SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Vietnam Huey

255807 views
530 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:03 PM

Howie

This subject has popped up a few times in the huey threads and has been cause for much debate. Its interesting, as new pictures throw up new questions it tends to fuel the fires of those in the know and for some reason brings forth knowledge of all things "official"  

Gino's right, The only "official" gunships were the B and C models and later the cobras, The D and H models only "official" use, was for troop and cargo transport. But like Gino said, some units begged, borrowed, swapped and stole parts from other units or downed helicopters and "unofficially" added bits and bobs to there aircraft.

Ive done a fare bit of research into nighthawk/firefly helos lately and its true that many units adapted one of the slicks for night fighting with spare parts and weapons for base protection but there was also an "official" role for the helicopter.

They were used to annoy the enemy and induce sleep deprivation. They would continually fly in circles over suspected enemy locations at night with searchlight on in the hopes that the noise and light would deprive the enemy of sleep or flush them out (similar to the daytime role of the loach) and as with the loach the nighthawk would also be supported by one or two UH-1C or Cobra gunships flying at higher altitude. If anything kicked off the nighthawk would guide the gunships in to sort it out.

Allthough many were armed to the teeth with either twin M60's, miniguns and 50 cals, they were only door mounted weapons and usualy only mounted on one side (as their role was to circle locations). They do not really qualify as "gunships" in the "official" sense of the word as that would mean that all the slicks with door mounted M60's could also be called gunships, and thats just silly. Basicly the nighthawk was the night time version of the loach, a scout ship, Both the loach and the nighthawk were armed with a minigun for protection but their primary role was to spot targets for the "Official" Gunships.

(Unofficial Nighthawk with minigun)

(Unofficial Nighthawk with 50 cal)

Apart from early initial UH-1D armament trials and a few Individual unit based hybrid D&H models built with external mounted armaments in the field, there were no official US Army D or H Gunships serving in Vietnam.

(Unofficial Hybrid quad 60 armed UH-1D)

(Early test model UH-1D armed with quad 60s)

We tend to keep getting hung up on the terms "Official" and "Gunship" and it seems to cause alot of confusion but in most part thats due to the Armys "official" role of a gunship. As Gino said anything that has a fixed forward firing externaly mounted weapons platform is usually deemed as a gunship (desperatly trying to forget that the loach had a fixed forward firing minigun so as not to confuse myself or undermine my own pointWhistling [:-^] lol)

Another thing to bare in mind is when US troops called in helicopters for gunship support only Bs,Cs and cobras would turn up (Aussies had H model gunships for support but thats a whole other story) and as far as i know most helicopter units were split into two sections, Slicks and Guns. The "Slicks" section was comprised of the larger troop carrying Ds or Hs and the "Guns" section was made up of the armed smaller B or C models. Also the name of the helicopter is a big clue as to its "official" role but can also lead to confusion, AH-1 = Attack helicopter, UH-1 = Utility helicopter, but then the Utility helicopters A,B and C were used as attack helicopters so that helps lol. 

I think for modelling purposes whether something was "official" or not, how common it was or wasnt is pretty irrelevant, in my opinion if it existed, then its fair game. (C ration cans used On door mounted M60D's were not used officialy but for some reason do not bring the same "Its not official" response when mentioned in posts, that armed slicks do lol). I dont think its ever been said on here that "D or H model hueys only flew with standard M60s on each door "? But on the flip side i dont recall anyone ever actually asking or stating if or that the US army used these armed UH-1H/Ds as "gunships" in any "official" or "regular" way! If its a heavily armed UH-1H or D just be aware that these were not deemed officialy as gunships and you will be promtly informed so by the guys on here.

But heavily armed slicks did exist nomatter what anyone says. Part of what qualifys a gunship as a gunship is its use as support for troops on the ground for which the nighthawk/firefly was used on many occasion on bases coming under attack at night. Im sure the guys inside the wire watching the minigun tracers saving their bacon, regarded the nighthawk as much a gunship as they did the huey hogs and cobras and C-130 spookys, anything that can rain down minigun fire on an advancing enemy couldnt be anything less than a gunship, but in the nighthawks case it wasnt "Official".

