SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Battle of the Atlantic Feb. 1 to Aug 1, 2006

49181 views
878 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Saturday, December 3, 2005 3:51 AM
Jules I was looking at U-boat.net the other day and found this page on aircraft losses against U-boats

http://uboat.net/history/aircraft_losses.htm

The Sunderlands don't appear to figure as heavily in the number of losses , despite the fact you'd think their huge size and relatively low speed would make them an easy target.

Karl



Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 3, 2005 3:22 AM
 KJ200 wrote:

Dave I look forward to seeing your progress. I've always liked the Sunderland, but could never bring myself to build the Airfix kit!

Karl

EDIT: Forgot the bold!

 

Yeah i'm starting to understand the attraction to the Sunderland, the aircrews certainly loved the A/C....The book i'm reading which is a great read called Conflict over the Bay by Norman Franks ISBN no1-902304-09-8....It deals with coastal command actions during the timeframe of May- August 1943 which is the time that Donitz ordered his boats to stay up and fight and is full of first hand accounts of the actions of individual crews including engagments by JU 88's....Sunderlands and many other types were attacked by as many as 8 JU 88's at once and not only did many survive they also took a heavy toll on the 88's with reports of mulitple Ju 88's shot down by airgunners and returning home with bullet holes numbering in the hundreds......

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Friday, December 2, 2005 2:12 AM

 PanzerWulff wrote:
actually was it not the lancasters of 617 Squadron the ones which took out the TIRPITZ if so wouldn't they count for the battle of the atlantic slinging a grand slam or tallboy under their belly?

Not to forget the air sea rescue Lancs with a life boat under the belly, or any of the countless other aircraft involved in the air sea rescue role. Accurate Miniatures new Walrus would be an ideal candidate.

I think this one of the keys point from the Battle of the Atlantic, the sheer number of different ships and aircraft involved on both sides.

Karl

 

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Salisbury Massachucetts USA
Posted by PanzerWulff on Thursday, December 1, 2005 4:44 PM
actually was it not the lancasters of 617 Squadron the ones which took out the TIRPITZ if so wouldn't they count for the battle of the atlantic slinging a grand slam or tallboy under their belly?
ACE??? you were NEVER an ace AN ace HOLE maybe! (Lister to Rimmer on BBC's RED DWARF) Chris"Hey GRAVITY still works"Gray
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Thursday, December 1, 2005 10:42 AM
 KJ200 wrote:

Dave there are a whole load of Bomber Command aircraft that would be most suitable for this GB.

Be nice to see something a little off beat like a Hampden or a Whitley.

Karl

I agree, many of the older bombers were taken off the front lines and if they weren't used for training they were often used for ocean patrols. 

Dave

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posted by superbear on Thursday, December 1, 2005 8:04 AM

Thanks Dave.  It will be my pleasure to discoverall the pitfalls of that kit for you, better than dealing with the Airfix Halifax.

 

Would any of you knowledgeable folks know where I could get some info/pics of the mines droped by the RAF in support on naval operations. Thanks

 

Cheers

Bear

 

 

Marc
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Thursday, December 1, 2005 2:51 AM

Dave there are a whole load of Bomber Command aircraft that would be most suitable for this GB.

Be nice to see something a little off beat like a Hampden or a Whitley.

Karl

 

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:21 PM
It would be a pleasure Bear. For those of you wondering what a Lancaster has to do with the Battle for the Atlantic we had a discussion in the Canadian GB regarding the use of Bombers in the "Gardening" role. The bombers were often used to lay mines in the harbours and sea lanes of Axis controlled waters. As such I felt it met the criteria for this build. Besides that I have the same kit lined up in my stash for the middle of next year and I want to let Bear discover all the pitfalls first. Wink [;)]

Dave

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posted by superbear on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 8:38 PM

Dave Would you sign me up I'll be doing a 1/72 Lancaster.

 

Cheers

Bear

Marc
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:03 AM

Dave I look forward to seeing your progress. I've always liked the Sunderland, but could never bring myself to build the Airfix kit!

Karl

EDIT: Forgot the bold!

 

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Tuesday, November 29, 2005 11:55 AM
Karl:  NO I am not using the WEM set.  I've seen some build up reviews of it and it looks awesome but I just couldn't justify spending that much effort and money on something that will never be seen after its closed up.  I have scratched some interior stuff, nothing fancy just some floor boards, ip, etc so you don't see the whole interior when you look through the cockpit.  I also intend to scratch the early antenae array which is pretty straight forward.  The airfix kit doesn't have either of the radar options. Sad [:(]  I'll post some pics here since it is applicable to this GB when it starts to look like something.

