SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Urban Armor GB, May 1-Dec 31, 2008

29417 views
262 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Friday, June 20, 2008 6:24 PM
Man, nice save! I've certainly never tried that technique before...how well does the wax hold it's shape? And does it paint easily?
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Bridgeview, Illinois
Posted by mg.mikael on Friday, June 20, 2008 6:32 PM

 dupes wrote:
Man, nice save! I've certainly never tried that technique before...how well does the wax hold it's shape? And does it paint easily?

The wax holds it shape quite well, but it depends on what type of wax you use. I tried making pieces with two types of wax. After waiting a few hours, one wax remained greasy and soft( but that was the type of wax). The other wax dried nicely and was quite hard after drying. Note: YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL in handling the piece of wax because it can crack easily, even after drying, if your to rough.

Painting is something I have yet to do. I heard acrylics don't hold well to wax. So in a day or so I'm going to practice painting pieces of wax with enamel paint. Hope it works or I'm screwed.Sigh [sigh]

I'll have an update on painting wax soon.

"A good plan executed now is better than a perfect plan next week." - George S. Patton

  Photobucket 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cheney, WA
Posted by FastasEF on Saturday, June 21, 2008 8:41 PM

Had to get away from the PE airplane for a little so I picked up an 1/72 Airfix SD.KFZ.234 and on the box it shows it driving through an African city as per the directions say it opperated in. Would I be able to join this GB?

This is my first armor build and i'd like to join if possible.

Josh

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Monday, June 23, 2008 7:39 AM
mg.mikael:  Nice progress there, I like this tank, very unique!

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Monday, June 23, 2008 8:07 AM

I should think that that 234 would qualify...can you post that pic you're looking at?

A wee 1/72 dio would be pretty nifty. Big Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Monday, June 23, 2008 8:20 AM
dupes:  FastasEF sent me a PM too about joining this GB, I requested he do the same...

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Bridgeview, Illinois
Posted by mg.mikael on Monday, June 23, 2008 5:13 PM
Hey dupes, today I painted some of the wax practice pieces with enamel paint. And guess what............. it worked. The enamel paint sticks just fine and dry's normally. A complete success!Big Smile [:D]  In my next update I'll show photos of the painted wax piece.

"A good plan executed now is better than a perfect plan next week." - George S. Patton

  Photobucket 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cheney, WA
Posted by FastasEF on Monday, June 23, 2008 11:56 PM

.

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:11 AM

Actually, they're both 234's. Smile [:)]

The top one is a 234/2 (commonly referred to as a "Puma"), and the bottom pic is a 234/1. I think you mentioned already having a kit? If not, Dragon makes the whole line (234/1-4) in 1/35 scale. Italeri also did several of them, at least the 2 and 3? I'm sure there's a pile in 1/72 as well. Wink [;)]

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cheney, WA
Posted by FastasEF on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:13 PM

.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:21 PM

Hey guys,

 Sorry I have not been participating for awhile, but I wanted to post a couple of in-progress shots of my Stug.  Generally I am pleased with the kit, though I think Dragon over-engineers some of its stuff a little much.  Originally I had toyed with the idea of doing some sort of interior detail, but have now chosen against that decision.  Still, I will have a couple of open hatches because I want a fig or two, so I went ahead and painted the interior black.  I actually may do the base coat in black as well, we shall see.

The pics aren't great, but they do give you a general idea for where I am at.  I am going to try the 'template' method for painting the road wheels, which will be a first for me.  I also think that I will try to do something with the articulating tracks - maybe have it climbing up on curb or driving over a small pile of rubble.  OK, enough idle chatter, here are a few photos...

Hope to have some more (and better) updates soon.

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:06 AM

Hey Boyd! Is that the "smart kit" release by DML, or one of their older kits?

EDIT - counted the roadwheels, it's a IV...Whistling [:-^]

Like how you've painted the tires...what is that stuck in all of the holes? Rolled up paper? Going to have to try that one. Thumbs Up [tup]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:29 AM
 dupes wrote:

Like how you've painted the tires...what is that stuck in all of the holes? Rolled up paper? Going to have to try that one. Thumbs Up [tup]

 

Dupes,

Yup, its the Stug IV... I think it is kit #6043.  Like I said, I am pretty happy with the kit, but I do think they over did it a bit.  Some of the assemblies seem overly complicated... but I guess that is part of what you get with Dragon.

The outer road wheels are on wooden skewers.  The inners (which have smaller diameter mounting holes) are on q-tips.  First time I used them for this purpose, but it sure does make working with them easy.

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Peterborough, Ontario
Posted by Townsy11 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 9:13 PM
Is this GB still just "tanks"? Because I didn't really think a 234 would qualify if soConfused [%-)]
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his."-- General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 8:39 AM
Townsy11: Yep, this GB is for tanks only.

