The Official F-4 Phantom II Group Build 2011

Rich:

It may be lense, but the nose looks a bit cambered to the aircraft's starboard, not a crit, probably just the camera or lighting/shading:

Hey, love that F-86 in the background, hey, I've never seen a jar-fulla-j'dams before!...lol...

Well.  It's starting to look like a Phantom. :)  I assembled the main fuselge and wing sub assemblies today.  There is one thing Hasegawa could do to vastly improve the aft end of this bird.  They need to put one or two guide pins and holes where the wings and top fuselage meet, outboard just behing the wings on the fuselage where the engines are put in.  That section never properly lines up without either using CA or holding the pieces together correctly until the regular polystyrene cement dries.  I ended up using CA.  I got a tiny bit of snding to do in those locations now, but just a couple of minutes worth to smooth them down again.  Here are some images.

You can sort of see what I mean in a few of these.

Not too bad.  Better than my FGR.2 anyways.  Next up, tail stabilators, then we do a few detail bits and then primary paint.  Comments always welcome.  I will post more as she progresses.

(P.S.) Note the tire bulges on the top of the wing.  I had to sand those down quite a bit.  They looked like big lego blocks...  Oh yeh.  Does anyone have any spare snapped off metal or plastic Pitot tubes the right size for this bird?  I stink at sprue stretching and I can't find anything here that will work.

Rich

Rich;

Try to get in sone R&R this weekend, maybe take up a hobby?....LOL.....great work man......

Thanks!

oortiz10

Rich,

I know I'm not Berny, but I hope you'll still accept my answer...

The colors are:

Tan: 30219

Green: 34079

Green: 34102

Grey: 36622

Here's a drawing and paint chart:  http://www.cybermodeler.com/aircraft/f-4/f-4_profile02.shtml

Hope this helps!

Cheers!

-O

 

Jim;

That looks Phab!

Oortiz:

Magniphicent!

You got patience, or good eyes, or both!

Rich,

I know I'm not Berny, but I hope you'll still accept my answer...

The colors are:

Tan: 30219

Green: 34079

Green: 34102

Grey: 36622

Here's a drawing and paint chart:  http://www.cybermodeler.com/aircraft/f-4/f-4_profile02.shtml

Hope this helps!

Cheers!

-O

Berny.  Could you give me those FS numbers for the SEA Camo again?  I can't find the post that had them, and I need to pick up some more.

Thanks

Rich

That's great Dom!  Make sure to tell her we need her to break the light speed barrier and solve the mystery of anti-gravity propulsion.  Failing that, tell her to ust design some really cool planes. :)

Rich

Bockscar

A quick update:

My niece was just accepted into an aeronautical engineering program, I think all of  those model kits and a visit to Dayton helped! I might have to send her a kit to celebrate!, last one she'll build for a few years....

A quick update:

My niece was just accepted into an aeronautical engineering program, I think all of  those model kits and a visit to Dayton helped! I might have to send her a kit to celebrate!, last one she'll build for a few years....

Hi Jim,

Lookin' good!  Especially for 1/72 scale!  Mine is in 1/48 and it is still a challenge.

Ken

Hi O,

I think you are doing a phabulous job! (Pun intended!)  Looks very nice! 

Ken

Looking great, jimbot! I've done tape belts here and there and they add just enough visual information for the eye to accept the situation, but splotches of paint as buckles don't really do the deed, and PE is still largely baffling to me...

For myself, I'm production-lining 24 missiles, a dozen each of Sparrows and rattlers, as a mini-project to get me away from cockpits and seats for a bit. I've discovered I hate cockpits probably more than anything else at this point, and I am real tired of MB 7s... (While pulling out a couple of TDs for the big -J anyway!) I'm cleaning up mold lines and sprue gates, and drilling out all exhausts. I'm half way through this phase, then it's over to the AB to get them into white (I'll do the big -J's intake interiors in the same session), then do the seekers, accent recessed lines, add decal stripes and finally clearcoat them.

In the same timeframe I would hope to get some seats into the Fujimi -J and get the canopy on and masked. That leaves me nine AB load-ups to finish the bird... Six load-ups to do the Fujimi -K (once that cockpit is ready to be buried under a closed hood).