Dave

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:17 AM

Marc I'm not sure that your definition of 'FUN' coincides with mine!

Dave are you using the WEM PE set for the Sunderland? I've seen this set used on a couple of kits, and it totally transforms the Sunderland's interior.

I'll get a sticky set up for the Spanish Civil War GB later next year.

Karl

 

 

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:59 AM
Great Marc, I'll update your build on the front page. As for the "fun" all I can say is good luck. I am currently working on a Airfix 1/72 Sunderland for the Canadian GB and I'm havng all the "fun" I can handle.

Karl, a Spanish Civil War build sounds great later next year.

Dave

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Piscataway, NJ!
Posted by wing_nut on Monday, November 28, 2005 8:09 PM

I just love it when the mail man has to get out of the truck and walk to the front door....means a packageBig Smile [:D]

 

So Dave, it is official I am down for an He 115 C-1, 1/72 Hobby kit.  The raised panels line are barely visble they are so fine so they will make an excellent guide for a rescribe.  And I am really looking forwrd to masking all that glassSad [:(].  Flash everywhere you look and a warped wing...mmmm fun.  I can't waitSmile [:)]

Marc  

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Monday, November 28, 2005 6:57 AM

Hitler had promised Raeder that there would be no war in Europe until at least 1946, allowing Raeder time to build up the Kriegsmarine to something like parity with the RN, if not in surface vessels, at least in subs.

The Norwegian campaign alone proved extremely costly for the Kriegsmarine, especially after Warspite's little cruise up the fjiords. Have a look at the site below for a table of German losses in Norway:

http://www.geocities.com/shipwrecks_magazine/narvik.htm

After that there is no way Raeder could have supported Sealion.

Karl

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 28, 2005 3:44 AM

Yeah Karl i think i recall reading somewhere that when war broke out Raeder sent a message to his navy telling them to die with honour, and if memory serves me correctly The Kreigsmarine were planning for a war to start in 1946 not 39.....Didn't Donitz say that he needed 300 operational U-Boats to defeat Britain.....

Oh yeah late 2006 should suit me OK for a Spanish Civil war GB, maybe the old Revell 1/125 type VII U-boat for that one, the only thing is i'd have to by the cutaway U-47 for the correct conning tower and the U-99 for the hull cause i wouldn't build the highly inaccurate U-47 with the interior, even then i'd have to cover up the cutaway section in the U-47 conning tower.....

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Monday, November 28, 2005 2:21 AM
 j.s.harrison wrote:

Karl And yeah i agree there was a real threat of Axis Invasion even in this country there was a scare of invasion from the Japanese but thankfully the Japanese failed to take Port Morseby.....Iv'e heard rumors which i'm not sure a true on not that the Japanese even had money printed for use in occupied Australia....

The Germans, particularly the SS were well advanced in their planning for the occupation of the UK, with primary and secondary arrest lists already drawn up. Len Deighton draws on much of this in 'SS GB', his fictional account of Britain under occupation, and a very good read.

I think Admiral Raeder was fully aware of the limitations of the Kreigsmarine, particularly after Norway, and more importantly the strength of the Royal Navy. So much so that the innitial troop estimates were a mere fraction of what would have bee required to mount a meaningful invasion, and without any heavy equipment until a port had been secured. Even with air superiority the Luftwaffe would have been powerless to stop the RN attacking their flanks at night, and bombarding the invasion beaches, much as the RN did during D Day.

Looks like I need to set up a Spanish Civil War GB, does anyone have any preferences for dates? I'm looking at late 2006 - early 2007.

Karl

 

 

 

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: SETX. USA
Posted by tho9900 on Sunday, November 27, 2005 9:12 PM

Darren - yeah I have been watching this baby and interested to see how accurate it is... I have a Gato class sub down the road from me.  The USS Cavalla (sank the Shokaku in the Battle of the Phillipine Sea) was later converted to an SSK (hunter / killer) I want to do her like the original Cavalla... now she looks closer to a Nautilus class sub. mainly the main sail.  But inside and on the main hull I have the best reference possible.. the original!!!

 

---Tom--- O' brave new world, That has such people in it!
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Melbourne, Australia
Posted by darson on Sunday, November 27, 2005 9:05 PM

Geez Dave get your act together will you, I can't believe you let such an obvious discrepancy in the GB Icon get through your QA Wink [;)]

Chris welcome to the build.  It looks like between you and Jules we should have all our U-boat questions covered off.