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Peterborough, Ontario
Posted by Townsy11 on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 5:19 PM

Well, not to tread on any toes here or anything, but then why was my BMP dissallowed? it seems to me that it's as much of a tank as the 234 is. I was planning on making an urban dio for it too.

EDIT: In actuality, only 5 of the 14+ participants in this GB are entering actual tanks?

I mean, it's your GB so do with it what you please, I'm just saying...

"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his."-- General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cheney, WA
Posted by FastasEF on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 7:27 PM

( I deleted my posts as sometimes I am quite slow on the uptake and am not part of this GB with my 234. Sorry if this caused any problems).

I also Google Image searched all the entrants vehicles and they all seem to be tanks.

Josh

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Peterborough, Ontario
Posted by Townsy11 on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 8:02 PM
 FastasEF wrote:

I also Google Image searched all the entrants vehicles and they all seem to be tanks.

Not really, if you get technical...

ISU-122/152= SPG's

M10= TD

Sig33 Pz.III= Assault gun

SturmTiger= Assault gun

M18 Hellcat= TD

Stug IV= TD

SU-76M= SPG

Sd.Kfz.234= Heavy Recon Vehicle

(SPG= Self Propelled Gun, TD= Tank destroyer)

I'm not saying that you can't be a part of this GB Josh, SMJ already said that you can. I'm just whining that my BMP isn't allowedWhistling [:-^]

"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his."-- General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cheney, WA
Posted by FastasEF on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 8:28 PM

Eh, i'll follow the tank rule and just build the 234 as a seperate build.

I think I may have jumped the gun when I saw "Urban Armor" and instead of reading every last piece of the rules I just assumed all armor that saw urban warfare was allowed.

Oh well, maybe next time.

Josh

(Edit: Just out of curiosity. I looked up BMP and it looks like a tank to me(?). Honestly, the 234 is the furthest thing from a tank as can be as it has no tracks. Now, just to learn something new as i'm clueless when it comes to armor. What classifies a tank, a tank?).

Thanks,
Josh

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Peterborough, Ontario
Posted by Townsy11 on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 8:49 PM
 FastasEF wrote:

Just out of curiosity. I looked up BMP and it looks like a tank to me(?). Honestly, the 234 is the furthest thing from a tank as can be as it has no tracks. Now, just to learn something new as i'm clueless when it comes to armor. What classifies a tank, a tank?).

Thanks,
Josh

Hey Josh, the BMP is designated as an IFV (or Infantry Fighting Vehicle) it still has anti-armour capabilities and in most aspects is a tank, but it differs because it's purpose is to carry a squad of infantry into battle and is technically designated as an IFV, not a main battle tank.

According to Wikipedia, a tank is defined as this:

"A tank is a tracked, armoured fighting vehicle designed for front-line combat and combines strong strategic and tactical offensive and defensive capabilities. Firepower is normally provided by a large-calibre main gun in a rotating turret and secondary machine guns, while heavy armour and all-terrain mobility provide protection for the tank and its crew, allowing it to perform all primary tasks of the armoured troops on the battlefield."

and here's Wiki's definition of a tank destroyer/ self-propelled gun to show the difference:

"A self-propelled anti-tank gun, or tank destroyer, is a type of armoured fighting vehicle. Tank destroyers are used primarily to provide anti-tank support in combat operations but do not fit all the criteria of a tank. They may mount a high-velocity anti-tank gun but have an open turret, no turret at all or run on wheels instead of tracks. Vehicles which carry an anti-tank guided missile launcher are referred to as ATGM carriers.

Tank destroyers are smaller, faster and cheaper than main battle tanks. While they have the necessary weapons to destroy MBT's, tank destroyers are too lightly armored to withstand direct hits from MBT cannons, and can be destroyed by other weapons (like explosives) that would not destroy an MBT. Tank destroyer crews are always trained to primarily hunt down enemy tanks."

Hope that helps, and sorry for any inconvenience.

"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his."-- General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Thursday, July 3, 2008 9:28 AM
Guys:  Just wanted to chime in here...and hey townsy11 thanks for those definitions.  I'm not an armored fighting vehicle expert by ANY stretch of the imigination, I just wanted this GB to be for tanks.  When I made that guideline I asked for photos/proof to help imagine the setting/history...if it looks and sounds like a "tank" to me, I'm for it!  This is not a technically accurate GB, just for some kick-*** tank modeling!!!

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Peterborough, Ontario
Posted by Townsy11 on Thursday, July 3, 2008 4:49 PM

 SMJmodeler wrote:
Guys:  Just wanted to chime in here...and hey townsy11 thanks for those definitions.  I'm not an armored fighting vehicle expert by ANY stretch of the imigination, I just wanted this GB to be for tanks.  When I made that guideline I asked for photos/proof to help imagine the setting/history...if it looks and sounds like a "tank" to me, I'm for it!  This is not a technically accurate GB, just for some kick-*** tank modeling!!!