Cheers, M/TB379

Hey gang! Lots of work happening here with you guys! I am even making a bit of progress! I am trying to make seat belts with masking tape and with mid-fifty-ish eyes and hands that don't seem as nimble as they once were, this 1/72nd scale gets to be a challenge!

So far:

This is as close as I can get with my little camera and get anything in focus. As to the color, a search online showed me anything from gray to many different greens to one example that was a tan color. I figured that belts must have to be replaced from time to time? Maybe that could explain the varied colors I saw? I like the idea of using some scrap PE for buckles though the scale is going to be a PIA!

Maybe it won't matter as you won't see much of it:

I just am not happy with that gap between the center canopy part and the fuselage. Not sure I can fill it without creating bigger problems at this late stage...

Anyway, the Geasel's finally getting some legs to stand on:

I notice an error in Hasegawa's scale construction here: there is no way those gear bays are deep enough to fit those wide tires and gear!

Oops! Pay no attention to the cockpit assembly going on in the left side of a couple of the photos! I told you I am not going to work on that F-105G!

Well, maybe just a little.....

OK Phantom fans,

I know I haven't been around in a while and since Ken called me out, I figured I should show that I am mashing plastic.  Slowly, yes, but I am getting some work done. 

Here are a couple of shots of some progress.  I’ve finished scribing the fuselage and I’ve started the riveting.  I’ve got the tail and the exhaust areas done, and I don’t think it looks half bad… 

I’ve started on the forward part of the fuse too…

Here’s a shot of an intake.  I’m pretty happy with the way their joints came out.  You can see the where I’ve filled some preliminary riveting with Mr. Surfacer.  I wasn’t totally happy with the way that area was turning out, so I’ve filled it and I’m gonna re-rivet later.

Anyway, that’s where I’m at.  I still have a looong way to go.  I haven’t even touched the wings or the pylons yet.  And there’s that pile of resin I’m supposed to hang on this bad boy…

So, drop your two cents into the bucket.  I’d love to hear your feedback!

Cheers!

-O

Hey Ken,

I don't have any right now, but I might be able to shoot a couple.  Stepping away, posting some pix, and getting some feedback might recharge my batteries.

-O

oortiz10

OK.  Next time I say something crazy, like, "I'm going to rescribe and rivet the whole thing..."

Slap me.

 

-O

 

 

Hi O,

It has been a while since we have heard from you.  Do you have any pictures?

Ken

OK.  Next time I say something crazy, like, "I'm going to rescribe and rivet the whole thing..."

Slap me.

-O

If I can't get PE lately, I have just been using Masking tape folded over, or tin foil.  The buckles are the tricky part.  I find it is possible, with enough patience. to scratch cut some from left over PE tree material.

Son Of Medicine Man

Hi Berny,

I have another question for you.  Looking at the picture of my ejection seats made me think of it.  How do you make the seat belts?  I still have the picture you posted a while back depicting how they should look, but I can't figure out what the best way to reproduce them would be.

Ken

Hi Berny,

I have another question for you.  Looking at the picture of my ejection seats made me think of it.  How do you make the seat belts?  I still have the picture you posted a while back depicting how they should look, but I can't figure out what the best way to reproduce them would be.

Ken

Hi Everyone!

I made a little progress on the cockpit tonight.  I kept getting interrupted so I did not get as much done as I had hoped.  Here is what it looks like tonight:

Ken

Thanks Berny!  I got the wing assembly done last night so I will probably attach the wings module to the fuselage tonight.  I had to hand cut a big chunk out of the inside fuselage bottom because of the length of the Aires Exhausts.  They came out great.  I did an aging effect using a base coat of MM Jet exhaust and a very strong black wash with MM acrylics in dark gray and black.  Inside the last stage turbine which is somewhat visible, is done in a similar manner but with steel washed titanium base coat and a light black wash over that.  It looks really good in my humble opinion.

I am still debating whether or not to do a full Diorama with crew and all, but I don't have the correct figures and honestly, my Diorama skills are not all that great.  Maybe I can talk Dom into doing that part if we can get together the resources.  That image of you and the crew that I saw a while back would be really useful. lol

Don't worry, I am not trying to embarass you, If I was trying to do that, I would do the figure painting myself LMAO.