The picture below is an "Unofficial" Heavily armed UH-1D, Its not a Nighthawk or an "official" gunship but its armed with two door mounted M134 miniguns, (one less than a C-130 gunship!) a 50 cal machine gun and a flare dispenser so official or unofficial, uncommon or not, you cant escape the fact that its a ship with lots of guns!! Call it what you want (but do it "unofficialy" lol Wink [;)])

P.S this has to be said! 

Im fully aware that as usual some of my comments will no doubt be ignored, resented or critisized by those that for whatever reason dont like my posts, or feel and think they know better and thats fine Smile [:)] I couldnt care less, i am more than willing and gratefull to learn new things from the guys on here with first hand experience who have been so open and helpful, but one thing i cant bare is closed ranks or closed minds, Its a great site and i only post to get people talking, to help keep the forum flowing and for the benefit of people like me that are interested in making various huey models (Official or Unofficial) and havnt reached the point yet where they think they know it all, or possess the rights to all huey knowledge lol, of those people i have neither the time or the patience. Its an internet modelling forum for all and not an elite members club Big Smile [:D] lol 

I never served in Vietnam but God knows i have spent enough years researching the subject to know a little of what im talking about.

Moan over lol  Big Smile [:D]  

Andy

 

 

 

While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: phoenix
Posted by grandadjohn on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:01 PM
 HeavyArty wrote:

As we stated in the other threads, the Nighthawks with .50 cals and/or miniguns and the spotlight were not a standard set-up and not considered a gunship.  A gunship was a dedicated platform with fixed, forward firing weapons and was used for fire support to ground troops.  The Nighthawks and Fireflies were not true gunships.  Also, most were cobbled together from spare parts, extra MGs, and extra airframes.  Their main role was base defense as well, not ground support. 

There were all sorts of one-off helos out there that were not used in standard configurations.  I still contend that there were no official D and H model gunships used by the US Army.  

 

I have to agree with Gino

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Valrico, FL
Posted by HeavyArty on Monday, May 21, 2007 10:57 PM

As we stated in the other threads, the Nighthawks with .50 cals and/or miniguns and the spotlight were not a standard set-up and not considered a gunship.  A gunship was a dedicated platform with fixed, forward firing weapons and was used for fire support to ground troops.  The Nighthawks and Fireflies were not true gunships.  Also, most were cobbled together from spare parts, extra MGs, and extra airframes.  Their main role was base defense as well, not ground support. 

There were all sorts of one-off helos out there that were not used in standard configurations.  I still contend that there were no official D and H model gunships used by the US Army.  

Gino P. Quintiliani - Field Artillery - The KING of BATTLE!!!

Check out my Gallery: https://app.photobucket.com/u/HeavyArty

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Long Island, NY USA
Posted by Howie Belkin on Monday, May 21, 2007 10:07 PM

Hello Gents,

I've been off for a while.  I've recently been in touch with some alumni from my unit, C/227 AHB, 1st Air Cav and have once again been reminded why I say 'never say never.'  In our thread it's been said that no US model D or Hs flew as gunships, with anything more than the standard M-60 on ea side.  Turns out thru 1971 (not sure if/when we stopped flying it) my company had an H with a .50 on the D.G.'s stbd/right side and a nighthawk minigun, spotlight and starlight night scope on the C.E.'s port/left side.  It WAS an 'H' model.

Pres. Nixon had been unilaterally withdrawing whole units from Nam (thinking the 'bad guys' used the same rules and would do likewise) so less and less Americans had to secure more and more area and I guess they wanted as much punch as they could get.  Heck, there were times I wished I had a lot more than just my M-60!

Howie

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: phoenix
Posted by grandadjohn on Monday, May 21, 2007 9:12 AM

Unusual Vietnam Huey thread

 

/forums/767176/ShowPost.aspx

 

Some of you newer readers may want to check it out

  • Member since
    November 2003
Posted by c3po on Sunday, May 20, 2007 9:06 PM
Thanks for the links Andy. It looks to be pretty good.

Unfortunately, I live in the forced dial-up world. (grass grows faster) Is this a new broadcast show, or an old one? If it is an old one, might they have it on dvd now?
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Saturday, May 19, 2007 5:13 PM

I hav'nt added anything to this thread in a while as its getting a bit big, but i came across this video and thought that the huey fans in this forum would appreciate it as much as i did.

For those that havnt seen it before its the discovery channel documentary on the UH-1 Helicopter in Vietnam, with comments from Hal Moore, Bruce Crandall, Joe Galloway, pilots,crew chiefs, gunners and 7th cav troops, With Original clips of LZ X-ray and Albany it has some of the best footage you are ever likely to see.