Btw all you submarine guys have you seen this little baby on Squadron?

http://www.squadron.com/ItemDetails.asp?item=rm0384

Karl a Spanish civil war build sounds great.  I know Classic Airframes are releasing a series of early model 109s which would be perfect for the period.

Cheers

---edit---

Jules I agree wholeheartedly on your reasoning as to why Operation Sea lion would have failed, add to that the weather in the channel and lack of clear landing zone and the Germans would have faced disaster

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 27, 2005 7:17 PM

Karl I think a Spanish Civil war GB would be cool, I've always wanted to do a 109D in Condor Legion Markings......

And yeah i agree there was a real threat of Axis Invasion even in this country there was a scare of invasion from the Japanese but thankfully the Japanese failed to take Port Morseby.....Iv'e heard rumors which i'm not sure a true on not that the Japanese even had money printed for use in occupied Australia....

My own personal opinion is and i have to say that this is my own feelings that any invasion of the UK, US or Australia by the Axis would have failed, i mean the Germans were planning on useing canal barges to invade England and they would have had to hit the beaches fighting and at this stage of the war no army had any real experience of what it took to invade a country by a seaborne assault....and even if the Germans managed to destroy the Royal Air Force Fighter command they still would have had to contend with for the most part the intact bomber command and i don't think that the Royal Navy would have sat still in Scapa flow while german Troops and supply ships were going back and forth from Dover to Calais.......

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 27, 2005 6:55 PM

 Imperator-Rex wrote:
j.s.harrison, in fact Germany sent more U-Boats than those two to patrol off the Spanish coasts as part of the “Non-Interventionist Committee”. No less than fifteen U-boats were used – U.14, U.19, U.23 and U.25 to 36.

U.33 and U.34 were to play a different role: they were engaged in a clandestine patrolling mission in Spanish waters in November and December 1936: this was called Operation Ursula... Here's a nice article that tells the stoy better than I could do:

http://uboat.net/articles/?article=59

Regards,
Chris


U.35 & U.32 in February 1938, preparing for another patrol to Spain (note the large, white numerals on the coning tower, removed upon outbreak of the war)

Chris Thanks for the info, i had a feeling that there may have been more boats sent to Spanish waters but couldn't find any info in my books except the half a page which mentioned U-33 and 34...I'll check out U-boat.net and have a look.......Thumbs Up [tup]

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Sunday, November 27, 2005 1:36 PM
 tho9900 wrote:

Jules - I think the overkill was based on large scale paranoia and fear at the beginning of the war.  From what my older relatives described there was a Hun or Jap behind every tree waiting to jump out in some peoples minds...



In the UK the Homeguard were notoriously trigger happy, particularly during the invasion scare of late 1940. There are quite a few cases of people being shot by the Homeguard on suspicion of being German agents, hardly surpising following all the talk of a 5th column in France in the summer of 1940.

In one instance, a Homeguard unit thought that the invasion was in full swing, so set up wires across a major coast road. Unfortunately a regular Army despatch rider came up the road shortly afterwards with a sadly predictable outcome. I think it's easy to forget just how real was the threat of Axis invasion both in the US and the UK.

BTW I'm starting to think a Spanish Civil War GB might be required. What does everyone else think?

Don't worry, won't be for a while though.

Karl

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Switzerland
Posted by Imperator-Rex on Sunday, November 27, 2005 8:46 AM
j.s.harrison, in fact Germany sent more U-Boats than those two to patrol off the Spanish coasts as part of the “Non-Interventionist Committee”. No less than fifteen U-boats were used – U.14, U.19, U.23 and U.25 to 36.

U.33 and U.34 were to play a different role: they were engaged in a clandestine patrolling mission in Spanish waters in November and December 1936: this was called Operation Ursula... Here's a nice article that tells the stoy better than I could do:

http://uboat.net/articles/?article=59

Regards,
Chris


U.35 & U.32 in February 1938, preparing for another patrol to Spain (note the large, white numerals on the coning tower, removed upon outbreak of the war)
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: SETX. USA
Posted by tho9900 on Sunday, November 27, 2005 8:09 AM

Jules - I think the overkill was based on large scale paranoia and fear at the beginning of the war.  From what my older relatives described there was a Hun or Jap behind every tree waiting to jump out in some peoples minds... I think adding the coastal guns was wise seeing it all in restrospect.  The fact that the Uboats were able to get so close to (at that time) at least 95% of the nation's oil supply and refineries is a bit scary.  All it would take as you said, is another scapa flow incident.  At night the anti-sub aircraft would be hindered, and as far as I know the only naval ships were about a half hour away even at flank speed.  30 minutes would allow a lot of damage from the 88 or 105 deck guns on the Uboats....  even if it were sunk the psychological damage as well as loss of irreplacable resources would have had a major, if only temporary impact on the US.

