Hello All,
Last weekend I was over the moon when I got to visit the Flying Heritage Collection in Seatlle. Paul Allen owns both a flying, BMW 801 powered 190 A–5, and a “flyable but not worth the risk in flying it” Fw 190 D–13. I made a post with links and such here.
Have you ever seen the movie, The Jerk? If so, you probably remember that part where Steve Martin is saying something along the lines of “All I need is the lamp. That’s it. And the pen. That’s all I need, the lamp and the pen. And….” That’s me with detail photos. Anyway, there are several that might be useful to this GB; here are a couple.
First of all, as we’re all thinking, these are restored aircraft. However, if there’s anyone who has the means and patience to get all of the details right, I’m sure it’s Mr. Allen and his budget. So personally, I’ll give these examples a lot of weight. However, you can form your own opinion.
First is the padding around the D–13 instrument cover (this has been a subject of debate and confustion, at least for me):
Conversely, here is the same part of the A–5 model:
Something else that’s always bugged me is that roundish aperture on the port side of the fuselage under the canopy. In the Eduard kits, it’s just flat. After some reasearch, this is the filling port for the fuel primer line, and as you can see it’s a recessed port with a cap on it. So some extra work is in order, at least on my model!
I also find it funny how people say that the gun covers probably didn’t fit that well, however this one looks pretty darn good (yes, this is a non battle tested and maintained aircraft, but it shows how things probably started out):
Here’s one of the cowl flaps and rear part of the annular radiator; I’m thinking that despite the challenge of executing them, the Eduard etched cowl flaps are the only realistic way to go:
Anyway, check out the set and feel free to download any that you like.
I almost forgot! Here’s a link to my last visit to the USAF Museum in Dayton; I took a bunch of detail oriented phtos of the 190 D–9 (and Me 262) there. Here’s the link to the set:
National Museum of the USAF
Here’s one example of the detail type of shots you’ll find there:
Also, I have a good number of the Fw 190 F–8 in the Udvar-Hazy Center. That set is here:
Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center
More details, although they are really strict about using tripods; the idiots even hassled me over using a 3" tripod on the floor. Real nice. Anyway, I persevered, and got a bunch of good ones, among them these:
Lastly, the reason I’m not joining the GB is that there’s no way I could ever finish a project worth embarking on in a year. The D–9 that is the subject of my personal work in progress post has two years into it, and there is still so long to go. I doubt that even if the rules let me in (although I’m too far along as the rules say) that I’d be able to finish it. I’m hoping to though. Either way, I don’t want to be a deadbeat participant. The reason is that I travel a lot, and try to keep the family together when I’m home. So those two requirements put a big dent in my hobby time…
However, if it’s OK with y’all I’d like to look in from time to time, and offer whatever experiences I’ve had with my Eduard kits. I owe more details about the gun cowling / canopy / fuselage join. That will come in the next days.
Best regards,
Mike