Rich

berny13

Rich, your package was dropped off at the post office today.  I sent you the correct AN/ALQ-87(V)2 and AN/ALQ-101(V)1 ECM pods.  Paint the -87 pod gloss white.  Our unit had an ID number on the nose such as A042.  The numbers were the last two numbers of the pod serial number with a zero added just in front.  Our -87 pods had the A prefix. 

The -101 pod was all gloss white with gloss black radomes.  There was a forward radome and an aft radome.  The small gondola was also gloss black.  Some pods had an ID number which carried a B prefix and the last two numbers of the serial number with a zero added in front.  The ID will look like B028.  Some pods carried no ID numbers at all and the early pods did not have the markings usually found on later pods. 

berny13

Son Of Medicine Man:

berny13:

Here is how the two pods will look.  The top picture is of the AN/ALQ-87 ECM pods and the second is the AN/ALQ101 ECM pod.

 

 

Hi Berny,

I had already ordered the AN/ALQ-101 pod from Flightpath (David J. Parkins) when you posted this.  But there was no real way of knowing what version I was going to receive since there were no pictures on his website.  It finally arrived today and here is what it looks like:

 

After seeing your reply to Rich about the version I know that this is a newer version than what you used.  In fact from what information I could find, I am assuming that the AN/ALQ-101 you were using at the time in Vietnam was a prototype.

Anyway, you had offered to send me the correct one.  I know you sent one to Rich so I don't know if that offer is still good.  Anyway, if it is, I would appreciate it.

Ken

 

This is the type you need.  The AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod was just entering the Air Force inventory.  They were not a prototype but the first generation ALQ-101 pods put in production.  Later ALQ-101 pods were improved by adding more receivers, transmitters and processors which resulted in the pod growing in size and having more gondolas added.

A lot of talking heads and experts will tell you the AN/ALQ-119 ECM pod is an AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod with additional space in a larger gondola.  The truth is the AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod was air cooled with air ducts added on later versions.  The AN/ALQ-119 ECM pod was a complete redesigned pod which was much larger, lighter, and was cooled by freon gas.  There were four radaiators built on the side with two having the intake facing forward and the two back ones had the discharge facing aft.  The AN/ALQ-101 pod was a deception pod and the AN/ALQ-119 pod was a programmable noise and deception pod able to operate in both the training mode and combat mode with just a flip of a switch.

Give me a couple of days to get the pod packaged up and in the mail.    

 

Thank you Berny for the background.  I really enjoy learning about the F-4 and what you shared tonight just shows how much information I haven't yet learned.  I would really like the opportunity to spend a day with you with an F-4 so you could go over all the aspects of it.  I would have to video tape it so I could listen to again later because I know there would be no way I could absorb it all at once!

And thank you for offering that AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod to me, I really appreciate it!

Ken

Rich, your package was dropped off at the post office today.  I sent you the correct AN/ALQ-87(V)2 and AN/ALQ-101(V)1 ECM pods.  Paint the -87 pod gloss white.  Our unit had an ID number on the nose such as A042.  The numbers were the last two numbers of the pod serial number with a zero added just in front.  Our -87 pods had the A prefix. 

The -101 pod was all gloss white with gloss black radomes.  There was a forward radome and an aft radome.  The small gondola was also gloss black.  Some pods had an ID number which carried a B prefix and the last two numbers of the serial number with a zero added in front.  The ID will look like B028.  Some pods carried no ID numbers at all and the early pods did not have the markings usually found on later pods. 

Son Of Medicine Man

berny13:

Here is how the two pods will look.  The top picture is of the AN/ALQ-87 ECM pods and the second is the AN/ALQ101 ECM pod.

 

 

Hi Berny,

I had already ordered the AN/ALQ-101 pod from Flightpath (David J. Parkins) when you posted this.  But there was no real way of knowing what version I was going to receive since there were no pictures on his website.  It finally arrived today and here is what it looks like:

 

After seeing your reply to Rich about the version I know that this is a newer version than what you used.  In fact from what information I could find, I am assuming that the AN/ALQ-101 you were using at the time in Vietnam was a prototype.

