A little quick terminology (without intending to insult anybody's intelligence). The rigging of a sailing ship is divided into two general categories: standing rigging and running rigging. Standing rigging "stands;" it's set up more-or-less permanently. It keeps the masts from falling down, and transmits the force of the wind from the sails and yards to the ship's hull, pulling the ship through the water. Running rigging "runs." It hauls the yards, gaffs, booms, and other spars, and the sails, around to accommodate the wind and the captain's intentions. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries all rope supplied to the British Royal Navy was, by law, soaked in something called Stockholm tar. I've never seen Stockholm tar, but I'm reliably informed that it's a rich, medium brown in color. That's what the running rigging probably looked like. Most of the standing rigging, in addition to the original soaking, was coated after it was in place with a concoction containing tar and lampblack, which, if it wasn't pure black must have been close. That's why modelers often use black thread for standing rigging. There's room for some disagreement about the color of ratlines (which, strictly speaking, are the horizontal ropes running across the shrouds - the vertical ropes). The one and only purpose of the ratlines is to serve as a ladder for men climbing the masts. It's been noted that treating the ratlines along with the standing rigging would tend to make them slippery. Some modelers assert, rather emphatically, that "ratlines were never tarred." The evidence of old master marine paintings and more modern photographs doesn't seem to support that. (The "blackening" on the shrouds had to be renewed periodically. It would be difficult to blacken the shrouds without hitting the ratlines - unless the ratlines were systematically removed, which seems unlikely.) The H.M.S. Victory website offers a page for modelers (http://www.hms-victory.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=78&Itemid=111). It describes the ratlines as "natural hemp with a very light tarring." That makes sense to me - but there's plenty of room for disagreement as to just what it looked like. (That website, by the way, is a good place for any Victory enthusiast to spend some time. But take the photos with a grain of salt. She's rigged with modern synthetic rope, and the people responsible for maintaining her have been forced into lots of compromises with historical accuracy due to problems of funding and practicality.) Hope that helps a little. Good luck. |