, has been moved forward and closer to the foremast, with the mast-step center moved about 2 feet 3 inches forward on the keelson..." In short, the mizzen mast is relatively unchanged from launch, but the foremast has been moved back, and the main mast has been moved forward since launch. If this is true, the Bluejacket plans represent the ship post mast step movement, while the Revell kit has the masts in their original location. If you have the book, there is also a drawing on pg 156 of the same chapter which overlays a draft of the current lines of the ship on top of an as-built drawing - this drawing  alone is worthy of a separate discussion. The question is, when did the mast-step changes take place, before, during, or after the glory years of the War of 1812? Unfortunately, the book does not answer that question.

Hi all,

I've assembled the gun deck to the hull halves - pix upcoming - but I wanted to share some musing about the guns and my plans to rig them. 

So for a fully rigged gun, there are 5 tackles: 2 side tackles, 2 gun tackles and 1 training tackle. For each tackle, there would be 1 single and 1 double block. For each block there would be 1 hook. So, for 24 fully rigged spar deck carronades, there would be a total of 120 tackles, 120 single blocks, 120 double blocks, 240 hooks. For 30 gun deck guns, that would be 150 tackles, 150 single blocks, 150 double blocks, 300 hooks.

My original ambition was to fully rig all guns...