Sorry if I was being a bit of a rivet-counter back there SMJ, I understand now what you meant for guidelines.

AnywayWhistling [:-^].. so does this look like a tank to you?

Image:BMP-1 03.jpg

Big Smile [:D]

"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his."-- General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Reno, NV
Posted by espins1 on Saturday, July 5, 2008 12:01 PM
 Townsy11 wrote:

 SMJmodeler wrote:
Guys:  Just wanted to chime in here...and hey townsy11 thanks for those definitions.  I'm not an armored fighting vehicle expert by ANY stretch of the imigination, I just wanted this GB to be for tanks.  When I made that guideline I asked for photos/proof to help imagine the setting/history...if it looks and sounds like a "tank" to me, I'm for it!  This is not a technically accurate GB, just for some kick-*** tank modeling!!!

Sorry if I was being a bit of a rivet-counter back there SMJ, I understand now what you meant for guidelines.

AnywayWhistling [:-^].. so does this look like a tank to you?

Image:BMP-1 03.jpg

Big Smile [:D]

It has a roughly similar look to a tank, but that all changes when the rear door swings open and infantary come piling out of it.  It probably wouldn't engage any enemy tanks either, especially while the troops were inside.  Whistling [:-^]

The BMP was designed based on the Soviets vision of the modern battlefield in Europe in which infantry would need to be protected from nuclear, chemical and biological threats.  

It is not designed to take on enemy armor in armored formations......

Scott Espin - IPMS Reno High Rollers  Geeked My Reviews 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Monday, July 7, 2008 8:59 AM
 Townsy11 wrote:

AnywayWhistling [:-^].. so does this look like a tank to you?

Image:BMP-1 03.jpg

Big Smile [:D]

Tracks...check,  road wheels...check, barrel...check,  turret...check.  YES, looks like a tank to me.

Now you need some photo proof of that bad boy in an urban setting, or do a dio' and describe the "scene" you visualize this within an urban setting and then build it!

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Bridgeview, Illinois
Posted by mg.mikael on Tuesday, July 8, 2008 7:17 PM

Here's my latest update so far on my SU-76M.Cool [8D]

I started and completed putting the tracks together, using one of doog's tutorial's. The tracks were painted using Tamiya Acrylic Flat Earth. Still experimenting with washes and weathering for tracks on a past finished model. So it may be awhile before the tracks are completley done.

The lower portion of the hull was painted with ModelMaster Enamel. The roadwheels are not yet glued on, since their obviously not done yet. Only big problem so far was with the roadwheels, they woudn't fit on the suspension arms. Sigh [sigh] So ALOT of sanding was needed and the roadwheels still fit on too tightly.

All comments, suggestions, and questions welcome!Smile [:)]

"A good plan executed now is better than a perfect plan next week." - George S. Patton

  Photobucket 

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Kansas City MO
Posted by Dougums on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:16 PM

   Well I have bad news ... I must change my entry.  The tiger I was going to build is missing some road wheels. Banged Head [banghead] So I would like to change my entry to a 1/35 Tamiya Sherman OOB. ( I guess I will save the aftermarket goodies from my tiger for a later time )  I do although have a DML figure set that would go nicely with it. 

  

 

I'm kinda bummed out.  The tiger was the oldest kit in my stash. SWMBO should be thrilled to hear i need a new one. Well ... SoapBox [soapbox] happens!

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:44 AM
Dougums: I'll make the change...I forget, were you doing a dio'?  That's a great photo! 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Schroon Lake, NY
Posted by SMJmodeler on Friday, July 18, 2008 11:17 AM

Guys:  If you recall, I'll be doing a dio' for my Panther A with the Rome Colosseum as the backdrop.  I will be replicating the ground floor arches.  I will probably build one full arch and a portion of another.  Heres what I'll be attempting.

groundfloorsm.jpg (17916 byte)
Ground floor

I'm not sure if I will do the gate, I don't even think it was there during the War.  Here's the Panther in context as my inspriration:

I haven't started the kit yet, but I'm on a hunt for materials for the colosseum and hope to start soon.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Bridgeview, Illinois
Posted by mg.mikael on Friday, July 18, 2008 11:31 AM
SMJmodeler: WOW, that dio is gonna look awesome when done! I'm looking forward to your build.Smile [:)]

"A good plan executed now is better than a perfect plan next week." - George S. Patton

  Photobucket 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Bridgeview, Illinois
Posted by mg.mikael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:41 AM

I have to ask, where is all the GB members?? It's just so quiet here in this GB, that I feel lonely. Laugh [(-D] Just kiddin' I know theirs a ton of GB's going on now, so many people are finishing up those.

As for myself, I'm gonna try and post an update of my progress, today.

"A good plan executed now is better than a perfect plan next week." - George S. Patton

  Photobucket 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.