Anyway, you had offered to send me the correct one.  I know you sent one to Rich so I don't know if that offer is still good.  Anyway, if it is, I would appreciate it.

Ken

This is the type you need.  The AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod was just entering the Air Force inventory.  They were not a prototype but the first generation ALQ-101 pods put in production.  Later ALQ-101 pods were improved by adding more receivers, transmitters and processors which resulted in the pod growing in size and having more gondolas added.

A lot of talking heads and experts will tell you the AN/ALQ-119 ECM pod is an AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod with additional space in a larger gondola.  The truth is the AN/ALQ-101 ECM pod was air cooled with air ducts added on later versions.  The AN/ALQ-119 ECM pod was a complete redesigned pod which was much larger, lighter, and was cooled by freon gas.  There were four radaiators built on the side with two having the intake facing forward and the two back ones had the discharge facing aft.  The AN/ALQ-101 pod was a deception pod and the AN/ALQ-119 pod was a programmable noise and deception pod able to operate in both the training mode and combat mode with just a flip of a switch.

Give me a couple of days to get the pod packaged up and in the mail.    

berny13

Here is how the two pods will look.  The top picture is of the AN/ALQ-87 ECM pods and the second is the AN/ALQ101 ECM pod.

 

Hi Berny,

I had already ordered the AN/ALQ-101 pod from Flightpath (David J. Parkins) when you posted this.  But there was no real way of knowing what version I was going to receive since there were no pictures on his website.  It finally arrived today and here is what it looks like:

After seeing your reply to Rich about the version I know that this is a newer version than what you used.  In fact from what information I could find, I am assuming that the AN/ALQ-101 you were using at the time in Vietnam was a prototype.

Anyway, you had offered to send me the correct one.  I know you sent one to Rich so I don't know if that offer is still good.  Anyway, if it is, I would appreciate it.

Ken

lol Bockscar,,,,,,in regards to "yesterday Rex forgot",,,,,,,have a little tale to tell ya (It's sort of about Phantoms, lol)

back on Memorial day, I was with the ole Gunny,  we were talking about friends we'd served with or ran into through the years,,,,got to talking about this one kid of one of the Sgts we both knew,,,,,his mom had nicknamed him Hawkman,,,,,,cute little kid we knew from age 2 to 6 or so,,,,,we're scratching our heads, and trying to think of this Sgts name,,,,no luck,,,,,,,my aunt walks by and gets all disgusted at us,,,,,,and blurts out "It was Sgt Hawk, you dumb grunts",,,,,yeah, his mom nicknamed him for his last name

oh well, back to trying to figure out why the prop on the lawn mower doesn't pull the thing down into the dirt

Rex

Bockscar

Ken:

The right pedal, man, better work on that, my computer scanner says it is about 0.0000000006th of an inch out, and even Oprah is already tweating about it, uhhhh....sorry man.....

Oh yeah, where'ld you get the 'disco' floor????....man lit up from underneath, ..........okay, Olivia Newton John, or was that Fara Newton Fawcet, uuuhhhh.....thank GAHshanks we do lose our memory with time.....lol.....

Dom, I swear you make me laugh more than anyone I know! 

Ken

Ken:

The right pedal, man, better work on that, my computer scanner says it is about 0.0000000006th of an inch out, and even Oprah is already tweating about it, uhhhh....sorry man.....

Oh yeah, where'ld you get the 'disco' floor????....man lit up from underneath, ..........okay, Olivia Newton John, or was that Fara Newton Fawcet, uuuhhhh.....thank GAHshanks we do lose our memory with time.....lol.....

sidure

Thanks a lot Rex, its what I was leaning toward and I was just wondering if anyone had a clear answer as to why some do and some dont. Like I said in my photo album that spans 6 years it all depends on the squadron. Its funny seeing a flight line with one squadron that has them and the other dosent. I have built some hasegawa kits that say they had red trim and in some of the tamiya kits I know their colour callouts are not always accurate. For the sake of it being a show bird and also because I am leaning toward doing the red edges, that is what I am going to do. At the end of the day its what I want it to look like anyway. Just didnt want to stray too far off accuracy

Steve