1  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WbRSQzU8_I

2  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DSVIzxIqSU

3  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqGgz7Kun7Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-Ag4Nmcb80

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G--EWskeaYw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avmKKThn9fg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FAkUJlsWz4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyd3k2C7pTs

Andy

 

While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Brisbane, Australia
Posted by shaun68 on Thursday, May 3, 2007 3:57 AM
 richgb wrote:

Skidd,

"In fact our H model gunships were only retired last year.  Retired as gunships that is... they are still flying and armed just awaiting the 'official' paperwork to happen before they are parked up."

That's amazing and just goes to show the incredible reliability of this aircraft.

Rich

That & the dedication of our RAAF & AAAvn 'erks' Rich. You've only got to have a look at our F-111's - they're in better looking shape now in their dreary old FS 36118, than when we got them 30 odd years ago in SEA Camo

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Southport, North West UK
Posted by richgb on Wednesday, May 2, 2007 12:21 PM

Skidd,

"In fact our H model gunships were only retired last year.  Retired as gunships that is... they are still flying and armed just awaiting the 'official' paperwork to happen before they are parked up."

That's amazing and just goes to show the incredible reliability of this aircraft.

Rich

...this is it folks...over the top!
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Melbourne, Australia
Posted by Skidd on Tuesday, May 1, 2007 3:34 PM
 richgb wrote:

Hi Skidd,

Cheers for that.

Rich

No worries... many of the Aussie Hueys are still around in one form or another.  In fact our H model gunships were only retired last year.  Retired as gunships that is... they are still flying and armed just awaiting the 'official' paperwork to happen before they are parked up.

Andrew Melbourne, Australia I love anything huey!
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Southport, North West UK
Posted by richgb on Tuesday, May 1, 2007 8:41 AM

Hi Skidd,

Cheers for that.

Rich

...this is it folks...over the top!
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Melbourne, Australia
Posted by Skidd on Monday, April 30, 2007 11:16 PM
 richgb wrote:

I don't suppose you have any serial numbers as there's an Aussie site where you can track down individual a/c. Maybe I'll be able to get more info about this.

Rich

 

Rich,

The heli shown in those pics is A2-1025.  Was sold back into the USA in the '80s and crashed in 1999.

Andrew Melbourne, Australia I love anything huey!
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Wednesday, April 18, 2007 5:09 AM

Hi Rich

This site has serial numbers and info of Aussie UH-1B/D/H's that were in Vietnam.

http://www.adf-serials.com/3a2.shtml

Andy

ps the "Ned Kelly" A2-1025 UH-1B is in there.

While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Southport, North West UK
Posted by richgb on Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:47 AM

Hi,

Thanks for those pics. That "Ned Kelly" looks really mean!! I wonder what the weight was? Looks heavy. Maybe that's why they armed the larger D/H models. I don't suppose you have any serial numbers as there's an Aussie site where you can track down individual a/c. Maybe I'll be able to get more info about this.

Rich

...this is it folks...over the top!
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Houston, Texas
Posted by empeter on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:31 PM
 richgb wrote:

Hi,

Did the Aussies ever arm B's and C's as gunships or was it only the D/H Bushrangers?

Rich

Yes, but it might have only been a trial.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Lafayette, LA
Posted by Melgyver on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:24 AM
 richgb wrote:

Hi,

Did the Aussies ever arm B's and C's as gunships or was it only the D/H Bushrangers?

Rich

Rich,

I've never seen any info to indicate the Aussie's had any "Bravo or Charlie" model Hueys.

Clear Left!

Mel

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Southport, North West UK
Posted by richgb on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:18 AM

Hi,

Did the Aussies ever arm B's and C's as gunships or was it only the D/H Bushrangers?

Rich

...this is it folks...over the top!
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Monday, April 16, 2007 4:23 PM

Hi all

If anyones interested i will be posting some pictures soon on the progress of my 1/32 huey, my mates lending me his cam Smile [:)].

My original intention was to attach the pilot doors so that they opened and closed so you could see the detail inside, but i have just noticed the terrible big clumpy hinges on the kit that allow you to do that. also in the picture of the huey i posted earlier i noticed the guy had put on some accurate hinges for the pilot doors.

