SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Castles of Steel, 1880 - 1914 *Group Build* (pg 17)...

68686 views
460 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, July 8, 2011 10:40 PM

The Navigator

As a wise man once said:

"Get building and post pics!"

I agree and I'm in. Manstein your comment about the size is a good observation. I'm looking at my Borodino, which is a battleship, and he's (that's right) 14 inches. Oh, stop it.

My Emden is about 10 inches.

 

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: Here
Posted by The Navigator on Friday, July 8, 2011 10:47 PM

bondoman

 

 The Navigator:

 

As a wise man once said:

"Get building and post pics!"

 

I agree and I'm in. Manstein your comment about the size is a good observation. I'm looking at my Borodino, which is a battleship, and he's (that's right) 14 inches. Oh, stop it.

 

My Emden is about 10 inches.

 

Too easy! Good night everybody!

I have many books and my Lair smells of rich mahogany!!! Stay thirsty my fellow MOJOs!




  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 9, 2011 8:56 AM

Cool---the rat-lines come in PE so no fuss, no muss there...

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Denver, Colorado
Posted by waynec on Saturday, July 9, 2011 10:03 AM

i agree. the GMM for EMDEN has pe rat lines too. makes me wonder if TING YUEN and CHEN YUEN had ratlines. there are steps on the aft part of the masts. i have seen photos with, without, and i'm not sure.

it is exciting that a couple of obscure ships from an obscure war is going on 6 pages in the forum. i can't wait to get started on these.

Никто не Забыт    (No one is Forgotten)
Ничто не Забыто  (Nothing is Forgotten)

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 9, 2011 11:06 AM

waynec

it is exciting that a couple of obscure ships from an obscure war is going on 6 pages in the forum. i can't wait to get started on these.

I agree...

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 9, 2011 7:45 PM

Wow---these MOJO's had torpedoes---and some weird guns that almost look like a multi-barrelled small calibre cannon---sort of like a large "pepper-box" type gun...maybe Gatling guns?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Saturday, July 9, 2011 11:27 PM

Be about the right age for some of the QF, Quick-Firing Gatlings in naval mounts. 

If memory serves, Vickers built 1"/1 pounder sized gatling guns for anti-smallcraft use.

Having helped manhandle the carriage-mounted .45-70 Gatling for some living-history people, I can only imagine what a 20-25mm bore Gatling would be like to operate.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 10, 2011 9:42 AM

CapnMac82

Be about the right age for some of the QF, Quick-Firing Gatlings in naval mounts. 

If memory serves, Vickers built 1"/1 pounder sized gatling guns for anti-smallcraft use.

Having helped manhandle the carriage-mounted .45-70 Gatling for some living-history people, I can only imagine what a 20-25mm bore Gatling would be like to operate.

Here's a diagram of what they look like in the very nice instruction sheet:

Here's what the main guns look like in the instruction sheet---very nice!

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:33 AM

That's a nice looking model.

I particularily like those barbettes for the big guns.

Yes those look like some early machine gun, multi barreled. I looked through a bunch of pictures of MG's this morning and Gatlings do come closest. If so, that magazine on top usually was a toroid, not a disk. That would look very nice as a detail. Russian ships of the era typically had Maxims, naturally, that were dismounted and could be fitted to the larger launches or small torpedo boats the ship might carry.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Denver, Colorado
Posted by waynec on Sunday, July 10, 2011 12:48 PM

CHEN YUEN and, i assume TING YUEN, have 6 barrel 3.7cm guns.

ting yuen 3.7cm cannon

 

 

 

Никто не Забыт    (No one is Forgotten)
Ничто не Забыто  (Nothing is Forgotten)

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, July 10, 2011 1:07 PM
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 10, 2011 1:08 PM

The recoil mechanism is wearing blue...

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 10, 2011 1:36 PM
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 10, 2011 2:05 PM
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 11, 2011 10:45 AM

waynec

ka-models (?) out of korea makes laser cut wood decks but you have to cut al the deck furniture from the plastic deck. not sure if that is time effective.

I have some experience with KA wooden decks and from what I have seen they have always pre-cut the holes to fit around the deck furniture...I just looked at the set for this ship on Free Time Hobbies' website and it looks to have pre-cut spaces to fit over the furniture as well...