Both the decision to pull the Uboats out of the Gulf coupled with better anti-sub measures later made the guns obsolete.

---Tom--- O' brave new world, That has such people in it!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Sunday, November 27, 2005 7:55 AM
 j.s.harrison wrote:

Something else that i wonder about is why the Germans never embraced the Escort carrier as a means to sink merchant shipping, imagine how much damage they could have done if they  carried 12 or so Stukas and maybe 6 of those navalised 109's to protect the carrier from any allied aircraft......



I don't think the Germans ever really grasped naval air power, despite the lessons that the Allies' application of the same should have provided them with. The fact that the German's only aircraft carrier, the Graf Zeppelin, only had AA defences on one side, says much for the Germans lack of understanding.

Had the Germans managed to build escort carriers they would have required a large number of destroyers to escort them, something they really didn't have after Norway.

Karl

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 27, 2005 4:36 AM

Not much Dave the U-boats didn't really do much during the Spanish civil war, In fact only 2 boats the U-33 commanded by Freiweild and the U-34 Grosse were sent and on the 27/28th of November 1936 they entered the Med and despite several attemps had no luck in sinking any Republican ships...Both boats were ordered home on the 10th of Dec and while on it's way home on the 12th U-34 sighted the republican submarine C-3, Grosse dived his boat and fired a single torpedo at C-3 which tore it in two and sent it to the bottom of the Med, of a crew of 40 only 3 sailers survived from the C-3....That was the only Republican naval vessel sank by the U-Boats during the Spanish civil war that i know of......

Tom It actually sounds like overkill adding coastal guns around that area but it shows great foresight on the part of the planners when you consider how the U-47 managed to sneak past all the blockships and what nots to get into Scapa Flow undetected.....

Something else that i wonder about is why the Germans never embraced the Escort carrier as a means to sink merchant shipping, imagine how much damage they could have done if they  carried 12 or so Stukas and maybe 6 of those navalised 109's to protect the carrier from any allied aircraft......

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Vernon, BC, Canada
Posted by razordws on Sunday, November 27, 2005 12:54 AM
Marc, I'll update your build on Monday as I have to do it from my work computer.

Rex, I was not aware of this detail that you have pointed out. You have much better eyes than I have to have picked that out of that tiny photo. If I get a chance I will fix it up. Thanks for pointing it out. Anymore info on the U-boats involvement in the Spanish civil war?

Dave

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Switzerland
Posted by Imperator-Rex on Saturday, November 26, 2005 9:31 AM
razordws, the signature picture of the GB is nice, but why does it have vertical stripes of black, white and red on the conning tower? These markings were only carried during the Spanish Civil War by U-Boats operating in Spanish waters as part of the German “Non-Interventionist Committee”. This involvement lasted from November 1936 until May 1939, but is not, historically speaking, a part of the Battle of the Atlantic...
I just wanted to make sure you were aware of that anachronism.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Piscataway, NJ!
Posted by wing_nut on Saturday, November 26, 2005 7:10 AM
Dave-Unless it is I get something less than what was advertised put me down for an He 115-C1.

Marc  

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: SETX. USA
Posted by tho9900 on Friday, November 25, 2005 4:39 PM

the wild thing was when I was a kid going to Galveston Island (sort of at the mouth to the inlet to the Port of Houston where 90% of the oil here is produced) there were these huge metal rings looking like circular railroad tracks in the ground near the docks.  I asked my dad what they were and he told me they were for anti-shipping/anti submarine coastal guns... they must have been huge as the steel tracks are about 30 feet in diameter... that little fact didn't sink in till years later when reading the history of the Uboat packs off the gulf picking off shipping.  there are more than a few merchant wrecks off the mouths of the Sabine River and Galveston Bay from those attacks... and as was mentioned they would wait till night time and pick them off, highlighted against the glow of lights from the towns.  Eventually they got smart and began blacking them out, but not consistently...

Another story I thought interesting was where the Sabine River empties into Sabine Lake there is a Confederate Civil War fort.  In the early 1940's part of it was converted into an ammo storage dump for another set of coastal guns about 25 meters from the fort.  The war planners decided that it might be likely the Uboats would try to navigate up the Sabine River to shell the inland refineries and were trying to prepare in advance.  The magazines are still there, oddly enough without a marker explaining what they are.

---Tom--- O' brave new world, That has such people in it!
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.