Is there any way to put on realistic hinges and still be able to open and close the pilot doors without glueing them in the open or closed position?

Andy

 

 

 

 

While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Saturday, April 14, 2007 10:13 PM
lol thanks gino i ment is the detail better on one than the other or both the same?
While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Valrico, FL
Posted by HeavyArty on Saturday, April 14, 2007 10:10 PM
 skypirate1 wrote:

Hello chaps.

Just a quick question, is there any difference between the dragon helicopter crew kit M60's and mounts and the cobra company ones?

 

 

Nope, they are both M-23 mounts with M60Ds on them. 

Gino P. Quintiliani - Field Artillery - The KING of BATTLE!!!

Check out my Gallery: https://app.photobucket.com/u/HeavyArty

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Saturday, April 14, 2007 10:00 PM

Hello chaps.

Just a quick question, is there any difference between the dragon helicopter crew kit M60's and mounts and the cobra company ones?

 

While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Southport, North West UK
Posted by richgb on Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:18 PM

Andy,

I've always found the lead foil from Talisker single malt whisky is excellent. In fact I'm about to re-stock up on my foil soon!!! I think I've earned it after my lads being off for the Easter hols.

Rich

...this is it folks...over the top!
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 4:34 PM

Thanks guys.

A trip to my hobby shop tomorrow for some paints and to the wine merchant (Party [party] Hic) for some seatbelts.

Andy 

While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Hot Springs AR
Posted by SnakeDoctor on Monday, April 9, 2007 7:25 PM

The color of the soundproofing  blankets for UH-1 models was "Color Dark Gull Gray Per Federal Standard 595, Color #36231. The blankets were made to spec Mil-I-7171 Type 1, Fig 2.  The quilting pattern is on the same spec Fig 3.  2" by 6".

I did find the binding could be made from either cloth or top grain leather.

I would imagine that you could find slightly different hues. The Army has a program called breakout. They have all the Bell prints and can submit these to whomever they want to build the blanket for them. Many many parts were built for the Army from other sources than Bell, even though the Bell part number appears on them. In fact some of the parts carry the Bell inspectors stamp as the other vendors copied the part as they saw it. If you want the blanket color to be per the factory spec, that is above. Realistically I doubt if the military would reject blankets if they were at the extreme ends of the specs. This is not a critical flight part.

Hope this helps

Ed

 

"Whether you think you can or can't, your're right". Henry Ford
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Sunday, April 8, 2007 11:48 PM
Thank you Grandad i will go check out my hobby shop im pretty sure they do tamiya paints Thumbs Up [tup]
While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by skypirate1 on Sunday, April 8, 2007 11:42 PM
While the rest of the crew may be in the same predicament, it's almost always the pilot's job to arrive at the crash site first.
  • Member since
    April 2003
Posted by oscardeuce on Sunday, April 8, 2007 9:21 PM

I have the honor of flying 2 Viet Nam veteran aircraft. A UH-1H and a Cessna O2-A. Some interior pics are here. I just love the sound of the Huey, and can only imagine what is was like to fly one in combat.

 

www.huey.org

 

Wecome home to all you vets! Thank you!

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Long Island, NY USA
Posted by Howie Belkin on Sunday, April 8, 2007 9:04 PM

Andy

Huey interiors were painted FS36231 Dark Gull Gray, and the quilted fabric was pretty close to the same color.  The model photo you posted shows different shades of gray subject to the light hitting it - notice the vertical post and the floor.

The Sqn/Signal Books HUEY by Lou Drendel has excellent photos of the back of the pilots seat, and WALK AROUND UH-1 HUEY GUNSHIPS by Wayne Mutza has a less clear photo.

Someone asked a little earlier about the M-60 having the folded infantry bipod mounted. We flew with it on our guns, if for no better reason than if you went down you were to take the M-60 off its pintle mount and fight as infantry.  You could swing the bipod 'legs' down to steady the M-60 if you were firing,  lying prone.

Howie

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: phoenix
Posted by grandadjohn on Sunday, April 8, 2007 9:00 PM
When you are actually in the aircraft the padding is a metallic silver/gray. Best paint I have ever found to match it is Tamiya's XF-56 Metallic Grey
  • Member since
    April 2007
Posted by Bounce19712 on Sunday, April 8, 2007 8:24 PM
yes please, Skypirate give us the links to the guys slick site...
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.