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:22 PM

Coming Soon:

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, July 12, 2011 5:03 PM

http://www.beiyang.org/bybq/gelin.htm

EDIT: home from work and meant to add- this site is a good one for your favorite subject, and holds up pretty well under Google translate.

There's your Gatling gun, which appears to have been fitted with a water jacket. That is pretty good stuff- I have not ever come across another reference to a ship armed with Gatling guns. It looks like it has a receiver on the top that does just that for the big drum magazine. I looked at your scanned funny papers a little more closely, and it may be that the magazines have a hole thru the middle. if not, needs to be.

Your friend Doenitz of course commanded a fine light cruiser, the Breslau, during the Great War and, beyond wearing a Fez to those parties at the Topkapi, held up the ideals of the art of war at sea pretty fairly.

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 8:01 AM

So you have concluded that these MOJO's are Gatling guns and not multi-barreled cannon???

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 8:50 AM

The ones up in the tops are Gatling guns I'm pretty certain. The multi barrel Hotchkiss cannons weigh about 1000 lbs, and their ammunition up there would be problematic.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:26 AM

Manstein's revenge

Coming Soon:

http://images.kitlink.com/Products/images/Bronco/BOM5016.JPG

A build-up of this MOJO:

http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery/bb/plan/tingyuen-350-mc/ting-01.jpg

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:19 PM

Manstein's revenge

So you have concluded that these MOJO's are Gatling guns and not multi-barreled cannon???

Just remember that "Gatling" covers a wide range of bore diameters, from .45-70 to 57mm.

Vickers and Hotchkiss  made "QF" quick fire guns firing ammunition no more weighty than the 20x110mm used in WWII.  The QF rounds were low-impulse black-powder ammunition, too.  The Hotchkiss 37 was a 37x65mm, if memory serves, low velocity arcing trajectory ("arcs like a rainbow"). 

Would not have been a major deal in a fighting top.  Consider that the Royal Navy had installed 2 & 3 pounder swivel guns in the fighting tops of its wooden fighting ships for quite some time.  Having a "stick" magazine with 8-10 1-1/2" explosive shells that could be fired rapidly from a fighting top is 'worth' the stability issues of getting the support steel and iron up there--and if you are designing masts to take the strain of propulsive sails, you are starting from far stouter mast sections than for  holding up antennae and the like.  So, a "donut" magazine makes a lot of sense, too.  Be willing to wager it was alternating-feed and unsprung, too.

I'd not be surprised if the gatling previous pictured in this thread were a 57mm, a "six pounder" sized revolving cannon.  Which size would be appropriate for that superstructure deck mounting, too.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 8:20 PM

Well, it is proven to be an "interesting subject". I know little to nothing about automatic weapons, or light arms of any kind, in the pre-dread era. In the course of researching the Borodino and it's brothers, there's some information on the 47mm Hotchkiss guns, plus the Maxim guns in the tops that were movable. But after that I check out, however interested to learn more.

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: Here
Posted by The Navigator on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:45 PM

I sense a group build coming soon!

I have many books and my Lair smells of rich mahogany!!! Stay thirsty my fellow MOJOs!




  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:09 PM

Yeah, Vance is already saving his paper napkins and chapstik tubes...

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:40 PM

Certainly, always game. However the selection is pretty limited in plastic. I am curious to know, and haven't been able to find much, on what other ships Armstrong was building for other navies at that time.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Hancock, Me USA
Posted by p38jl on Thursday, July 14, 2011 8:03 AM

Manstein's revenge

Yeah, Vance is already saving his paper napkins and chapstik tubes...

  Yes

[Photobucket]

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Denver, Colorado
Posted by waynec on Thursday, July 14, 2011 9:22 AM

esmeralda for the chilean navy immediately comes to mind.

Никто не Забыт    (No one is Forgotten)
Ничто не Забыто  (Nothing is Forgotten)

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:09 PM

bondoman

Certainly, always game. However the selection is pretty limited in plastic. I am curious to know, and haven't been able to find much, on what other ships Armstrong was building for other navies at that time.

Okay, what should I put you down for?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:11 PM

What's the theme? Elswick cruisers?

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:25 PM

bondoman

What's the theme? Elswick cruisers?

Yes, or pre-dreadnought crusiers???

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.